Re: Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > > partman-zfs is kfreebsd-* only; others are powerpc-specific, which is no > > > longer a release architecture. Christian, which update would be the best > > > one to reflect those changes? Add a minus sign after those packages in > > >

Re: Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

Christian PERRIER (2017-06-26): > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > > Current errors are: > > E: error getting madison info for partman-newworld for 'testing' > > E: error getting madison info for partman-zfs for 'testing' > > E: error getting madison info for

Re: Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > Current errors are: > E: error getting madison info for partman-newworld for 'testing' > E: error getting madison info for partman-zfs for 'testing' > E: error getting madison info for prep-installer for 'testing' > E: error getting madison info for

Speeding up l10n/calc-release-status

taken an easier route and split the interesting part into a calc-release-status-helper script, to be called for each and every package. Now, calc-release-status will treat packages in a parallel manner, using as many cores as available, and it now finishes in under 3 minutes on my d-i development

Bug#762055: marked as done (d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-status regularly to catch missing tags)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jun 2017 03:21:35 +0200 with message-id <20170625012135.ga...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#762055: d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-status regularly to catch missing tags has caused the Debian Bug report #762055, regarding d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-

Bug#763578: d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-status in a crontab

Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2014-10-01): Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): Package: d-i.debian.org Severity: normal Every time a release is getting prepared one has to run calc-release-status, which can: 1) take a while; 2) and most annoyingly: fail because

Bug#763578: d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-status in a crontab

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): Package: d-i.debian.org Severity: normal Every time a release is getting prepared one has to run calc-release-status, which can: 1) take a while; 2) and most annoyingly: fail because of a missing tag and similar things. It's a usual source

Bug#763578: d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-status in a crontab

Package: d-i.debian.org Severity: normal Every time a release is getting prepared one has to run calc-release-status, which can: 1) take a while; 2) and most annoyingly: fail because of a missing tag and similar things. It's a usual source of frustration and time loss when stuff should just

Bug#762055: d-i.debian.org: run calc-release-status regularly to catch missing tags

Package: d-i.debian.org Severity: normal Part of a debian-installer upload is about including a file computed by calc-release-status; it's somewhat frustrating to see it fail because this or that tag wasn't pushed to a repository, meaning a failed checkout/translation lookup for said package

Bug#757985: kfreebsd-* release status?

On 19/08/14 00:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [ I'm adding -release@ to the loop. I tried to refrain from mentioning my concerns in the Jessie Beta 1 announce, that's why I used a quite neutral wording, but let's be honest: kfreebsd-* is looking bad right now. ] I was drafting a quite long reply

Bug#757985: kfreebsd-* release status? (was: #757985: kfreebsd: d-i hangs)

[ I'm adding -release@ to the loop. I tried to refrain from mentioning my concerns in the Jessie Beta 1 announce, that's why I used a quite neutral wording, but let's be honest: kfreebsd-* is looking bad right now. ] Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-08-14): Steven Chamberlain

Re: Etch Beta 3 release - status update

On Friday 07 July 2006 00:01, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:29, Frans Pop wrote: I will post a more detailed release plan as soon as it is clear when the 2.6.16 kernel packages will migrate to testing. Some information about Beta 3 is already available from [1]. As this has

Etch Beta 3 release - status update

On Thursday 22 June 2006 22:29, Frans Pop wrote: I will post a more detailed release plan as soon as it is clear when the 2.6.16 kernel packages will migrate to testing. Some information about Beta 3 is already available from [1]. As this has not yet happened, there is no real progress on the

Re: Etch Beta 3 release - status update

Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): There is some activity to resolve the issues around 2.6.16, but there is also a real chance that the migration will not happen and that we will have to cancel Beta 3. Does this mean that Etch would be released with 2.6.15? Or cancelling Beta3 is more

Re: release status

On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:52:24AM +0200, Christian Leimer wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:18:09PM +0200, Christian Leimer wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, Well, i have no idea what you are

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: John Summerfield wrote: I set out to find whether the new manual provides that kind of information, or pointer to where it may be found. In the course of my search I have discovered: a) http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.arm/apas03.html contains links to a.1 The Multi

Re: release status

On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:18:09PM +0200, Christian Leimer wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, Well, i have no idea what you are trying to do, but my guess is that you are not looking in the right place. The miboot 2.4

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: http://dragon/~joey/blog/entry/d-i_retrospective-2004-08-07-19-46 I guess anyone not on my home network would prefer this url: http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/d-i_retrospective-2004-08-07-19-46 A partcular concern I have is the reason for so many

Re: release status

John Summerfield wrote: I set out to find whether the new manual provides that kind of information, or pointer to where it may be found. In the course of my search I have discovered: a) http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.arm/apas03.html contains links to a.1 The Multi Disk HOWTO

Re: release status

Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:18:09PM +0200, Christian Leimer wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, Well, i have no idea what you are trying to do, but my guess is that you are not looking in the right place.

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: John Summerfield wrote: I set out to find whether the new manual provides that kind of information, or pointer to where it may be found. In the course of my search I have discovered: a) http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.arm/apas03.html contains links to a.1 The Multi

Re: release status

Hi, Well, i have no idea what you are trying to do, but my guess is that you are not looking in the right place. The miboot 2.4 floppies are at : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc-small/floppy/ hmm the boot.img from 2004-08-06, 21:24 (still) doesn't boot and the

Re: release status (checklist)

Hi, On Tuesday 03 August 2004 16:43, Joey Hess wrote: The test checklist in installer/doc/checklist is still missing many entries and the more complete it is the better I'd feel about calling this release rc1 instead of beta5. If you'll send me a pointer (URL?) to the test

Re: release status (checklist)

Holger Levsen wrote: 1. is it true, that if 32mb ram installs work, 48mb will always work, too ? No. The system only enters lowmem mode at a given cutoff point, so we have to test the lowest supported amount of memory, as well as making sure that the cutoff point is at a place where there is

Re: release status

On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, Well, i have no idea what you are trying to do, but my guess is that you are not looking in the right place. The miboot 2.4 floppies are at : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc-small/floppy/

Re: release status

Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:02:31PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, Well, i have no idea what you are trying to do, but my guess is that you are not looking in the right place. The miboot 2.4 floppies are at :

Re: release status

I've released d-i rc1. Great job! Also, some may find this worth reading: http://dragon/~joey/blog/entry/d-i_retrospective-2004-08-07-19-46 Would someone who was active while I wasn't working on d-i like to fill in the gap? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: http://dragon/~joey/blog/entry/d-i_retrospective-2004-08-07-19-46 I guess anyone not on my home network would prefer this url: http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/d-i_retrospective-2004-08-07-19-46 -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: release status

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 03 August 2004 05:55, Joey Hess wrote: At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24

Re: release status

Yet another update: We seem to be on schedule for a release tomorrow. All images are built except for full CDs (building for next 24+ hours). To do prerelease testing, use the 20040801 images from the archive, and the 20040806 arge_d-i CDs. Official release will be after dinstall tomorrow. --

Re: release status

On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:07:21AM +0200, Christian Leimer wrote: Since the most oldworld use scsi to boot it is very important that this works. Maybe 2.4 should be the standard for oldworld macs since I have a lot of problems getting a 2.6 kernel to work with quik. 2.4 is the

Re: release status

At 3 Aug 04 03:55:21 GMT, Joey Hess wrote: At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24 hours, we've gotten builds for hppa, ia64, s390, and

Re: release status

Kenshi Muto wrote: Well, what's current status of d-i release...? We delay some days. From [1], arm and mipsel seem need to build. Is this a show stopper? We got the last of the initrd builds today, it's just waiting on the ftp-master to move them into place, and then the CD builds. -- see

Re: release status

Hi, At 6 Aug 04 04:23:48 GMT, Joey Hess wrote: Kenshi Muto wrote: Well, what's current status of d-i release...? We delay some days. From [1], arm and mipsel seem need to build. Is this a show stopper? We got the last of the initrd builds today, it's just waiting on the ftp-master to

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken If you choose to manually configure the network (don't use DHCP) the installer keeps coming back to the configure network step, and if you force it to move forward, after the reboot, the network is

Re: release status

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:48:32PM +0200, Christian Leimer wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken If you choose to manually configure the network (don't use DHCP) the installer keeps coming back to the configure network step,

Re: release status

Since the most oldworld use scsi to boot it is very important that this works. Maybe 2.4 should be the standard for oldworld macs since I have a lot of problems getting a 2.6 kernel to work with quik. 2.4 is the default for the miboot oldworld floppies, which are the default oldworld

Re: release status (checklist)

Rick Thomas wrote: Joey Hess wrote: The test checklist in installer/doc/checklist is still missing many entries and the more complete it is the better I'd feel about calling this release rc1 instead of beta5. If you'll send me a pointer (URL?) to the test checklist, I'll try to

Re: release status

Rick Thomas wrote: Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken If you choose to manually configure the network (don't use DHCP) the installer keeps coming back to the configure network step, and if you force it to move forward, after the reboot, the network is not configured.

Re: release status OldWorld PowerPC mesh scsi

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:51, Joey Hess wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken If you choose to manually configure the network (don't use DHCP) the installer keeps coming back to the configure network step, and if you force it to move forward,

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24 hours, we've gotten builds for hppa, ia64, s390, and sparc, plus a manual build for

release status

At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24 hours, we've gotten builds for hppa, ia64, s390, and sparc, plus a manual build for alpha. That leaves

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24 hours, we've gotten builds for hppa, ia64, s390, and sparc, plus a manual build

Re: release status

OOOps... I accidentally hit send when I meant to hit save... Here's the complete message as I intended it to be! Rick Joey Hess wrote: At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to catch up

Re: release status (checklist)

Joey Hess wrote: The test checklist in installer/doc/checklist is still missing many entries and the more complete it is the better I'd feel about calling this release rc1 instead of beta5. If you'll send me a pointer (URL?) to the test checklist, I'll try to make sure that it gets as done

release status update

I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to retry, but this will likely delay things for a few days. At this point it's

Re: release status update

On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:11:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to retry, but this

discover on powerbook [was: Re: release status update]

Il dom, 2004-04-25 alle 00:13, Petter Reinholdtsen ha scritto: [Giuseppe Sacco] A second problem I understand only now is that the powerpc discover we have in testing now is broken: every time I switch on my laptop (powerbook g4, 15, 867Mhz) it hangs when discover run and probe for

Bug#237603: release status update

I just upgraded to discover 2.0.4-3 with discover-data 2.2004.04.09-1 and it seems that the problem is fixed. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release status update

Steve Langasek wrote: - qlogicisp driver doesn't work right with many (most?) SCSI cards; bug #238593 et al. - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha kernels; bug #228654. Both of these sound like reasonable

Re: release status update

- both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha kernels; bug #228654. Both of these sound like reasonable candidates for errata if they're not fixed, and not release blockers. Do you want them in the errata? does

Re: release status update

On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:54:18PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: - qlogicisp driver doesn't work right with many (most?) SCSI cards; bug #238593 et al. - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha

Re: release status update

On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 12:16:44PM -0500, elijah wright wrote: - both the de4x5 and the tulip drivers fail to work with many DECChip-based ethernet cards in the 2.4.2x series alpha kernels; bug #228654. Both of these sound like reasonable candidates for errata if they're not

Re: release status update

Il gio, 2004-04-22 alle 18:55, Joey Hess ha scritto: [...] - powerpc: need list of working subarches (oldworld?) I would like to have powerpc release only after having kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-* version 2.4.25-8 in testing because of #245012. A second problem I understand only now is

Re: release status update

[Giuseppe Sacco] A second problem I understand only now is that the powerpc discover we have in testing now is broken: every time I switch on my laptop (powerbook g4, 15, 867Mhz) it hangs when discover run and probe for parallel port devices. This means that I have to press the keyboard

Re: release status update

Giuseppe Sacco wrote: I would like to have powerpc release only after having kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-* version 2.4.25-8 in testing because of #245012. If I'm expanding yuor wildcard correctly, they seem to go in tonight/tomorrow. Anyway, you have several days to get them in, but this does

Re: release status update

* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-22 22:15]: was loaded since it has a different sub-architecture (however, iirc, delo-installer is also loaded on Cobalt, so I assume sub-arch handling is broken). Argh, not again. libdebian-installer 0.22 went into the archive today with some fixes

Re: release status update

* tbm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-23 01:43]: - arm: ? arm/netwinder most definitely works. It worked recently and there is It works; the only problem I had was that the wrong kernel was installed. For some reason, debian-installer/kernel/subarchitecture was not set. Unfortunately,

Re: release status update

Martin Michlmayr wrote: * tbm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-23 01:43]: - arm: ? arm/netwinder most definitely works. It worked recently and there is It works; the only problem I had was that the wrong kernel was installed. For some reason,

Re: release status update

* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-23 16:32]: Does archdetect show the correct output for netwinder? Yes. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release status update

* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-22 22:15]: Argh, not again. libdebian-installer 0.22 went into the archive today with some fixes for subarch handling, in particular #243692. Was that version on your image? I tried it with 0.22 now and still see the same... it's quite strange. Just for

Re: release status update

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:55:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I'm trying to track status of various architectures at the top of TODO, here is what I have so far. - ia64: There is a devpts/sysvinit/glibc file conflict of some sort that breaks debootstrap. Need a bug #.

release status update

Today's the last day of the string freeze, leaving this left in the timeline for release: 23 aprilupload translated udebs to archive 23 aprilwrite release announcement 24 aprillast possible changes to udebs on initrds 25 aprilinitrd builds 26 aprilinitrd

Re: release status update

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:55:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: - m68k: need list of working subarches mac and amiga are fully supported. I hope to have support for the rest in the next couple of weeks or so, but if they aren't ready for release, so be it. -- Stephen R. Marenka If

Re: release status update

* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-22 12:55]: - mipsel: looks good I just did a successful installation on a DECstation 5000/133 via the serial console. Everything worked fine, apart from one thing: both colo-installer and delo-installer got loaded, and colo-installer was executed

Re: release status update

* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-22 12:55]: I'm trying to track status of various architectures at the top of TODO, here is what I have so far. - arm: ? arm/netwinder most definitely works. It worked recently and there is afaict nothing that broke it in the meantime. arm/bast

Re: release status update

Martin Michlmayr wrote: I just did a successful installation on a DECstation 5000/133 via the serial console. Everything worked fine, apart from one thing: both colo-installer and delo-installer got loaded, and colo-installer was executed instead of delo-installer. I have no idea why

Re: release status

On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 11:26:31PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il dom, 2004-03-14 alle 21:00, Joey Hess ha scritto: [...] powerpc: autobuilding. kdb-chooser, airport wifi (#237894) What is the problem with autobuilding? I don't know if that port still uses the kernel I compile,

Re: release status

Il mar, 2004-03-16 alle 10:05, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 11:26:31PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il dom, 2004-03-14 alle 21:00, Joey Hess ha scritto: [...] powerpc: autobuilding. kdb-chooser, airport wifi (#237894) What is the problem with autobuilding?

Re: release status

On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Assuming we release tomorrow, the deadline is now past for changes to udebs that go in the initrds. All translations are uploaded. The string freeze is over. Please limit changes to important fixes. If there are any final fixes to

Re: release status

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Assuming we release tomorrow, the deadline is now past for changes to I couldn't find the release annoucement file you mentioned me yesterday on IRC, and I lost my logs for checkingI remember you mentioning some file in doc/. Where is it ? -- To

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:13:19AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: If we release the CDs tomorrow, please note that a missing s390 upload blocks packages tasksel and shadow from entering testing. Both are marked as installed in w-b. Bastian -- No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose.

Re: release status

Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Assuming we release tomorrow, the deadline is now past for changes to I couldn't find the release annoucement file you mentioned me yesterday on IRC, and I lost my logs for

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:09:42PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Bastian Blank] Both are marked as installed in w-b. I'm not sure what that means. Does that give us anything we can use to find out where the binaries are? It means that w-b saw it in the parsed Packages file. Bastian

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:27:00AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: file you mentioned me yesterday on IRC, It's good you mentioned it. Which IRC channel do you use? -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:50:55PM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: file you mentioned me yesterday on IRC, It's good you mentioned it. Which IRC channel do you use? Forget it, I should have looked before I asked... :( -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:14:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:09:42PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Bastian Blank] Both are marked as installed in w-b. I'm not sure what that means. Does that give us anything we can use to find out where the binaries

Re: release status

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:13:39PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:14:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:09:42PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Bastian Blank] Both are marked as installed in w-b. I'm not sure what that means. Does

Re: release status

Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Forget it, I should have looked before I asked... :( When it comes to me, don't expect me online very often on IRCI still get connection problems for getting what I consider a good IRC client (gaim) connected though a SSH tunnel when I'm at

release status

Assuming we release tomorrow, the deadline is now past for changes to udebs that go in the initrds. All translations are uploaded. The string freeze is over. Please limit changes to important fixes. If there are any final fixes to build/, add them soon; I upload the final cut of that tonight for

Re: release status

Thus spake Joey Hess: Assuming we release tomorrow, the deadline is now past for changes to udebs that go in the initrds. All translations are uploaded. The string freeze is over. Please limit changes to important fixes. If there are any final fixes to build/, add them soon; I upload the final

Re: release status

Nathan Poznick wrote: Out of curiosity, was anything figured out on bug #232415? Not that I know of except that for some reason the dev files are missing for cciss drives (whatever those are). Sounds like it's a bug in debootstrap or makedev. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: release status

Il dom, 2004-03-14 alle 21:00, Joey Hess ha scritto: [...] powerpc: autobuilding. kdb-chooser, airport wifi (#237894) What is the problem with autobuilding? I don't know if that port still uses the kernel I compile, but I had some problem lately and I manage to put it up again two days

Re: release status

Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il dom, 2004-03-14 alle 21:00, Joey Hess ha scritto: [...] powerpc: autobuilding. kdb-chooser, airport wifi (#237894) What is the problem with autobuilding? Nothing. That means it is autobuilding. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#237534: release status

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:10:37AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-12 10:04]: A lot of your problems sound like they stemmed from the wrong partition type for the partition you wanted to use as a physical volume, but then 83 is a short typo from

Re: release status

* Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-07 13:38]: I've uploaded a package with your patch. I tested the daily build for 20040305, which included lvmcfg 0.17, and it now works properly, lvm10 is installed on a system that uses LVM. And that works for you? The LVM is created is

Re: release status

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:56:07PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-07 13:38]: I've uploaded a package with your patch. I tested the daily build for 20040305, which included lvmcfg 0.17, and it now works properly, lvm10 is installed on a system

Bug#237534: release status

* Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-12 10:04]: A lot of your problems sound like they stemmed from the wrong partition type for the partition you wanted to use as a physical volume, but then 83 is a short typo from 8e, so you may have had it right. Oh, I wrote 83... yes, that's a

Re: release status update

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: 3. at least one successful installation report per boot method I have not had time to track installation reports. Could someone take a pass through the list of recent reports and post a summary to the list please? My vague

Re: release status update

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:29:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: [...] The string freeze has not quite started, since a few strings were changed today. Hopefully we've seen the last of that I also just rewrote most of the strings for the cdebconf text frontend. They should certainly be reviewed by a

Re: release status update

Sven Luther wrote: chrp, chrp-rs6k and prep will be working this time around, i think everything is there, but i need to fiddle the build system for it still to build the initrd images, but i do this already by hand, and everything is in place for it. This would use the powerpc netboot

Re: release status update (grub notes)

- lowmem package must enter archive - Check archive for udebs that need to be built on various arches; make sure everything is up-to-date. Also, make sure that eg, appropriate kernel debs have entered the archive on each architecture. one thing I noticed with a recent daily build

Re: Re: release status

Peter Karbaliotis wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:34:09PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: demo must be disabled in config/sparc.cfg. I took the right to do it in CVS. Hmm, that must make the debian-installer-demo

Re: Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:34:09PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: demo must be disabled in config/sparc.cfg. I took the right to do it in CVS. Hmm, that must make the debian-installer-demo package rather useless.

release status update

I wrote: We're still on track for release on the 15th. Here's a schedule up to then: March 3rd No changes to libraries past this point. March 6th Final code changes for i386 enter the archive. (except new udebs and possibly partman) March 7th All

Re: release status

Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:34:09PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: demo must be disabled in config/sparc.cfg. I took the right to do it in CVS. Hmm, that must make the debian-installer-demo package rather useless. yes, I didn't realize

Re: release status

Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:34:09PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote: Thomas Poindessous wrote: demo must be disabled in config/sparc.cfg. I took the right to do it in CVS. Hmm, that must make the debian-installer-demo package rather useless. yes, I didn't

Re: release status

Peter Karbaliotis wrote: Please see Bug #236364 for my sparc installation report (just made yesterday). Looks like you're close.. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: release status

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:12:59PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: I've uploaded a package with your patch. I tested the daily build for 20040305, which included lvmcfg 0.17, and it now works properly, lvm10 is installed on a system that uses LVM. Thanks. Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: release status

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:05:25PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: - Make sure the debian-installer package builds for your arch in a clean chroot, and let me know so I can add your architecture to the control file. Currently

  1   2   >