On Wed, 2019-10-02 at 17:59 +0800, Ian Campbell wrote:
> If it's going to override/shadow (as opposed to simply working
> alongside/in parallel) urandom, probably it ought to also be looking
> at/consuming the urandom seed?
Perhaps. I'm not sure systemd upstream would be convinced though.
--
On Wed, 2019-10-02 at 08:59 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 11:55 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it just be easier to write it one location and replace the
> > other with a symlink to it?
>
> Looks like neither the urandom init script nor systemd-random-seed
> unlink
On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 11:55 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Wouldn't it just be easier to write it one location and replace the
> other with a symlink to it?
Looks like neither the urandom init script nor systemd-random-seed
unlink the file before writing to it, so this could potentially work
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 05:20:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>Package: finish-install
>Version: 2.56
>Severity: important
>Tags: security
>Control: found -1 2.81
>Control: found -1 2.100
>Control: found -1 2.101
>
>finish-install creates a random seed in the location used by the
>urandom init script
On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 17:20 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: finish-install
> Version: 2.56
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
> Control: found -1 2.81
> Control: found -1 2.100
> Control: found -1 2.101
>
> finish-install creates a random seed in the location used by the
> urandom init
Package: finish-install
Version: 2.56
Severity: important
Tags: security
Control: found -1 2.81
Control: found -1 2.100
Control: found -1 2.101
finish-install creates a random seed in the location used by the
urandom init script from the initscripts package. On systemd based
systems,
6 matches
Mail list logo