Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-29 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:54:38PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug.

Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the bogl and bterm in that package, so that we

Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)

2001-01-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug. I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using