Control: retitle -1 unblock: busybox/1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-02-21):
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I just did so and uploaded
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:29:03PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
This probably counts as a d-i ack, but an explicit ack would be nice.
I probably really wanted to get stuff pushed to git first, but now that
it's done… here's an explicit d-i ack for you.
Added unblock-udeb.
Cheers,
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
I unblocked it, but it needs a d-i ack.
Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git.
This probably counts as a
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org (2015-02-18):
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I just did so
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org (2015-02-18):
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
Please push both your jessie branch and tag to
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org (2015-02-18):
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:30:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
wrote:
Please push both your jessie branch and tag to git.
I don't have write access to d-i repos.
Wrong.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 08:52:05AM +0100, Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I just did so and uploaded 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 to t-p-u.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:08:49PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
#768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the
debian/rules changes.
It is jessie-ignore just to be non-RC. The fun with static linking
and bugs it discovered shows
11.12.2014 10:52, Ivo De Decker wrote:
[]
As the libc issue with the static binary seems to be fixed in the libc version
in both jessie and sid, the only remaining issue is the missing build-using,
which can wait till after jessie.
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I'll
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-12-11):
11.12.2014 10:52, Ivo De Decker wrote:
[]
As the libc issue with the static binary seems to be fixed in the libc
version
in both jessie and sid, the only remaining issue is the missing build-using,
which can wait till after jessie.
11.12.2014 13:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Hello
can you please still push your master branch and tags to the git
repository? Last commit there points to debian/1.22.0-9 which is
5 revisions old, at least if I'm reading cgit and gitk properly.
Oh yeah. I'm sorry about that. Pushed now.
On Thursday 11 December 2014 08:52:05 Ivo De Decker wrote:
#768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the
debian/rules changes.
It is jessie-ignore just to be non-RC. The fun with static linking
and bugs it discovered shows that proper Built-Using field is really
(Putting on my d-i RM fedora.)
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-11-27):
Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix
(CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch,
fixing an integer overflow in lzo decompressor; it adds a Built-Using
control
27.11.2014 19:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Putting on my d-i RM fedora.)
Thank you for your review.
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-11-27):
Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix
(CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch,
fixing an
14 matches
Mail list logo
