On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:09:48AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:08:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:18:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 03 August
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
That said, in all those months i maintained the buildds (and i still recent
the way i was summarily dismissed by frans, thank you but we don't need you
anymore, go away right, he), the only problems i saw was with things like abi
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:55:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
That said, in all those months i maintained the buildds (and i still recent
the way i was summarily dismissed by frans, thank you but we don't need you
anymore, go
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:02:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ah, so you don't use a chroot to build the daily builds, naturally, i was
using a chroot which i so updated, not the running system, which was a stable
system anyway.
I believe it is saner and more secure to build the daily builds
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:03:25PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 11:02:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ah, so you don't use a chroot to build the daily builds, naturally, i was
using a chroot which i so updated, not the running system, which was a
stable
system
Hi,
On Thursday 03 August 2006 12:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I don't think it's something at my end, though, rather than changes in
svn which broke the build. Anyone on -boot care to comment?
this seems to be #379878, which is fixed, so I think Wouter only needs to
upgrade rsrce on his
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 03 August 2006 12:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I don't think it's something at my end, though, rather than changes in
svn which broke the build. Anyone on -boot care to comment?
this seems to be #379878, which
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:18:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 03 August 2006 12:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I don't think it's something at my end, though, rather than changes in
svn which broke the
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:08:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:18:44PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 03 August 2006 12:32, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I don't think it's something at
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:27:20AM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:13:01AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:32:41PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Just thought I'd give you a heads up: According to
build_powerpc_floppy_boot.log the build
10 matches
Mail list logo
