Cyril Brulebois:
> Simon McVittie (2019-06-04):
>> Please unblock package glib2.0 to fix CVE-2019-12450.
>>
>> glib2.0 builds a udeb (for the graphical installer) so this will need
>> a d-i ack.
>>
>> unblock glib2.0/2.58.3-2
>> unblock-udeb glib2.0
Simon McVittie (2019-06-04):
> Please unblock package glib2.0 to fix CVE-2019-12450.
>
> glib2.0 builds a udeb (for the graphical installer) so this will need
> a d-i ack.
>
> unblock glib2.0/2.58.3-2
> unblock-udeb glib2.0/2.58.3-2
Tests look good, no objections from t
.
unblock glib2.0/2.58.3-2
unblock-udeb glib2.0/2.58.3-2
Thanks,
smcv
diffstat for glib2.0-2.58.3 glib2.0-2.58.3
changelog | 14
patches/gfile-Limit-access-to-files-when-copying.patch | 54 +
patches/series
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1]
Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing?
Unblocked, after ack from Otavio.
You'll need to get ftp-master to remove the old libgio-fam binaries on
the Linux
Hi,
glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1]
Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing?
Thanks,
Emilio
[1] http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
unblock them?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
unblock them?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
them?
Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
them?
Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive we're ok to go with
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
them?
Ack; since major issues has been
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
them?
Ack; since
Hi,
glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
them?
After that, the road is open for GTK+ 2.14 in unstable and GTK+ 2.12.12
in lenny, as discussed before.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Debian 5.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
