On Wednesday 03 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
I agree that, in that case, things may be debated as this somewhat
closes things down in a case where there is no strong need.
So, well, I'm ready to discuss about this again. After all, what we
need here is a placeholder and it's quite
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
As you seem to agree with my main argument that there is no need to lock
away meeting logs I have moved them to alioth and adjusted the links on
the Wiki page accordingly. This will allow any team member to chair a
meeting and post logs.
Please
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
The meeting logs are a completely different animal. There is absolutely no
reason why those should be kept in a location that is not accessible to
all team members.
The most likely reason why Christian is using d-i.d.o instead of our old
alioth
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
http://d-i.debian.org/meetings-logs/20090601/log
I realized that meeting-logs was inaccurate as there are many
meetings, so I changed the directory name and links on the wiki page
but omitted to change the link I posted.
No, the original name
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
http://d-i.debian.org/meetings-logs/20090601/log
I realized that meeting-logs was inaccurate as there are many
meetings, so I changed the directory name and links on the wiki page
but omitted to
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Not that important, but isn't logs of the meetings, shortened to
meetings' logs correct English?
It would be correct if you had two directories: ./meetings/logs/
But when combined into a word or phrase (which you effectively do when you
Hi,
On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I disagree with you; while I agree that d-i.alioth.d.o exists for ages
I do believe d-i.debian.org is much nicer for documents and easier to
remember for users. So I see no big issue to use it.
yet more looking for the right ressource for
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I disagree with you; while I agree that d-i.alioth.d.o exists for
ages I do believe d-i.debian.org is much nicer for documents and
easier to remember for users. So I see no big issue to use it.
The bi-monthly D-I team meeting happened today at 20:00UTC.
As usual, the logs are available from
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
Please note that I copied all old logs and minutes to the brand new
d-i.debian.org web tree. They were previously stored in various
developers' home
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please note that I copied all old logs and minutes to the brand new
d-i.debian.org web tree. They were previously stored in various
developers' home directories on people.debian.org with the risk of
losing data in the future, if people clean
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
The bi-monthly D-I team meeting happened today at 20:00UTC.
As usual, the logs are available from
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
http://d-i.debian.org/meeting-logs/20090601/log:
Not Found
The requested URL
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please note that I copied all old logs and minutes to the brand new
d-i.debian.org web tree. They were previously stored in various
developers' home directories on people.debian.org with the risk of
Hello Frans,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please note that I copied all old logs and minutes to the brand new
d-i.debian.org web tree. They were previously
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
On Tuesday 02 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
The bi-monthly D-I team meeting happened today at 20:00UTC.
As usual, the logs are available from
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
http://d-i.debian.org/meeting-logs/20090601/log:
14 matches
Mail list logo
