On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 18:05, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:03:53PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
This is what somebody suggested on IRC. I have configured localhost to
be 127.0.0.1, and hostname and fqdn to 127.0.1.1. Which hasn't shown
any bad effects
Luk Claes wrote:
Unfortunately I won't be available the next couple of days and Phil
was rather busy up to now (and I expect that to continue for some time
still), so the point release will be delayed for at least a week.
Hopefully we will be able to do the point release next Saturday, I
hope
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 21:37 +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
Hi.
We have a major upstream release of brltty waiting in sid to propagate
to testing. After a few bugs found, I think it is time to let this
happen. The automatic transition is blocked due to an udeb though.
Please let brltty
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:45 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
please hint module-init-tools
-boot?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 19:19 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Otavio Salvador wrote:
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes:
Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
Ack
Already unblocked since May 26th ...
Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:45 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
please hint module-init-tools
-boot?
Unblocked after confirmation from Otavio on IRC.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 11:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 21:37 +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
Hi.
We have a major upstream release of brltty waiting in sid to propagate
to testing. After a few bugs found, I think it is time to let this
happen. The automatic
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
[2009.07.13.1938 +0200]:
Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is that the
changelog has made the BTS believe that mdadm 2.6.9-3 is
a descendent of 3.0~devel3-1, and thus affected by #526806
On Sat, July 25, 2009 08:43, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
please allow debian-edu-install 0.677 into testing, which is blocked from
migrating due to it's udebs. i do not believe the udebs are used in a
default install, and thus shouldn't impact debian-installer.
Unblocked after ack from otavio.
On Sat, July 25, 2009 13:16, Davide Viti wrote:
Hi,
ttf-dejavu 2.29-3 is now in good shape,
please allow it into testing
Unblocked after ack from otavio.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, July 23, 2009 10:25, Mark Brown wrote:
Could you pleas unblock zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14? It's been in unstable
for getting on for a month without incident, the changelog is:
zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14) unstable; urgency=low
* amd64 has finally abandoned /emul/ia32-linux so install the
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
usbutils 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb.
It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems!
Could you please hint it?
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
cpuburn 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb.
It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems!
Could you please hint it?
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, July 30, 2009 15:04, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please unblock libpng 1.2.38-1 (udeb)
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1]
Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing?
Unblocked, after ack from Otavio.
You'll need to get ftp-master to remove the old libgio-fam binaries on
the Linux
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 17:19 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please unblock rdate 1:1.2-3 (udeb)
Unblocked after ack from Otavio.
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All
three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed).
Unblocking them's not a problem, although I'd prefer an ack (or at least
a moo) from the maintainers.
Cheers,
Adam
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 06:24 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.3-2 (udeb)
Unblocked (and just waiting for the powerpc build to be uploaded).
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 12:37 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
gtk2-engines 1:2.18.2-1 has been ready to migrate for quite a while, so
could you please unblock it?
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All
three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed).
Unblocking them's not a problem, although I'd prefer
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:28 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
ltsp 5.1.81-2 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the
ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by
default, and has no changes since the previous version.
it has been in unstable for 9
Hi,
The next Lenny point release (5.0.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 5th.
With the exception of already planned kernel and installer updates,
stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of August 29th - 30th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:34 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
please unblock reiser4progs 1.0.7-4. This fixes an upcoming release
goal.
(Yes probable it would be better to include more changes, but I doubt
that upstream makes another release and there are no open bug reports.)
Unblocked, however...
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 12:03 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please unblock libpng 1.2.39-1
[...]
please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.4-1
Both unblocked.
please unblock rdate 1:1.2-4
Changes:
rdate (1:1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Connect to an NTP server over IPv6
Patch
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The next Lenny point release (5.0.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 5th.
The point release has now been moved slightly forward - we'll be aiming to
start around 19:00 UTC this evening so the updated packages should start
appearing on mirrors overnight (UTC
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 09:33 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Unless there are objections I will also backport the changes for Etch as
that version has the same issues and I think it's worth having the
better support for installs from archive.d.o after
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 14:03 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
please unblock debian-edu-install, it contains two udebs not used by the
debian-installer by default.
Otavio confirmed on IRC that he's happy to let britney handle migrating
debian-edu-install. I've made that change, so d-e-i should
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 21:26 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
I've just uploaded an update of clock-setup (0.97lenny1) with a workaround
for a bug in rdate (see changelog for bug numbers).
[...]
Please accept the new version.
Accepted.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 16:25 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 13 December 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Accepted for both stable and oldstable (already built everywhere for
Thanks.
stable, oldstable is waiting for ftpmaster to process p-u-new again).
Any chance of that happening soon
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 00:20 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
There are only a few udebs left that still depend on libc6 rather than
libc6-udeb. In most cases the reason is simply that they have not been
uploaded since glibc got support for creating the correct dependencies.
A binNMU should solve
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 18:57 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
As all packages needed to build D-I were now available, I have uploaded
for both stable and oldstable. An accept is not needed; apparently D-I
gets an automatic accept due to by-hand
Hi,
The next Lenny point release (5.0.4) is scheduled for the evening of
Friday, January 29th.
Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of January 23rd - 24th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:37 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Unblocked. For the record, Otavio acked the unblock, but only on IRC...
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:57 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
In order to ensure that packages marked as key for a task remain present
and installable in testing, britney uses a generated faux package which
depends on each of the packages.
[...]
We've therefore been looking
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 03:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Finally, there is a pending security update for squeeze
(2.6.32-35squeeze1). I would like to see this released first so that
the s-p-u upload (2.6.32-36) can include its fixes.
Is there an (E)ETA for the security release?
Regards,
Adam
Package: os-prober-udeb
Version: 1.48
Severity: serious
Hi,
The addition of the grub-mount-udeb dependency to os-prober-udeb in the
latest upload renders the latter uninstallable on architectures where
the former doesn't exist, namely armel, ia64, mips and s390.
Regards,
Adam
--
To
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The addition of the grub-mount-udeb dependency to os-prober-udeb in
the latest upload renders the latter uninstallable on architectures
where the former doesn't exist
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 10:27 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't have a bug number for this, but a friend of mine (CCed) is
running into this as a problem for Debian users at his colo facility:
they're using Xen and their PV-GRUB is set up to read from
/boot/grub/menu.lst, so they need to
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:10:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 10:27 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[allowing use GRUB legacy to be pre-seeded]
The following patch restores this. I've just uploaded a matching patch
-boot: ping?
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:04 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote:
* Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool).
(Closes: #637100)
* Move libipx.so.2
tag 637111 + confirmed
thanks
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:04, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote:
* Move libsbuf.so.0
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 21:08 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/9/28 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
In that case, please go ahead. (Preferably sooner rather than later, as
both libraries appear to be in the d-i initrd).
Uploaded.
On Wednesday, in fact, and accepted the same day
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net:
To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug
fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020):
Bug # -- package -- title
635384 -- parted --
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 22:59 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 23:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
that the partman-* changes won't be included
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 14:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs
Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer.
If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads
[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable]
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
- Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs?
It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related
query, has
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/
rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not
empty
[...]
$ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 23:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Time passed, and a version of tasksel which implements the real
package approach will migrate to testing in the next day or so.
[...]
From the britney point-of-view, I'm looking at dropping most of the
current
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.4) is scheduled for Saturday
January 28th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceeding weekend
(21st/22nd).
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the
[CC += -boot]
On 16.01.2012 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 04:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the
point
release, it would be ideal if that could
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 18:48 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi Dann,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:29:04PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[...]
3) Finally, we need to do a d-i rebuild (which we usually do with
each point release anyway). You can coordinate with me on that.
Thanks for the heads
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 17:43 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
To try to work out of box for most situations we use
/etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to
grab udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders.
[...]
- If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (to
On 13.02.2012 11:02, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+BUILDD_TARGET=$(shell [[ -e /etc/buildd_target ]] sed
's,sid,unstable,g' /etc/buildd_target || echo ) +ifeq
(${BUILDD_TARGET},)
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(shell grep -q '/sid$' /etc/debian_version echo
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point
release would be due in early February.
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for
lenny will end on February 6th (a year after
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
-kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
upload for lenny? If so we need to get those sorted asap.
*prod*?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
[Cc list trimmed]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:03 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
-kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
upload for lenny
On 14.02.2012 21:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As the security team have recently confirmed that security support
for
lenny will end on February 6th (a year after the release of squeeze)
it
makes sense to schedule 5.0.10 to be after
Hi,
The next - and final - point release for lenny (5.0.10) is scheduled
for Saturday March 10th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the coming
weekend (3rd/4th).
As this will be the last point release for lenny, it will be moved to
archive.debian.org in the near future (most likely on or
On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote:
Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to
do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first
weekend in march - that's one week out, and I'll have spotty
availability beginning mid-week. For later weekends, I'm for
On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
chucked at the buildds.
[...]
Ack.
Unfortunately, the powerpc build died:
CC [M] arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.o
Hi,
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 14:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer:
Thanks for this.
* until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
* until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded
* on 03/17 try to get the
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please age the following packages:
[list re-ordered for ease]
arcboot-installer
cdrom-detect
cdrom-retriever
colo-installer
elilo-installer
finish-install
fonts-samyak
fonts-smc
grub-installer
installation-report
iso-scan
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 15:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
pkgse
Did you mean pkgsel?
yes, sorry.
Okay; done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 2014-09-10 11:17, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Is the PTS playing tricks again?
https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub2.html
No, it's not dealing with Extra-Source-Only sources correctly.
oldstable
1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1
stable
1.99-27+deb7u2
testing
2.02~beta2-11
unstable
Hi,
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 12:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19
Hi,
The next point release for wheezy (7.7) is scheduled for Saturday,
October 18th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
In theory the 7.8 point release should be in December, but that's often
a pain to organise. So let's look at January instead:
3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
10th / 11th - Fine for me
17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from early
afternoon
Hi,
The next Lenny point release (5.0.8) is scheduled for Saturday, January 22nd.
Stable NEW will be frozen during Monday 17th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:10 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
reopen 603554
reassign 603554 debian-installer
thanks
On jeu., 2010-12-09 at 16:36 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:29:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mer., 2010-12-08 at 19:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
tag 610885 + squeeze-ignore
usertag 610885 + squeeze-can-defer
thanks
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 18:49 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Default install fails on kfreebsd-amd64 with the following error:
The attempt to mount a file system with type swap in
severity 611045 wishlist
retitle 611045 debian-installer: find a better way of detecting default GRUB
bootloader install location
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 03:23 +0100, Tobias Bußmann wrote:
serverity 611045 wishlist
retitle 611045 debian-installer: find a better way of detecting
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:54 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 01/21/2011 02:32 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Assuming your back from [VAC], is there any news from this?
like i said[0].. i'm on the last steps of testing and upload RSN.
That was a few days ago; how's the testing going?
Regards,
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular
uploads at this point.
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:23 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
grub-installer
There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb;
for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate
Hi,
In order to ensure that packages marked as key for a task remain present
and installable in testing, britney uses a generated faux package which
depends on each of the packages. This approach has, with the odd minor
niggle, worked fine for some time but breaks down as soon as the set of
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:57 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[the gnome task depends on gdm3, the xfce and lxde tasks depend on gdm;
gdm and gdm3 conflict]
That's unfortunate. I doubt that the light desktop tasks will continue
to use gdm for too long, as it seems unlikely gdm 2
Package: apt-setup
Version: 1:0.53
Severity: important
Hi,
Thanks very much for including my rather last minute apt-setup patch to
add $codename-updates to sources.list when volatile is selected for =
squeeze installs.
Unfortunately, the behaviour is somewhat suboptimal when an install is
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 15:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I would like to fix a bug in finish-install, which doesn't enable the
serial console on MIPS Swarm machines during installation, as the serial
devices are called duart0 or duart1 instead of tty*. This bug is quite
important to fix as
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 16:42 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
We would like to push the following changes to 6.0.1 to fix a problem
with not waiting long enough for SCSI subsystem to be initialized, and
disk detection failing in d-i on the first try as a result. These have
been committed to the
tag 613910 + patch
thanks
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 08:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks very much for including my rather last minute apt-setup patch to
add $codename-updates to sources.list when volatile is selected for =
squeeze installs.
Unfortunately, the behaviour is somewhat
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
For the record, after a discussion on #-boot earlier this evening, we
concluded that
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild
the installer with
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in
unstable but
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 11:39 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
grub-installer
Doesn't look
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com):
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.44
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
That should be fixed once busybox providing sha256sum reaches testing.
Hi,
The first Squeeze point release (6.0.1) is scheduled for Saturday, March
19th.
Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of the 12/13th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, March 9, 2011 15:12, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2011-03-06 16:20:51 +0100:
- console-setup
Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1.
Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it?
I prepared a
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 21:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
please unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent the following packages:
netcfg/1.101
rootskel/1.101
yaboot-installer/1.1.25
grub-installer/1.83
All done.
netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be
adding
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 22:35 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (13/11/2012):
netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be
adding versatile support and a bunch of .gitignore noise; I'm assuming
that also wants pulling in?
Yes
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 19:55 +0800, Michael Tsang wrote:
The script of os-prober states that it does not work on non-Linux kernels. It
makes the whole thing on the non-Linux ports useless. Please fix that.
Where does it say that?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:00 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
time for another round of unblocks/unblock-udebs! Here's a first list,
basically things I thought I could review way past bedtime. Some more
packages need review, at least according to the testing summary page:
On 20.12.2012 11:36, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Prathibha B prathib...@cdac.in (13/12/2012):
Package: choose-mirror
Version: 2.37
When compiling the package, it throws the following error:
Modification of non-creatable array value attempted, subscript -1 at
./mirrorlist line 52, IN line 8.
[...]
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 22:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:26:06AM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
partman-nbd/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb
partman-nbd/s390x unsatisfiable Depends:
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 10:31 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (20/12/2012):
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 22:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Fix uploaded. It also contains a tightening of the build-dependencies to
what's effectively already
On 22.12.2012 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
assuming +squeezeN is still customary for squeeze, here's a source
debdiff. That is really:
Makefile |2 +-
debian/changelog | 10 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
but the list is updated during the source
On 22.12.2012 13:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
unblock apt-setup/1:0.77
unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.77
unblock espeakup/1:0.71-12
unblock-udeb espeakup/1:0.71-12
[...]
unblock cdebconf/0.180
unblock-udeb cdebconf/0.180
[...]
unblock live-installer/38
unblock-udeb live-installer/38
[...]
1 - 100 of 520 matches
Mail list logo