On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:59:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:34:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
| If you do DHCP, it gets a hostname from the server, or sometimes falls
| back to a bad default of localhost. This is an area that needs more
|
Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:34:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
| If you do DHCP, it gets a hostname from the server, or sometimes falls
| back to a bad default of localhost. This is an area that needs more
| work still, but in the daily builds you will be prompted for a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:18:28AM +0100, Michael Renner wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for the big improvements to the debian installer (compared to the
one shipped with 3.0), it greatly reduced the amount of time needed to
install debian on boxes with nonstandard hardware (which usually
involves using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmmm, debian-installer is some what targeted to the masses[1] by default.
Pretending that the masses have a DHCP server available is just silly.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On December 17, 2003 05:26 am, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmmm, debian-installer is some what targeted to the masses[1] by default.
Pretending that the masses have a DHCP server available is just silly.
Many of the masses have broadband connections and cheapie routers that
Michael Renner wrote:
*) Lack of keymap selection: I chose English/United states at the first
dialog because I loathe i18n'ed status/error messages. This apparently set
also the keymap to us.
This will be fixed in the next beta.
*) No choice to use manual IP setup when using the net install.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:34:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
| If you do DHCP, it gets a hostname from the server, or sometimes falls
| back to a bad default of localhost. This is an area that needs more
| work still, but in the daily builds you will be prompted for a hostname
| after you reboot if
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
Michael Renner wrote:
You can get the ability to do manual configuration if you boot with
DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium. Whether we should ask about it by default is
debatable, and you'll be asked about several other things that are
similarly grey in that
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:26:33AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmmm, debian-installer is some what targeted to the masses[1] by default.
Pretending that the masses have a DHCP server available is just silly.
The masses my employer services generally have DHCP-serving
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031217 13:48]:
Pretending that the masses have a DHCP server available is just silly.
There is more to configure then the network.
This is a important point. But in my eyes it is a reason to ask more
questions, as daredevil guessing might have a good
Hi!
Thanks for the big improvements to the debian installer (compared to the
one shipped with 3.0), it greatly reduced the amount of time needed to
install debian on boxes with nonstandard hardware (which usually
involves using additional driver floppy disks or temporary installations
on ide
11 matches
Mail list logo
