On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>sledge:/mirror/sarge-cd/jigdo$ zgrep netcfg *jigdo
>sarge-i386-1.jigdo:GfQ50NysZ7YJVUyG9VK-Uw=Debian:pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.63_i386.udeb
>
>netcfg seems to be there.
>
>And also "discover"
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:12:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hmmm. That wasn't very successful. Netcfg loaded fine off the CD, but
>> only after I loaded it by hand. The 3c59x driver for the network card
>> in the test machine just didn't ge
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:16:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:12:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> Hmmm. That wasn't very successful. Netcfg loaded fine off the CD, but
>>> only after I loaded it by hand. The 3
naming files by hand on DOS machines any more...?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code
is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:11:39PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hmmm. That wasn't very successful. Netcfg loaded fine off the CD, but
>> only after I loaded it by hand. The 3c59x driver for the network card
>> in the test machine just didn't ge
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 08:17:23AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>Quoting Steve McIntyre:
>> Guys,
>>
>> We're still putting TRANS.TBL files in every directory on the
>> CDs. Surely by now we can just lose them? They're going to be wasting
>> space
27;s build with
>yesterday's and I have checked them and there is no TRANS.TBL files on them.
OK. What size difference is there? It won't be huge (a few bytes per
directory), but I'd expect it to be noticeable, especially on the
businesscard image where we&#
in, this could be
>due to package changes in the cds, so this is not significative at all.
OK. Quick check here on an image full of small files:
-rw-rw-r--1 stevepcs 87336960 Jun 11 09:41 with.iso
-rw-rw-r--1 stevepcs 86667264 Jun 11 09:45 without.iso
It's worth
d?
>
>Is forcd1 for sarge? for any release?
>
>Shouldn't it be different for each release? maybe a name like forcd1-sarge
>and some purging, additions, reordering, ... here should be in place?
Definitely, IMHO.
>Third one:
>
>We are
severity 238228 normal
tags 238228 +wontfix +unreproducible
thanks
Matt,
I can't find anything wrong with this package - it builds just fine
and the debian/ dir is not setgid in the .tar.gz. Can you check this
again?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>Matt,
>
>I can't find anything wrong with this package - it builds just fine
>and the debian/ dir is not setgid in the .tar.gz. Can you check this
>again?
Gah, f*cked up looking at the package - it _does_ ha
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:17:09PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >
>> >Matt,
>> >
>> >I can't find anything wrong w
US, or zh_TW regardless of where a machine ends up being
sold... :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
>extra 12-hour delay. If you're only available in the afternoon or in the
>evening, we might get netcfg fixed for free, which I'm also OK with. :)
>
>Bottom line: Whatever works for you!
FTAOD: I started building CDs this morning, they'll be ready soon-ish.
--
Steve McIn
which we finally didn't do for
>wheezy. Unless someone has an objection, I'll schedule this switch for
>the next d-i upload.
Yay, definitely. We never did get round to this for Wheezy, so let's
get it done now.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.s
iny* minority of users) there is no down-side.
>Especially now that we go to systemd as the default init system, I
>think it is wise to respect the systemd ACL settings. So we don't get
>unexpected behaviors.
There are still likely going to be vastly more non-systemd user
ment is XFCE. If you want
Gnome, grab debian-testing-amd64-gnome-CD-1.iso instead.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm
afraid I'll miss my stop"
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:38:44PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>So far as I know, no progress has been made on the above steps or any
>alternate approach.
Ditto, I've not seen (or done) anything about this.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st
gt;
>It would certainly be worth fixing this reversion in the multiarch CD.
Definitely - we're already tracking this in #752133
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I suspect most samba developers are already technically insane... Of
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:17:02AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>[ Adding -accessibility@ and -cd@ to the loop. ]
>
>Steve McIntyre (2014-08-17):
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> >Control: tag -1 confirmed
>> >> Another
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:58:27PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2014-08-19):
>> or do we split things even more? That menu is already too long, and
>> causes scrolling for people to see the lower options (if they realise
>> such a thing is possible!). How
Package: partman-efi
Version: 42
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
arm64 is a UEFI architecture, and there are some ARMv7 (i.e.) armhf
UEFI platforms too. Please add arm64 and armhf to the arch list.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
APT prefers stable
APT pol
Package: efi-reader
Version: 0.11
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
arm64 is a UEFI architecture, and there are some ARMv7 (i.e.) armhf
UEFI platforms too. Please add arm64 and armhf to the arch list.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
APT prefers stable
APT po
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:28:14PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 19:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Steve McIntyre (2014-08-20):
>> > arm64 is a UEFI architecture, and there are some ARMv7 (i.e.) armhf
>> > UEFI platforms too. Please add arm64
as deleted in
mrconfig. Looks like a mistake to me - can anybody explain? Joey?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian
text to add on
>>the back ?
>
>I don’t think so. By the way, I’m not sure that providing a DVD cover
>is mandatory. I do not remember if Adrien provided one for Wheezy’s
>theme (Joy).
Not mandatory (little is!), but it would be a nice touch...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
ly fails with kernel
>panic at detecting network card.
>
>checksum of the iso file matches. please, cc: me on reply as I'm not
>subscribed.
Hi Matej,
I'm not aware of anything wrong with the image. I've just retried it
right now to confirm, and it's working well for m
gt;Ignoring non-problems looks like a good idea.
Agreed.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:33:06AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2014-09-08):
>> This is (almost) exactly what's being worked on after discussions at
>> DebConf. By removing some of the less useful tasks, we'll be able to
>> add some extra more usef
bian_installer_and_CD_BoF.webm
[2] http://www.einval.com/~steve/talks/Debconf14-installer-cd/
[3] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktop/Requalification/Jessie
[4]
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/138/tasksel-default-desktop-requalification/
[5]
http://meetings-archive.d
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:18:14AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
>[ And -cd@ so that the team knows a release is planned “soon”, in case
>some patches are in the works. ]
ACK. I still want to get some stuff done on the EFI front, but my
stack is a bajillion deep at the moment... :-(
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:45:28AM -0700, intrigeri wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Steve McIntyre wrote (09 Sep 2014 15:51:01 GMT) :
>> * Regular live builds of testing - now we have stable release builds
>> happening on pettersson, we should also be able to do regular
>> weeklies
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:23:10PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Steve McIntyre writes:
>> Debian-CD Plans
>> ===
>>
>> * Which images do we want to make for Jessie? Currently we have, for
>> every architecture:
>> + netinst
&g
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:51:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:51:01PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> * Generating complete images (as opposed to installer images) brings
>> up other issues - d-i already asks a set of useful q
ommend (and that I
>actively monitor + maintain):
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/daily-build-overview.html
Cool, thanks for the update! :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-
;m at the GSOC mentors' meeting in California
that weekend...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm
afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Dasmohapatra
-
. We've
fixed things now, so the next set on Monday should hopefully work fine
for you.
If it's urgent, I can force a manual build - just let me know.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
You lock the door
And throw away the key
The
Package: partman-efi
Version: 47
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Ad originally described in [1], but no bug was ever filed to
match. #695048 is related, I think. Time to file a bug about this to
help track work to fix it...
We have a machine with both UEFI and BIOS-mode boot available, with an
exis
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:02:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Package: partman-efi
>Version: 47
>Severity: important
>Tags: d-i
>
>Ad originally described in [1], but no bug was ever filed to
>match. #695048 is related, I think. Time to file a bug about this to
>h
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> If the user wants to continue, we could even suggest blanking the
>> partition table(s) and starting again with GPT, but I don't think
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:02:12PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:26:20AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > >On S
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> That sounds better to me too, assuming we can sensibly do a question
>> at that point. Is that allowed? I honestly don't know... :-/
>
>While
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> That sounds better to me too, assuming we can sensibly do a question
>>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>>
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140802
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
When working with UEFI and GPT systems, it would be lovely if had
gdisk to be able to modify / view partitioning setup on the command
line, similar to the fdisk tool we already have.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:24:15AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2014-10-01):
>> Package: debian-installer
>> Version: 20140802
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: d-i
>>
>> When working with UEFI and GPT systems, it would be lovely if h
Control: tag -1 +patch
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson
Hang fire - one test just failed. :-(
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Control: tag -1 +patch
>
>On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>On Sun, Se
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:25AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> From: Steve McIntyre
>> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi
>[...]
&
location of the ESP. I would
>> recommend that the default value of this prompt be Yes if no default
>> bootloader currently exists, and No if one currently exists (along
>> with the requisite warning about overwriting).
>
>Steve,
>
>what's your take on this topic?
That&#x
t all.
Then you have no clue about what that means.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
< sladen> I actually stayed in a hotel and arrived to find a post-it
note stuck to the mini-bar saying "Paul: This fridge and
fittings
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:45:11AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 01:28 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Then you have no clue about what that means.
>What exactly do yo refer to?
>
>Not providing a default DE? I rather thought about a solution li
eve suggested copying grubx64.efi to /boot/efi/EFI/boot/bootx64.efi,
>which worked. Not exactly ideal, but better than having to navigate
>through the ESP at each boot.
ACK. We're seeing this in a few other bug reports,
e.g. #708430. #744462 is a wishlist bug in d-i to ask for exa
very low on free time right now, but if someone
>fancies discussing that with him, please keep debian-boot@ in the loop?
ACK. There's some discussion ongoing in #debian-uk right now, of all
places... :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.co
Current patches attached here.
I was totally thrown in testing by #768788 - some of my tests on
installed EFI systems were failing, due to the broken GUID on the
ESP. Yay!
I've merged things forward and I'm ready to push these changes. Please
review one last time?
--
Steve McIntyre,
Control: tag -1 +pending
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 01:12:14PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Steve McIntyre (2014-11-12):
>> Current patches attached here.
>>
>> I was totally thrown in testing by #768788 - some of my tests on
>> installed EFI systems were failing, du
p this build dependency and let release people know that
>they can drop this package from the d-i not-a-real package.
Agreed, makes sense.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane
--
used in the complete case, to allow our grep
>calls to work.
>
>This is the patch we use at the moment to build the Debian Edu ISOs:
Interesting change; I'd be tempted to refactor things slightly in the
code, but that's a secondary thing. I'm more curious: what are the
ramificat
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 07:05:34AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>[Steve McIntyre]
>> Interesting change; I'd be tempted to refactor things slightly in
>> the code, but that's a secondary thing. I'm more curious: what are
>> the ramifications for d-i? Have
3,7 @@
> [ -f "$id/method" ] || continue
> method=$(cat $id/method)
> [ "$method" = efi ] || continue
>- echo "$path" /boot/efi vfat defaults 0 1
>+ echo "$path" /boo
take people through
this process: "If you have a broken UEFI implementation on your
computer, then here's how to recognise it and here's what to do to
work around it.."
Go on, what have I missed / misunderstood / got wrong?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
, that sounds very likely - it's a well-known fact that amd64
kernels are not going to run on older i386 hardware. I may be missing
something here - is there anything else you'd like to report?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"You c
l. In my understanding, when I reach the installer menu, the boot
>procedure is complete.
Correct - at that point you're in Linux with d-i running.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
The two hard things in computing:
* naming things
* cache
yet started here. Any of the menu choices
here will start the 64-bit kernel and that's why you're seeing the
hang on your 32-bit system.
Ian - am I totally mis-remembering that there used to be a "can't
start on 32-bit " style message in the amd64 kernel?
--
Steve McI
SB stick already, and it's going to show up
as ISO9660 instead of vfat/ext4/etc. It's also going to have some
useful extra data on it that we can pick up on, e.g. the .disk
directory containing flag files.
Apt guys, how much effort would it be to add an extra package source
(derived from
escription
printf "efi\t${RET}\n"
diff -Nru partman-efi-51/debian/changelog partman-efi-56/debian/changelog
--- partman-efi-51/debian/changelog 2014-10-22 08:38:10.0 +0100
+++ partman-efi-56/debian/changelog 2014-11-24 08:02:59.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,47 @@
+partman-efi (56) u
ht* be on first boot after installation, but you're
leaving me to guess at that. How did you partition, etc.? Were there
any errors reported during installation?
Please help us to help you...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"You can
>https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/ch03s06.html.en#UEFI
>problem...
Please attach the installer syslog so we have a chance to see what
happened. On the installed system, that's in /var/log/installer/syslog
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.s
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:37:52AM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>>>>>> "SM" == Steve McIntyre writes:
>SM> Please attach the installer syslog so we have a chance to see what
>SM> happened. On the installed system, that's in /var/log/installer/sy
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:29:36PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>I've let this slip off my radar since, and it's not gone away.
>
>I'm seeing this problem really obviously with live installations now,
>as I've just been testing them with Secure Boot.
>
>Hop
Actually...
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 04:36:59PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>We need to run update-dev *after* the filesystem creation scripts and
>this fixes things. I've just copiet it to 99update-dev locally while
>testing and that made all the difference. It could proba
itor" -
start it unconditionally, logging to the installer syslog. It'd be a
good extra bit of debug to have.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Google-bait: http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd
Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing
lists asking us to send them to you.
or: you need to load the kernel first.
>
>Press any key to continue
Hmmm, odd. Have you done anything special with the SB key setup on
this machine, like reset the keys database or similar?
>The usb stick seems to be created correctly as installation on my
>other machine (a
Hey folks,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:01:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Actually...
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 04:36:59PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > We need to run update-dev *after* the f
;
>No. Since it's a new installation, no valuable data has been lost.
To be honest, I can't think of a reason why we even offer a non-shadow
system. Anyone?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Arguing that you don't care abo
I’ll file a removal request later. There are also remnants of elilo
>references in debian-installer and debian-cd.
Nod, it's definitely time that elilo went away.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.
s like block
device support modules here.
Cheers,
Steve
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 07:00:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 02:17 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I;m just trying to do a buster install of arm64 (using buster d-i RC1)
>> in a qemu VM, and it's failing to find the virtio
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:07:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 22:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[...]
>> Hmmm, looking at my local mirror, I think there's another problem
>> then. I don't see scsi-modules-4.19* for arm64. Looks like we
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:39:31AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:07:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 22:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>[...]
>>> Hmmm, looking at my local mirror, I think there's another probl
-cd build, basically. Look at
https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/setup/blob/master/buster/cronjob.daily
and compare the cases for INSTALLER_CD=C (i.e. netinst with firmware)
and INSTALLER_CD=2 (normal netinst without).
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
There
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:36:22PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:24 PM Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> I'm afraid not, this is YA place where things are not documented very
>> well at all. There's an extra set of options to pass in to the
>>
for d-i, and that worries me too.
Any other suggestions on what we could do? Let me know what you
think...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
English is about as pure as a cribh
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 03:37:41AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
...
>> I can see a couple of options here, but I'm not sure either of them
>> are good. Comments would be most welcome!
>>
>> 1.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:17:52AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>Hi Steve!
>
>On 6/10/19 4:37 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> 1. Update the docs to mention this - this is a new thing needed to
>> get netboot working with Buster. It's *currently* inconsi
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 02:32:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 03:37 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Any other suggestions on what we could do? Let me know what you
>> think...
>
>Is signing an extra, d-i specific, grubnetXX.efi image out
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:35:33PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:15:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> The prefix variable is very much a single value, yes. It's used and
>> dereferenced all over the place inside grub as a single const ch
this machine? I'm guessing UEFI -
the splash menu should say "UEFI" on it if so...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could
ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs." -- Mike Andrews
_color=black
linux/install.amd/vmlinuz vga=788 theme=dark --- quiet
initrd /install.amd/gtk/initrd.gz
}
Can you reliably reproduce what you've seen?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Managing a volunteer open source project is a lot like herding
kittens, except the kittens randomly appear and disappear because they
have day jobs." -- Matt Mackall
es good support for all Debian goals. Gnome does not
>currently provide as seamless accessibility support as MATE does.
That's all OK, but it would be lovely to have some warning that "dark
theme" is *meant* for the visually-impaired. I'd just seen this as an
apparently
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:49:10PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Steve McIntyre, le lun. 17 juin 2019 12:41:40 +0100, a ecrit:
>> That's all OK, but it would be lovely to have some warning that "dark
>> theme" is *meant* for the visually-impaired. I'd just seen
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 01:05:01PM +0200, Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
>Tags: patch
>
>Added patch:
>https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide/merge_requests/7
Merged, thanks for your contribution!
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st..
t;
>I've looked as best I know how to find a netinstall iso.
There are links at the bottom of the mail you were replying to,
including:
https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I used to be the first kid on the block wanting a cranial implant,
now I want to be the first with a cranial firewall. " -- Charlie Stross
e that noticeably
took time?
I don't use Virtualbox myself, but I'm regularly using kvm to do test
installations and it's really quick. Are you using exactly the same
settings for Virtualbox as for the other distros you mentioned?
Pondering if there's a performance probl
gle CD for a minimal xfce
installation. This is the same for multiple architrectures.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"I suspect most samba developers are already technically insane... Of
course, since many of them are Australians, you can't tell." -- Linus Torvalds
's odd. I've just done a test installation of lxqt here in
qemu/kvm using that image and I can't reproduce your problem - see
https://www.einval.com/~steve/tmp/lxqt-rc3.png
from straight after boot. Could you give us a copy of your
installation syslog please?
--
Steve McIntyre, C
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 02:09:24AM +, Kevin Williams wrote:
>On 7/4/19 11:21 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> That's odd. I've just done a test installation of lxqt here in
>> qemu/kvm using that image and I can't reproduce your problem - see
>>
>&g
d - install to the
removable media path too. See
https://wiki.debian.org/UEFI#Force_grub-efi_installation_to_the_removable_media_path
for more information. Merging the bugs...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane
. Could be tricky!
> - Auguest 31st
> - September 7th
Either of these would work for me.
>We also have a point release of 9.10 to fit in some time - would the same
>day or adjacent weekends be preferable?
Happy to do a double-header again.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
e're trying to track down what's causing this bug, as a few people
have seen things like this. Can I ask what computer you have, please?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
1 - 100 of 1167 matches
Mail list logo
