Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-05-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:09:35PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem in bogl-bterm which impede bterm working without libutf8. So do we actually stick to libutf8 or try to

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-05-27 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: As I said on this list several times, I would appreciate it if someone would make boot floppies use libbogl0 and bogl-bterm instead. It's on my TODO list. I would have done it today, but the build takes much longer then I

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-05-27 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:09:35PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem in bogl-bterm which impede bterm

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-05-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:22:52PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: As I said on this list several times, I would appreciate it if someone would make boot floppies use libbogl0 and bogl-bterm instead. Every patch that goes in to

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-05-26 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem in bogl-bterm which impede bterm working without libutf8. So do we actually stick to libutf8 or try to make it work with glibc? We make it work with glibc. Done. CVS log for

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-05-23 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:07:22AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem in bogl-bterm which impede bterm working without libutf8. So do we actually stick to libutf8 or try to make it work with glibc? Marcin -- Marcin

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-04-23 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi, Enrique. I've checked your rebuilt packages, and it seems to work. In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:20:37 +0100, on Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support), Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:11:29AM

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-04-20 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:11:29AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: [...] Hi, Enrique. As far as I checked, this libnewt-utf8-0 does not work with the utf8 enabled slang1 packages above (pppconfig failed at internal error). Please rebuilt them with the new slang1 packages, and then upload them.

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-04-20 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Peter Novodvorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So we should provide libutf8 package, or make bogl-bterm statically linked to libutf8 library. Bruno Haible's page states that libutf8 is needed only libc versions below 2.2. So, 2.2.2-4 should work fine. This is correct. I stopped using libutf8

Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support)

2001-04-19 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Taketoshi Sano [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, when we'll get those utf8-enabled slang1 and newt packages, we might also need bogl-bterm to show utf8 messages. And it requires libutf8 (and the root priviledge) to work well even on the current unstable (i.e. with our libc6_2.2.2-4 package).