Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-14 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
As a result of this discussion, I've submitted requests to BTS asking debootstrap to stop installing modconf (#232673), lilo (#232667) and mbr (#232672), and added a patch to the bug asking for syslinux to be dropped as well (#205379). Hopefully the maintainer upload a new version soon. :) --

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Several of the packages in the above list are Priority required, and I feel they should not be removed from the debian base system while they have that priority, as our documentation documents Required packages as packages whose

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:18:27PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: nvi standard, installer do we need that or should nano supperseed it? I'd be very surprised to encounter a Unix system without vi. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:12:08PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:02:52PM +, Colin Watson wrote: I'd be very surprised to encounter a Unix system without vi. vi-clone. Yeah, whatever, near enough. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-02 Thread Joey Hess
Bastian Blank wrote: I'm going to change the behavior for standard and installer bootstraps to install complete required. Minimal and (build-)chroot installs or not affected. Good. I have never seen the point of the mbr package, but whatever. ;-) Standard i386 mbr which jumps into the

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-02 Thread Joey Hess
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Why is slang1 installed? Possibly because tasksel used to link to it. Why are both ipchains and iptables installed? Not sure, maybe bug #134478 would say, but I'm offline. Why is gettext-base installed if nothing depend on it? base-config uses it for i18n. Why

Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The cdeboostrap package seem to improve, and might soon be a useful replacement for debootstrap in d-i. Because of this, I decided it was time to test it a bit more. Luckily it is already in sid, so t was only one 'apt-get install cdebootstrap' away. :) Installing worked just fine, both

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:19:49PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: apt-utils at bsdmainutils cpio cron dhcp-client ed exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-l fdutils gcc-3.2-base gettext-base groff-base ifupdown info ipchains iptables libdb2 libgcrypt1 libgcrypt7 libgdbm3

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-01 Thread Joey Hess
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: The following 55 packages was not installed by cdebootstrap, but installed by debootstrap: apt-utils at bsdmainutils cpio cron dhcp-client ed exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-l fdutils gcc-3.2-base gettext-base groff-base ifupdown info ipchains

Re: Testing cdebootstrap and debootstrap

2004-02-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Petter Reinholdtsen] The following 55 packages was not installed by cdebootstrap, but installed by debootstrap: As a check, I installed deborphan in the debootstrap chroot, and looked at the output from 'deborphan -a', to find out which packages in the chroot that nothing depend on. This is