base-installer_1.182_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.182.dsc
base-installer_1.182.tar.xz
base-installer_1.182_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Hello,
I'm looking to preseed an installer for a cluster, but I'd like all machines to
boot from ZFS roots. [The best recommendation I've found][1] wants me to boot a
LiveCD, install ZFS, setup the zpool, and the `chroot` in and repeat the
installation manually. This seems really tedious and
Hi,
Bailey Parker (2018-08-10):
> Is there a sane way to go about adding ZFS root support to my preseeded
> install or should I abandon this and wait for better support? If the
> latter, are there steps I could take to add better support given my
> limited knowledge of d-i?
I'm afraid we're
On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 12:21 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
> Changed boot mode to
> 1) Legacy External Device Boot Mode, Secure Boot OFF
[...]
This sounds like BIOS emulation, which is not really recommended on
current UEFI systems.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Time is nature's way of making
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:45:59 +0200
Source: apt-setup
Binary: apt-setup-udeb apt-mirror-setup apt-cdrom-setup
Architecture: source
Version: 1:0.142
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 22:28:14 +0200
Source: base-installer
Binary: base-installer bootstrap-base
Architecture: source
Version: 1.182
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Debian FTP Masters (2018-08-09):
> > anna (1.68) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Team upload
> > .
> >[ Cyril Brulebois ]
> >* Update Vcs-{Browser,Git} to point to salsa (alioth's replacement).
> > .
> >[ Updated translations ]
> >*
apt-setup_0.142_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.142.dsc
apt-setup_0.142.tar.xz
apt-setup_0.142_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Debian FTP Masters (2018-08-09):
> anna (1.68) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Team upload
> .
>[ Cyril Brulebois ]
>* Update Vcs-{Browser,Git} to point to salsa (alioth's replacement).
> .
>[ Updated translations ]
>* Hebrew (he.po) by Yaron Shahrabani
Congratulations!
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400
> schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen):
>
> > [...]
> > Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system,
>^
> Interesting. How did you get that
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:21:03PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Package: installation-report
>
> Summary: Customer did what hardware vendor should have done
>
> The original plan was to order a XPS 15 pre-install with Linux.
>
..
>
> The Dell XPS 15 9570 now runs Debian Buster. What
Am Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:00:31 -0400
schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen):
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> > Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400
> > schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen):
> >
> > > [...]
> > > Well 99.9%
On 2018-08-10 04:51 PM, Bailey Parker wrote:
I'd like to somehow modify the installer ISO that I create when preseeding to
include ZFS (so that before the package manager is configured, a ZFS pool can
be created), replace the partman step with some custom scripting that [creates
a zpool and sets
debootstrap_1.0.107.dsc has incorrect md5 checksum; deleting it
debootstrap_1.0.107_amd64.buildinfo has incorrect md5 checksum; deleting it
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
debootstrap_1.0.107_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.107.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.107.tar.gz
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.107_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.107_all.deb
debootstrap_1.0.107_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 01:32:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bailey Parker (2018-08-10):
> > Is there a sane way to go about adding ZFS root support to my preseeded
> > install or should I abandon this and wait for better support? If the
> > latter, are there steps I could take to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:12:20 +0900
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.107
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
On 08/11/2018 01:56 AM, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> Why I care at all: In the past, I used to test the Debian installer on
> my main computer as it was the only one with up to date hardware, and I
> had on it my working OS and a spare installation, and one or two DI
> test installations. I found it
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.106
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers xenial-updates
APT policy: (500, 'xenial-updates'), (500, 'xenial-security'), (500,
'xenial'), (100, 'xenial-backports')
Architecture: amd64
debootstrap_1.0.107.dsc has incorrect md5 checksum; deleting it
debootstrap_1.0.107_amd64.buildinfo has incorrect md5 checksum; deleting it
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Sat, 11 Aug 2018 04:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#893713: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.107
has caused the Debian Bug report #893713,
regarding debootstrap-udeb: containts too many scripts files (most of them are
symlink but...)
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 11 Aug 2018 04:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#903481: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.107
has caused the Debian Bug report #903481,
regarding debootstrap: Save apt compatible lists
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 11 Aug 2018 04:48:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#829725: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.107
has caused the Debian Bug report #829725,
regarding debootstrap: cannot bootstrap from repositories without InRelease
files when --debian-installer set
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 11 Aug 2018 04:48:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618839: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.107
has caused the Debian Bug report #618839,
regarding debootstrap-udeb: restore stable/testing/unstable scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 11 Aug 2018 04:48:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#903657: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.107
has caused the Debian Bug report #903657,
regarding docker detection breaks QEMU's binfmt_misc bootstraping
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.106
Tags: patch
Since debootstrap 1.0.102, merged-/usr installs are the default, except when
installing blacklisted suites. The blacklist was established in
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/commit/4a1b3ca, whose
commit message says:
Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400
schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen):
> [...]
> Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system,
^
Interesting. How did you get that figure?
Regards,
Herbert
On 08/10/2018 10:08 AM, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:14:15 -0400
> schrieb lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen):
>
>> [...]
>> Well 99.9% of installs don't have another linux on the system,
>^
> Interesting. How did you get that figure?
It's most
Package: installation-report
Summary: Customer did what hardware vendor should have done
Hi,
The original plan was to order a XPS 15 pre-install with Linux.
Website of Dell has / had it too well hidden,
so we ordered a XPS 15 9570 with MS Windows 10 and installed Linux.
Installed with
29 matches
Mail list logo
