Bug#247734: /etc/hosts: Two lines with the same IP address?

2004-06-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 18:05, Joshua Kwan wrote: On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:03:53PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: Marc Haber wrote: This is what somebody suggested on IRC. I have configured localhost to be 127.0.0.1, and hostname and fqdn to 127.0.1.1. Which hasn't shown any bad effects

Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release

2009-06-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Luk Claes wrote: Unfortunately I won't be available the next couple of days and Phil was rather busy up to now (and I expect that to continue for some time still), so the point release will be delayed for at least a week. Hopefully we will be able to do the point release next Saturday, I hope

Re: Please unfreeze brltty

2009-07-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 21:37 +0200, Mario Lang wrote: Hi. We have a major upstream release of brltty waiting in sid to propagate to testing. After a few bugs found, I think it is time to let this happen. The automatic transition is blocked due to an udeb though. Please let brltty

Re: please hint module-init-tools

2009-07-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:45 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: please hint module-init-tools -boot? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 19:19 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Otavio Salvador wrote: martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes: Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable. Ack Already unblocked since May 26th ... Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is

Re: please hint module-init-tools

2009-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:45 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: please hint module-init-tools -boot? Unblocked after confirmation from Otavio on IRC. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: Please unfreeze brltty

2009-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 11:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 21:37 +0200, Mario Lang wrote: Hi. We have a major upstream release of brltty waiting in sid to propagate to testing. After a few bugs found, I think it is time to let this happen. The automatic

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

2009-07-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.07.13.1938 +0200]: Looking more closely, the reason it's not migrating is that the changelog has made the BTS believe that mdadm 2.6.9-3 is a descendent of 3.0~devel3-1, and thus affected by #526806

Re: please allow debian-edu-install 0.677 into testing

2009-07-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, July 25, 2009 08:43, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: please allow debian-edu-install 0.677 into testing, which is blocked from migrating due to it's udebs. i do not believe the udebs are used in a default install, and thus shouldn't impact debian-installer. Unblocked after ack from otavio.

Re: Please unblock ttf-dejavu

2009-07-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, July 25, 2009 13:16, Davide Viti wrote: Hi, ttf-dejavu 2.29-3 is now in good shape, please allow it into testing Unblocked after ack from otavio. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14

2009-07-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, July 23, 2009 10:25, Mark Brown wrote: Could you pleas unblock zlib 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14? It's been in unstable for getting on for a month without incident, the changelog is: zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-14) unstable; urgency=low * amd64 has finally abandoned /emul/ia32-linux so install the

Re: please allow usbutils 0.82-1 into testing

2009-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi, usbutils 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb. It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems! Could you please hint it? Unblocked. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: please allow cpuburn 0.82-1 into testing

2009-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, July 28, 2009 19:28, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi, cpuburn 0.82-1 is blocked from migration into testing to an udeb. It has been in unstable for more than 70 days without problems! Could you please hint it? Unblocked. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: please unblock libpng 1.2.38-1 (udeb)

2009-07-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, July 30, 2009 15:04, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please unblock libpng 1.2.38-1 (udeb) Unblocked. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Unblock glib2.0

2009-08-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1] Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing? Unblocked, after ack from Otavio. You'll need to get ftp-master to remove the old libgio-fam binaries on the Linux

Re: please unblock rdate 1:1.2-3 (udeb)

2009-08-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 17:19 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please unblock rdate 1:1.2-3 (udeb) Unblocked after ack from Otavio. Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: unblock freetype, cairo, pango1.0?

2009-08-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed). Unblocking them's not a problem, although I'd prefer an ack (or at least a moo) from the maintainers. Cheers, Adam

Re: please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.3-2 (udeb)

2009-08-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 06:24 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.3-2 (udeb) Unblocked (and just waiting for the powerpc build to be uploaded). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: Please unblock gtk2-engines

2009-08-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 12:37 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: gtk2-engines 1:2.18.2-1 has been ready to migrate for quite a while, so could you please unblock it? Unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: unblock freetype, cairo, pango1.0?

2009-08-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 20:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Would it be appropriate to unblock freetype, cairo and pango1.0? All three seem to be frozen due to udebs (debian-boot CCed). Unblocking them's not a problem, although I'd prefer

Re: please allow ltsp 5.1.81-2 into testing

2009-08-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:28 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: ltsp 5.1.81-2 is blocked from migrating into testing, due to the ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by debian-installer by default, and has no changes since the previous version. it has been in unstable for 9

Upcoming Lenny point release

2009-08-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The next Lenny point release (5.0.3) is scheduled for Saturday, September 5th. With the exception of already planned kernel and installer updates, stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of August 29th - 30th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: please unblock reiser4progs 1.0.7-4

2009-08-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 13:34 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: please unblock reiser4progs 1.0.7-4. This fixes an upcoming release goal. (Yes probable it would be better to include more changes, but I doubt that upstream makes another release and there are no open bug reports.) Unblocked, however...

Re: please unblock libpng 1.2.39-1 pciutils 1:3.1.4-1 rdate 1:1.2-4 (udebs)

2009-09-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 12:03 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please unblock libpng 1.2.39-1 [...] please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.4-1 Both unblocked. please unblock rdate 1:1.2-4 Changes: rdate (1:1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Connect to an NTP server over IPv6 Patch

Re: Upcoming Lenny point release

2009-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Adam D. Barratt wrote: The next Lenny point release (5.0.3) is scheduled for Saturday, September 5th. The point release has now been moved slightly forward - we'll be aiming to start around 19:00 UTC this evening so the updated packages should start appearing on mirrors overnight (UTC

Re: [OSRM] D-I: major update of choose-mirror for oldstable (etch)

2009-12-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 09:33 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Saturday 28 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote: Unless there are objections I will also backport the changes for Etch as that version has the same issues and I think it's worth having the better support for installs from archive.d.o after

Re: please unblock debian-edu-install (udeb)

2009-12-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 14:03 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: please unblock debian-edu-install, it contains two udebs not used by the debian-installer by default. Otavio confirmed on IRC that he's happy to let britney handle migrating debian-edu-install. I've made that change, so d-e-i should

Re: [SRM] Update of clock-setup for D-I

2009-12-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 21:26 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: I've just uploaded an update of clock-setup (0.97lenny1) with a workaround for a bug in rdate (see changelog for bug numbers). [...] Please accept the new version. Accepted. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: [OSRM] D-I: major update of choose-mirror for oldstable (etch)

2009-12-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 16:25 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 13 December 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Accepted for both stable and oldstable (already built everywhere for Thanks. stable, oldstable is waiting for ftpmaster to process p-u-new again). Any chance of that happening soon

Re: binNMU request to correct libc dependencies for udebs

2009-12-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 00:20 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: There are only a few udebs left that still depend on libc6 rather than libc6-udeb. In most cases the reason is simply that they have not been uploaded since glibc got support for creating the correct dependencies. A binNMU should solve

Re: [(O)SRM] debian-installer update uploaded for Etch and Lenny

2010-01-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 18:57 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Thursday 24 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote: As all packages needed to build D-I were now available, I have uploaded for both stable and oldstable. An accept is not needed; apparently D-I gets an automatic accept due to by-hand

Upcoming lenny point release

2010-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The next Lenny point release (5.0.4) is scheduled for the evening of Friday, January 29th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of January 23rd - 24th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: please unblock udev

2011-06-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:37 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: Unblocked. For the record, Otavio acked the unblock, but only on IRC... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Task installability and britney

2011-08-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:57 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote: In order to ensure that packages marked as key for a task remain present and installable in testing, britney uses a generated faux package which depends on each of the packages. [...] We've therefore been looking

Re: Updating linux-2.6 for point release 6.0.3

2011-08-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 03:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Finally, there is a pending security update for squeeze (2.6.32-35squeeze1). I would like to see this released first so that the s-p-u upload (2.6.32-36) can include its fixes. Is there an (E)ETA for the security release? Regards, Adam

Bug#639599: os-prober-udeb: uninstallable on armel, ia64, mips and s390 (grub-mount-udeb)

2011-08-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Package: os-prober-udeb Version: 1.48 Severity: serious Hi, The addition of the grub-mount-udeb dependency to os-prober-udeb in the latest upload renders the latter uninstallable on architectures where the former doesn't exist, namely armel, ia64, mips and s390. Regards, Adam -- To

Bug#639599: os-prober-udeb: uninstallable on armel, ia64, mips and s390 (grub-mount-udeb)

2011-08-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The addition of the grub-mount-udeb dependency to os-prober-udeb in the latest upload renders the latter uninstallable on architectures where the former doesn't exist

Re: [SRM] proposed stable update grub-installer

2011-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 10:27 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: I don't have a bug number for this, but a friend of mine (CCed) is running into this as a problem for Debian users at his colo facility: they're using Xen and their PV-GRUB is set up to read from /boot/grub/menu.lst, so they need to

Re: [SRM] proposed stable update grub-installer

2011-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 22:05 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:10:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 10:27 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: [allowing use GRUB legacy to be pre-seeded] The following patch restores this. I've just uploaded a matching patch

Re: Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6

2011-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
-boot: ping? On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 13:04 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote: * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool). (Closes: #637100) * Move libipx.so.2

Re: Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6

2011-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 637111 + confirmed thanks On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:04, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote: * Move libsbuf.so.0

Re: Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 21:08 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/28 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: In that case, please go ahead. (Preferably sooner rather than later, as both libraries appear to be in the d-i initrd). Uploaded. On Wednesday, in fact, and accepted the same day

Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted --

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 22:59 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze

Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 23:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included

Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 14:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads

kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related query, has

Re: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty [...] $ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486

Re: Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 23:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to

Re: Task installability and britney

2011-11-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote: Time passed, and a version of tasksel which implements the real package approach will migrate to testing in the next day or so. [...] From the britney point-of-view, I'm looking at dropping most of the current

Upcoming stable point release

2012-01-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The next point release for squeeze (6.0.4) is scheduled for Saturday January 28th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceeding weekend (21st/22nd). As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze. If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the

Re: Upcoming stable point release

2012-01-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[CC += -boot] On 16.01.2012 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 04:09 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 13:12 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: If there is a further kernel update planned for inclusion in the point release, it would be ideal if that could

Re: Bug#630424: Maybe a Problem with tip22

2012-01-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 18:48 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: Hi Dann, On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:29:04PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: [...] 3) Finally, we need to do a d-i rebuild (which we usually do with each point release anyway). You can coordinate with me on that. Thanks for the heads

Re: Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching

2012-02-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 17:43 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: To try to work out of box for most situations we use /etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to grab udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders. [...] - If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (to

Re: Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching

2012-02-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.02.2012 11:02, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: +BUILDD_TARGET=$(shell [[ -e /etc/buildd_target ]] sed 's,sid,unstable,g' /etc/buildd_target || echo ) +ifeq (${BUILDD_TARGET},) +USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(shell grep -q '/sid$' /etc/debian_version echo

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-02-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Working on the four-monthly schedule for oldstable, the next lenny point release would be due in early February. As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for lenny will end on February 6th (a year after

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-02-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: -kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i upload for lenny? If so we need to get those sorted asap. *prod*? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Cc list trimmed] On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:03 -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: -kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i upload for lenny

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-02-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 14.02.2012 21:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: As the security team have recently confirmed that security support for lenny will end on February 6th (a year after the release of squeeze) it makes sense to schedule 5.0.10 to be after

Upcoming oldstable point release

2012-02-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The next - and final - point release for lenny (5.0.10) is scheduled for Saturday March 10th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the coming weekend (3rd/4th). As this will be the last point release for lenny, it will be moved to archive.debian.org in the near future (most likely on or

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-02-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 27.02.2012 01:12, dann frazier wrote: Ok - sounds like no DSA, but maybe an upload via o-p-u. My vote is to do no kernel upload if the release gets scheduled for the first weekend in march - that's one week out, and I'll have spotty availability beginning mid-week. For later weekends, I'm for

Re: Planning for final lenny point release (5.0.10)

2012-03-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it chucked at the buildds. [...] Ack. Unfortunately, the powerpc build died: CC [M] arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_power4.o

Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done

2012-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 14:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer: Thanks for this. * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded * on 03/17 try to get the

Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done

2012-03-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Please age the following packages: [list re-ordered for ease] arcboot-installer cdrom-detect cdrom-retriever colo-installer elilo-installer finish-install fonts-samyak fonts-smc grub-installer installation-report iso-scan

Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done

2012-03-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 15:42 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: pkgse Did you mean pkgsel? yes, sorry. Okay; done. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: GRUB version in testing

2014-09-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2014-09-10 11:17, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Is the PTS playing tricks again? https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub2.html No, it's not dealing with Extra-Source-Only sources correctly. oldstable 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1 stable 1.99-27+deb7u2 testing 2.02~beta2-11 unstable

7.7 planning

2014-09-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose we go for one of: 11/12 October 18/19 October 25/26 October Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: 7.7 planning

2014-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 12:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose we go for one of: 11/12 October 18/19

Upcoming stable point release (7.7)

2014-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The next point release for wheezy (7.7) is scheduled for Saturday, October 18th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

7.8 dates

2014-12-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, In theory the 7.8 point release should be in December, but that's often a pain to organise. So let's look at January instead: 3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday 10th / 11th - Fine for me 17th / 18th - jmw's BSP 24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from early afternoon

Upcoming Lenny point release

2011-01-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The next Lenny point release (5.0.8) is scheduled for Saturday, January 22nd. Stable NEW will be frozen during Monday 17th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#603554: Bug#603552: Update theme SpaceFun and wiki page

2011-01-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:10 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: reopen 603554 reassign 603554 debian-installer thanks On jeu., 2010-12-09 at 16:36 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:29:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On mer., 2010-12-08 at 19:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann

Bug#610885: default install fails on kfreebsd-amd64

2011-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
user release.debian@packages.debian.org tag 610885 + squeeze-ignore usertag 610885 + squeeze-can-defer thanks On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 18:49 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: Default install fails on kfreebsd-amd64 with the following error: The attempt to mount a file system with type swap in

Bug#611045: debian-installer: GRUB always installs in /dev/sda

2011-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 611045 wishlist retitle 611045 debian-installer: find a better way of detecting default GRUB bootloader install location thanks Hi, On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 03:23 +0100, Tobias Bußmann wrote: serverity 611045 wishlist retitle 611045 debian-installer: find a better way of detecting

Bug#603554: Bug#603552: Bug#603554: Bug#603552: Update theme SpaceFun and wiki page

2011-01-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:54 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 01/21/2011 02:32 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Assuming your back from [VAC], is there any news from this? like i said[0].. i'm on the last steps of testing and upload RSN. That was a few days ago; how's the testing going? Regards,

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-02-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular uploads at this point.

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-02-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:23 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: grub-installer There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb; for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate

Task installability and britney

2011-02-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, In order to ensure that packages marked as key for a task remain present and installable in testing, britney uses a generated faux package which depends on each of the packages. This approach has, with the odd minor niggle, worked fine for some time but breaks down as soon as the set of

Re: Task installability and britney

2011-02-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 12:57 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote: [the gnome task depends on gdm3, the xfce and lxde tasks depend on gdm; gdm and gdm3 conflict] That's unfortunate. I doubt that the light desktop tasks will continue to use gdm for too long, as it seems unlikely gdm 2

Bug#613910: apt-setup: Improve squeeze-updates behaviour during installations with no network mirror

2011-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Package: apt-setup Version: 1:0.53 Severity: important Hi, Thanks very much for including my rather last minute apt-setup patch to add $codename-updates to sources.list when volatile is selected for = squeeze installs. Unfortunately, the behaviour is somewhat suboptimal when an install is

Re: [SRM] Approval for finish-install_2.28squeeze1

2011-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 15:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: I would like to fix a bug in finish-install, which doesn't enable the serial console on MIPS Swarm machines during installation, as the serial devices are called duart0 or duart1 instead of tty*. This bug is quite important to fix as

Re: [SRM] Seeking approval for hw-detect changes for 6.0.1

2011-02-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 16:42 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: We would like to push the following changes to 6.0.1 to fix a problem with not waiting long enough for SCSI subsystem to be initialized, and disk detection failing in d-i on the first try as a result. These have been committed to the

Bug#613910: Bug #613910: apt-setup: Improve squeeze-updates behaviour during installations with no network mirror

2011-02-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 613910 + patch thanks On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 08:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks very much for including my rather last minute apt-setup patch to add $codename-updates to sources.list when volatile is selected for = squeeze installs. Unfortunately, the behaviour is somewhat

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-02-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: For the record, after a discussion on #-boot earlier this evening, we concluded that

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1

2011-03-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 18:19 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-03-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer Doesn't look like this got uploaded yet? The relevant fix is in unstable but

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-03-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 11:39 -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - anything I missed? netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my supplied patch for NM's

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-03-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:46 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer Doesn't look

Bug#617204: installation-report: /usr/sbin/debootstrap reports sha1sum: not found

2011-03-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:17 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Rick Thomas (rbtho...@pobox.com): Package: installation-reports Version: 2.44 Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable That should be fixed once busybox providing sha256sum reaches testing.

Upcoming squeeze point release

2011-03-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, The first Squeeze point release (6.0.1) is scheduled for Saturday, March 19th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of the 12/13th. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1

2011-03-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, March 9, 2011 15:12, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2011-03-06 16:20:51 +0100: - console-setup Looks okay, other than the version number should be 1.68+squeeze1. Fixed in unstable but not migrated to testing yet; could we unblock it? I prepared a

Re: Unblocks for d-i beta4

2012-11-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 21:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: please unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent the following packages: netcfg/1.101 rootskel/1.101 yaboot-installer/1.1.25 grub-installer/1.83 All done. netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be adding

Re: Unblocks for d-i beta4

2012-11-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 22:35 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (13/11/2012): netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be adding versatile support and a bunch of .gitignore noise; I'm assuming that also wants pulling in? Yes

Bug#695505: os-prober: does not work on non-Linux kernels

2012-12-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 19:55 +0800, Michael Tsang wrote: The script of os-prober states that it does not work on non-Linux kernels. It makes the whole thing on the non-Linux ports useless. Please fix that. Where does it say that? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: unblock(-udeb)s for d-i wheezy rc1, round 1

2012-12-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:00 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: time for another round of unblocks/unblock-udebs! Here's a first list, basically things I thought I could review way past bedtime. Some more packages need review, at least according to the testing summary page:

Bug#695851: [SRM] Re: Bug#695851: choose-mirror compilation error

2012-12-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 20.12.2012 11:36, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Prathibha B prathib...@cdac.in (13/12/2012): Package: choose-mirror Version: 2.37 When compiling the package, it throws the following error: Modification of non-creatable array value attempted, subscript -1 at ./mirrorlist line 52, IN line 8. [...]

Re: unblock(-udeb)s for d-i wheezy rc1, round 1

2012-12-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 22:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:26:06AM +, Adam Barratt wrote: partman-nbd/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb partman-nbd/s390x unsatisfiable Depends:

Re: unblock(-udeb)s for d-i wheezy rc1, round 1

2012-12-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 10:31 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (20/12/2012): On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 22:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Fix uploaded. It also contains a tightening of the build-dependencies to what's effectively already

Bug#695851: [SRM] Re: Bug#695851: choose-mirror compilation error

2012-12-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 22.12.2012 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote: assuming +squeezeN is still customary for squeeze, here's a source debdiff. That is really: Makefile |2 +- debian/changelog | 10 ++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) but the list is updated during the source

Re: unblock(-udeb)s for d-i wheezy rc1, round 2

2012-12-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 22.12.2012 13:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote: unblock apt-setup/1:0.77 unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.77 unblock espeakup/1:0.71-12 unblock-udeb espeakup/1:0.71-12 [...] unblock cdebconf/0.180 unblock-udeb cdebconf/0.180 [...] unblock live-installer/38 unblock-udeb live-installer/38 [...]

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >