On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 10:53 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 1/22/2019 7:08 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Alternatively, we could make pigz a strict build requirement but
> > > that sounds a little antisocial.
> > Right.
> In what way do you consider this antisocial and what's speaking
> against
Philipp,
> > > Alternatively, we could make pigz a strict build requirement but
> > > that sounds a little antisocial.
> >
> > Right.
>
> In what way do you consider this antisocial and what's speaking against
> doing that?
I was using this word in a somewhat romantic sense; fewer
dependencies
Hi Cyril,
> I think I'd prefer closing this very bug report whenever what's in
> git gets uploaded
That would definitely work for me. Indeed, it would probably help
separate discussions/issues correctly as any followups are likely =
to be much more specific.
> half the build time is spent
On 1/22/2019 7:08 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Alternatively, we could make pigz a strict build requirement but
>> that sounds a little antisocial.
> Right.
In what way do you consider this antisocial and what's speaking against
doing that? If it's about CPU time, then maybe it should obey the
Hi Chris,
Chris Lamb (2019-01-21):
> > That's looking good but I'm seeing new warnings because of gzip's
> > being unhappy about the GZIP environment variable.
>
> Interesting. However when you say "new" warnings I don't believe my
> patch set actually added/changed this; indeed, it has not
Dear Cyril,
Thank you for your review and timely merge.
> That's looking good but I'm seeing new warnings because of gzip's being
> unhappy about the GZIP environment variable.
Interesting. However when you say "new" warnings I don't believe my
patch set actually added/changed this; indeed, it
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #900918 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Please make the generated
images reproducible
Added tag(s) pending.
--
900918: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900918
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Cyril Brulebois (2019-01-19):
> The mini.iso has apparently other changes… I'm attaching the diffoscope
> output. Could this be because of missing tweaks to the xorriso calls in
> build/config/x86.cfg? (In which case build/config/arm.cfg might need an
> update as well.)
Cyril Brulebois (2019-01-19):
> Back to d-i results: I'm seeing small differences in the generated
> -images tarball, that I'll try to investigate. I'll probably push the
> series anyway, as these patches are helping anyway. :)
Here are the differences I'm seeing by building multiple times in
Hi Chris,
Chris Lamb (2019-01-19):
> > * 0c19a29645a6a3136f3a51da5d5cf1cfcec5fdfb mentions file system
> >ordering only, but that's just the sort part
>
> I've split this commit and it is much clearer now.
Perfect, thanks.
> > * 71391967763708055a65ed68999db8f4ea6fc6e6 sets “deb1”
[Keeping Kibi in CC as requested off-list, dropping mtools@p.d.o]
Dear Kibi,
First, thank you so much for your review. I believe I have resolve
all of your issues on the corresponding merge request, as well as
rebasing it against the current master:
Hello Chris,
First off: Thanks a lot for your work, and for your patience.
Chris Lamb (2019-01-12):
> I would dearly love to have reproducible installer images for buster
> and indeed this would be a good thing to provide and offer, let alone
> announce in the release notes, etc.
>
> Now that
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
> that debian-installer's images were not reproducible.
>
> I have created merge request #3 [1] on salsa with a patch series
> to address this.
>
> [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/
> [1]
On 11th June 2018, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > mtools: please make the output reproducible (uninitialised memory)
> > mtools: please make the output reproducible (directory timestamps)
>
> I'd dearly love to ensure there are no blockers to making the Debian
> Installer images to be reproducible well
Dear Anibal,
> mtools: please make the output reproducible (uninitialised memory)
> mtools: please make the output reproducible (directory timestamps)
I'd dearly love to ensure there are no blockers to making the Debian
Installer images to be reproducible well in advance of the «buster»
release.
Control: block 900918 by 900409 900410
This requires fixes to mtools, marked as blocking bugs.
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that debian-installer's images were not
17 matches
Mail list logo
