Re: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.64_multi.changes is NEW
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:34 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: We should wait until those are accepted on mirrors to avoid breaking dailies. But except from that it's safe. Thanks, I'll wait at least 24 hours after the package goes through NEW before I enable netboot-xen. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: She Said Destroy - Time Like Vines Eloquence is logic on fire. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.64_multi.changes is NEW
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:02 +, Debian Installer wrote: (new) kernel-image-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem-di_1.64_i386.udeb extra debian-installer Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer This package contains the Linux kernel image for the Debian installer boot images. It does _not_ provide a usable kernel for your full Debian system. Once this has passed through NEW does that mean it is safe/OK to enable the netboot-xen flavour? Or are the nightly images built against testing rather than unstable? We like to do things differently than normal people. Mostly to keep D-I development mysterious and elite ;-) - daily D-I builds are built in unstable and use udebs from unstable - D-I uploads are built in unstable and use udebs from testing - daily sid_d-i CD images are built using daily D-I builds, udebs from unstable and regular packages from testing - daily lenny_d-i CD images are built using current D-I builds and udebs from testing, and regular packages from testing - weekly CD images are built using current D-I builds and udebs from testing, and regular packages from testing The last two are also what's used for D-I beta and RC releases (with minor changes like labeling). The sid_d-i CDs are what's normally linked as daily CD images from the D-I project page; when preparing for a release those will link to lenny_d-i CDs. All of the above are hardcoded to install lenny (at least by default), i.e. the codename of the current testing. And to be complete: - official uploads to stable are built in stable and use udebs from stable + proposed-updates - official CD builds use everything from stable and thus can only be built _after_ the archive has already been updated to a new stable (point) release I've also added this info to the D-I internals document. Cheers, FJP signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.64_multi.changes is NEW
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 10:41 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 20 July 2008, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:02 +, Debian Installer wrote: (new) kernel-image-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem-di_1.64_i386.udeb extra debian-installer Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer This package contains the Linux kernel image for the Debian installer boot images. It does _not_ provide a usable kernel for your full Debian system. Once this has passed through NEW does that mean it is safe/OK to enable the netboot-xen flavour? Or are the nightly images built against testing rather than unstable? We like to do things differently than normal people. Mostly to keep D-I development mysterious and elite ;-) ;-) Thanks for the info, very useful. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: She Said Destroy - Shapeshifter He that would govern others, first should be the master of himself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.64_multi.changes is NEW
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:02 +, Debian Installer wrote: (new) kernel-image-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem-di_1.64_i386.udeb extra debian-installer Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer This package contains the Linux kernel image for the Debian installer boot images. It does _not_ provide a usable kernel for your full Debian system. Once this has passed through NEW does that mean it is safe/OK to enable the netboot-xen flavour? Or are the nightly images built against testing rather than unstable? Ian. -- Ian Campbell He who foresees calamities suffers them twice over. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.64_multi.changes is NEW
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:02 +, Debian Installer wrote: (new) kernel-image-2.6.25-2-686-bigmem-di_1.64_i386.udeb extra debian-installer Linux kernel binary image for the Debian installer This package contains the Linux kernel image for the Debian installer boot images. It does _not_ provide a usable kernel for your full Debian system. Once this has passed through NEW does that mean it is safe/OK to enable the netboot-xen flavour? Or are the nightly images built against testing rather than unstable? We should wait until those are accepted on mirrors to avoid breaking dailies. But except from that it's safe. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
