Re: libutf8, bogl, bgf fonts and tools vs boot-floppies

2001-05-28 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 28 May 2001 02:12:55 +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:00:16AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: I have asked before, but never received a satisfactory answer, what you should do if you want a standard UTF-8 locale. Probably there should be something like

Re: libutf8, bogl, bgf fonts and tools vs boot-floppies

2001-05-27 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We need to have the stuff in subject included in bf bould process somehow. The question is: how? AFAIK bterm has its own package (bogl-bterm), as does bdf fonts' source. (Now we either need to put libutf8 in its package or make bterm work without it

Re: libutf8, bogl, bgf fonts and tools vs boot-floppies

2001-05-27 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:28:10PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: No, the latter. Since I did it several months ago; see bogl-bterm's changelog. Oops. Wait. I forgot to upload that; I'm sorry. I'll do it soon. I may have committed a fix for the same bug today. Please

Re: libutf8, bogl, bgf fonts and tools vs boot-floppies

2001-05-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:28:10PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We need to have the stuff in subject included in bf bould process somehow. The question is: how? AFAIK bterm has its own package (bogl-bterm), as does bdf fonts' source. (Now we

Re: libutf8, bogl, bgf fonts and tools vs boot-floppies

2001-05-27 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:00:16AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: I have asked before, but never received a satisfactory answer, what you should do if you want a standard UTF-8 locale. Probably there should be something like C.UTF-8. Right, but there is no C.whatever locale in