hat:
> upload to unstable, and then I will do some tests.
I found that there are some additional changings needed to get the desired
results (bad research on my side, sorry!).
I just did another tasksel upload (3.67), to get that fixed.
A diff is attached.
However, there was the need of anot
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 01:20:31AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Holger Wansing (2021-04-15):
>
>Oh, that part totally slipped my mind. I'd be happy to advocate you if
>you ever decide to start the NM process.
Definitely! Well overdue IMHO... :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
Holger Wansing (2021-04-15):
> Could someone upload tasksel 3.66 for me, please?
Done with a source+binaries upload, thanks!
bullseye's lintian spots those when building the source package, but
that doesn't seem quite important at this stage, so I definitely won't
block on it:
W: tasksel
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:55:34 +0200):
> Hi Holger,
>
> On 10-04-2021 18:14, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >>> 2. A problem came up during freeze regarding input methods for several
> >>>languages:
> >>>Starting with bullseye, GNOME depends on ibus, which is not fully
> >>>
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (2019-08-12):
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> for your latest "tasksel" upload, the corresponding tag is still missing:
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/tags
>
> Could you please add it?
> Thanks
I just noticed, there is again s
Hi Nicolas,
for your latest "tasksel" upload, the corresponding tag is still missing:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/tags
Could you please add it?
Thanks
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Hi,
I've made some changes to tasksel recently, which I've pushed to the
repository. As there were some errors when pushing, I guess no mail was sent
to the list (not sure if it's usually the case anyway), so I'm sending a mail
to notify you. There's no urgency to the upload.
Here is the
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:48:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bastian Blank wrote:
Is there anything that speaks against an upload of tasksel? It works
fine in my tests.
This heuristic is just asking for trouble.
# Exclude packages starting with lib
Bastian Blank wrote:
Is there anything that speaks against an upload of tasksel? It works
fine in my tests.
This heuristic is just asking for trouble.
# Exclude packages starting with lib
$package !~ /^lib/
Only other concerning thing
Hi
Is there anything that speaks against an upload of tasksel? It works
fine in my tests.
Okay, #676777 in debhelper needs to be fixed also.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
-- Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3201.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
console-cyrillic from russian and ukrainian tasks.
Closes: #545715
[ Kenshi Muto ]
* Replace jfbterm with fbterm for japanese task.
* Add otf-ipafont to japanese-desktop task.
Could it be a good time for a tasksel upload, before a supposedly
coming alpha 1?
I think so. It will also allow
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
If you can take care of it, it would be nice. Otherwise ping me and I do it.
Ping..:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
If you can take care of it, it would be nice. Otherwise ping me and I do it.
Ping..:-)
Pong :-)
I did the upload already.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S.
jfbterm with fbterm for japanese task.
* Add otf-ipafont to japanese-desktop task.
Could it be a good time for a tasksel upload, before a supposedly
coming alpha 1?
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
