Bug#594461: apt-setup: Should propose using t-p-u when testing is installed

2010-08-27 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org): Does it really make sense for users to use t-p-u? Anything can be uploaded there, rejected by the release team, and no upgrade path is necessarily provided for a system that installed a package from there and ends up tracking stable. Well, after thinking

Re: Bug#594461: apt-setup: Should propose using t-p-u when testing is installed

2010-08-27 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Fre Aug 27 06:56:44 +0200 2010: Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org): Does it really make sense for users to use t-p-u? Anything can be uploaded there, rejected by the release team, and no upgrade path is necessarily provided for a system that

Processing of kernel-wedge_2.67_amd64.changes

2010-08-27 Thread Archive Administrator
kernel-wedge_2.67_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: kernel-wedge_2.67.dsc kernel-wedge_2.67.tar.gz kernel-wedge_2.67_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processing of kernel-wedge_2.67_amd64.changes

2010-08-27 Thread Archive Administrator
kernel-wedge_2.67_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-wedge_2.67.dsc kernel-wedge_2.67.tar.gz kernel-wedge_2.67_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

kernel-wedge_2.67_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-08-27 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: kernel-wedge_2.67.dsc to main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.67.dsc kernel-wedge_2.67.tar.gz to main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.67.tar.gz kernel-wedge_2.67_all.deb to main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.67_all.deb Override entries for your package: kernel-wedge_2.67.dsc -

Re: udeb unblock: partman-md

2010-08-27 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Hi, partman-md fixes an RC bug (#591917).  Would it be ok to unblock it? Ack (just did it on IRC) -- Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br 

Bug#594588: installation-reports

2010-08-27 Thread Thomas Otto
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Squeeze Netinst CD AMD64 alpha1 Image version: alpha1 Date: 27.Aug 2010 Machine: Dell Poweredge R710 Processor: Xeon X5600 Series Memory: 32GB Partitions: makes no sense here Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): installation failes so, makes no

Re: Bug#594461: apt-setup: Should propose using t-p-u when testing is installed

2010-08-27 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org): What's the rationale for adding t-p-u? IMO t-p-u is quite different That came from a remark by Russ Albery who mentioned that t-p-u packages do not receive enough testing to imagine that, during freezes, maintainers are more encouraged to use

Bug#594588: installation-reports

2010-08-27 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Thomas Otto (thomas.o...@exedio.com): Package: installation-reports Boot method: Squeeze Netinst CD AMD64 alpha1 Image version: alpha1 Date: 27.Aug 2010 Machine: Dell Poweredge R710 Processor: Xeon X5600 Series Memory: 32GB Partitions: makes no sense here Output of lspci

Processed: reassign 591393 to partman-base

2010-08-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 591393 partman-base Bug #591393 [partman] partmen: Debian netinstall stops at partman on SCSI drives. Warning: Unknown package 'partman' Bug reassigned from package 'partman' to 'partman-base'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processing of netcfg_1.56_amd64.changes

2010-08-27 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: netcfg_1.56.dsc netcfg_1.56.tar.gz netcfg_1.56_amd64.udeb netcfg-static_1.56_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Processing of netcfg_1.56_amd64.changes

2010-08-27 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_1.56.dsc netcfg_1.56.tar.gz netcfg_1.56_amd64.udeb netcfg-static_1.56_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

netcfg_1.56_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-08-27 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: netcfg-static_1.56_amd64.udeb to main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.56_amd64.udeb netcfg_1.56.dsc to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.56.dsc netcfg_1.56.tar.gz to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.56.tar.gz netcfg_1.56_amd64.udeb to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.56_amd64.udeb Override entries for your

Bug#594616: busybox-syslogd: typos in initscript messages

2010-08-27 Thread Eric Cooper
Package: busybox-syslogd Version: 1:1.17.1-2 Severity: minor busybox' syslogd implementation should be either busybox's syslogd implementation if you want the correct possessive form, or just busybox syslogd implmentation if you want to use busybox as just an adjective modifying syslogd. I

Bug#594461: apt-setup: Should propose using t-p-u when testing is installed

2010-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Christian PERRIER wrote: Well, after thinking a little bit more, I wonder if the case of users installing testing *and then* wanting to track stable is really what we want to address here. And I also wonder whether that happens often (that someone installs testing and then sticks to stable