also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.07.13.1938 +0200]:
Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is that the
changelog has made the BTS believe that mdadm 2.6.9-3 is
a descendent of 3.0~devel3-1, and thus affected by #526806.
Hm, so the BTS pays attention to
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
[2009.07.13.1938 +0200]:
Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is that the
changelog has made the BTS believe that mdadm 2.6.9-3 is
a descendent of 3.0~devel3-1, and thus affected by #526806.
[...]
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, martin f krafft wrote:
Hm, so the BTS pays attention to changelog stanza order (which is
chronological)
It's not necessarily chronological.
without differentiating between experimental and unstable?
Sort of. See http://wiki.debian.org/BugsVersionTracking part two.
In
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.07.14.1020 +0200]:
Not quite. It needs to be marked as /fixed/ in 2.6.9-3, rather than
notfound.
notfound simply removes the version from the list of versions in
which the bug has been explicitly marked as present; it has no effect
also sprach Don Armstrong d...@debian.org [2009.07.14.1125 +0200]:
Hm, so the BTS pays attention to changelog stanza order (which is
chronological)
It's not necessarily chronological.
It was in this case.
If you're uploading experimental packages, the penultimate version
should either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes:
Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
Ack
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes:
Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
Ack
Already unblocked since May 26th ...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 19:19 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes:
Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
Ack
Already unblocked since May 26th ...
Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is
Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft madd...@d.o Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have
... has been in testing for 20 days. Should not affect d-i.
mdadm (2.6.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix the multipath prereq patch (#516605) and make it exit after printing
the prerequisites (closes: #526793).
* Change my previous recommendation for postfix over to the new virtual
martin f krafft wrote:
... has been in testing for 20 days. Should not affect d-i.
unblocked
cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
