On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:46:43 Michael Tokarev wrote:
Nope. This is getaddrinfo() function. So it is glibc, not gcc or
optimization.
getaddrinfo() does not work in jessie glibc when linked statically.
It immediately returns Name or service not known (rc=-2) without
trying to read
21.09.2014 17:19, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:46:43 Michael Tokarev wrote:
Nope. This is getaddrinfo() function. So it is glibc, not gcc or
optimization.
getaddrinfo() does not work in jessie glibc when linked statically.
It immediately returns Name or service not
On Sunday 21 September 2014 17:34:24 Michael Tokarev wrote:
This _is_ a glibc problem, and it can be trivially demonstrated by writing
a tiny program that calls, say, getaddrinfo() on its argument. When built
statically it always returns NOTFOUND, without any attempt to load any
nss modules
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:31:12 +0200 Diederik de Haas
didi.deb...@cknow.org wrote:
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:16:06 Michael Tokarev wrote:
Also, it is specific to amd64 arch, it does not
happen on i386 (from 2 variants of x86 arches).
It's not just limited to amd64, since I encountered the
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-8
Severity: important
When trying to ping an address, like debian.org, with busybox-static you
get a ping: bad address 'debian.org' error.
I knew that version 1.22.0-6 of busybox-static was working, so I also
downloaded version 1.22.0-7 and 1.22.0-8 and
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
12.08.2014 19:30, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-8
Severity: important
When trying to ping an address, like debian.org, with busybox-static you
get a ping: bad address 'debian.org' error.
Yes, this is what we have. Current
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #757941 [busybox-static] busybox-static: DNS resolver stopped working in
busybox-static version 1.22.0-7
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
757941: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757941
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
12.08.2014 21:16, Michael Tokarev wrote:
jessie does not work. Also, it is specific to amd64 arch, it does not
happen on i386 (from 2 variants of x86 arches).
No, i386 jessie does not work too. It was a very old jessie32 chroot here
where I tried to build it and it worked. So it looks like
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:16:06 Michael Tokarev wrote:
Also, it is specific to amd64 arch, it does not
happen on i386 (from 2 variants of x86 arches).
It's not just limited to amd64, since I encountered the issue on raspbian for
the Raspberry Pi, which is somewhere between armel and armhf.
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-08-12):
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
12.08.2014 19:30, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-8
Severity: important
When trying to ping an address, like debian.org, with busybox-static you
get a ping: bad address
12.08.2014 21:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Smells like a possible compiler optimization bug? (The relevant code
might be buggy and falling into undefined behaviour; meaning not a
compiler bug.) Should be easy to check by building at -O0.
Nope. This is getaddrinfo() function. So it is glibc,
11 matches
Mail list logo
