installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20220129 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2023-02-28

It is affected by these RC bugs:
1030007: installation-guide: must document non-free-firmware support
 https://bugs.debian.org/1030007



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20220129 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, 
CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192
 https://bugs.debian.org/1011146



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20220129 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-03-24

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
965883: xdelta3: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
 https://bugs.debian.org/965883



This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl

Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20191229+rebuild1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
2020-07-30

It is affected by these RC bugs:
963450: installation-guide: FTBFS: 
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/xelatex/xecjk/xeCJK.sty: File `ctexhook.sty' 
not found.

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Samuel Thibault]

Hello,

Holger Wansing, le dim. 12 juil. 2020 21:40:16 +0200, a ecrit:
> Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> > installation-guide 20191229+rebuild1 is marked for autoremoval from testing 
> > on 2020-07-20
> > 
> > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > 963450: installation-guide: FTBFS: 
> > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/xelatex/xecjk/xeCJK.sty: File 
> > `ctexhook.sty' not found.
> 
> would you mind uploading installation-guide some day in the near future?
> The fix for 963450 above is alredy included.

Done so!

Samuel

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Holger Wansing]

Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> installation-guide 20191229+rebuild1 is marked for autoremoval from testing 
> on 2020-07-20
> 
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 963450: installation-guide: FTBFS: 
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/xelatex/xecjk/xeCJK.sty: File 
> `ctexhook.sty' not found.
> 

Samuel,

would you mind uploading installation-guide some day in the near future?
The fix for 963450 above is alredy included.


Thanks
Holger



-- 
Holger Wansing 
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20191229+rebuild1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
2020-07-20

It is affected by these RC bugs:
963450: installation-guide: FTBFS: 
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/xelatex/xecjk/xeCJK.sty: File `ctexhook.sty' 
not found.

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Samuel Thibault]

Michael Biebl, le mer. 26 sept. 2018 19:53:22 +0200, a ecrit:
> Am 26.09.2018 um 19:50 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> > Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> >> installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> >> 2018-10-11
> >>
> >> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> >> 898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "svn" 
> >> to "Salsa" and "git"
> > 
> > we got this note today.
> > 
> > However, the mentioned bug #898665 has been closed with the latest upload
> > 3 days ago.
> > 
> > What can be done about this?
> 
> ttbomk there were some debbugs related issues the last couple of days
> which should be solved by now.

Actually the real issue is that the 20180603 version of
installation-guide migrated to testing while it shouldn't have. It's
that version which is marked as to be removed, so no worry.

At least, https://packages.qa.debian.org/i/installation-guide.html now
says

Updating installation-guide fixes old bugs: #898665

So I don't think we have anything to do about it.

Samuel

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Michael Biebl]

Am 26.09.2018 um 19:50 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
> 
> Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
>> installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
>> 2018-10-11
>>
>> It is affected by these RC bugs:
>> 898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "svn" 
>> to "Salsa" and "git"
> 
> we got this note today.
> 
> However, the mentioned bug #898665 has been closed with the latest upload
> 3 days ago.
> 
> 
> What can be done about this?
> 

ttbomk there were some debbugs related issues the last couple of days
which should be solved by now.

Don should know more.

Regards,
Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> 2018-10-11
> 
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "svn" to 
> "Salsa" and "git"

we got this note today.

However, the mentioned bug #898665 has been closed with the latest upload
3 days ago.


What can be done about this?

Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.1 under 
D E B I A N   L I N U X   9   " S T R E T C H " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20180603 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-10-11

It is affected by these RC bugs:
898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "svn" to 
"Salsa" and "git"

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Holger Wansing, le dim. 13 mai 2018 19:51:50 +, a ecrit:
> > So let's go for an upload.
> > Samuel, maybe?
> 
> Uploaded now.

Great, thanks.

As expected, now the website displays the guide for Buster, what is wrong,
it should still display the guide for Stretch.
This is caused by the upload, which is the first upload for Buster.

I have fixed the guide release on the website in
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/commit/f02a61c6d43c3b2f141ad64a837c33fbd0f56fb8

Waiting for the website rebuild, fingers crossed


Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.1 under 
D E B I A N   L I N U X   9   " S T R E T C H " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Samuel Thibault]

Hello,

Holger Wansing, le dim. 13 mai 2018 19:51:50 +, a ecrit:
> So let's go for an upload.
> Samuel, maybe?

Uploaded now.

Samuel

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-31

It is affected by these RC bugs:
897529: installation-guide: FTBFS
898665: installation-guide: [installation-guide] change "Alioth" and "svn" to 
"Salsa" and "git"

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Holger Wansing]

Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Heya,
> 
> Holger Wansing  (2018-05-13):
> > However, there is much more work to do here, "svn" and "alioth" is
> > often mentioned in the manual.
> 
> That's fair. But maybe we should track this as a different RC bug (just
> to make extra sure this doesn't go unnoticed/unfixed until the release),
> which could be closed later on?

ACK.
 
> > And:
> > maybe the workflow of xml-based translations is affected by git migration?
> > Tracking the up-to-date-status of those files is handled with svn revision
> > numbers, which are no longer available now IMHO.
> > How to deal with this?
> > Is it worse to overwork the relevant scripts, to make them work with git
> > hashes, or should we just drop xml-based translations altogether now?
> > Most translations have switched to po already, from the up-to-date
> > languages only Czech is left on xml.
> 
> I don't have stats handy, but if there's only Czech around, I think time
> would be better spent moving it from xml to po?

Yes, that's my impression too.

> I suppose this is a
> transition that had been underway for a while and was never completed?

Yes, maybe.

> I'm not sure whether we should work on porting any other xml-based
> translations if there's nobody active on them?

Generally correct.
eu and pt_br could stay as they are now, for possible future use.
 
> > > > However, that would be an upload for Buster (there's "Bump release
> > > > name to buster" in the changelog).
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure why that would be an issue? The manual documents the buster
> > > installation process (which shouldn't have changed too much?), but the
> > > upload targets unstable as usual?
> > 
> > I remembered some trouble with the debian-refcard, where the
> > publication on the debian.org website was affected, because the
> > website directly uses the latest uploaded package version.
> 
> I think we've had fixes on the website generation framework to handle
> that problem exactly. If we spot issues (again), we should work on
> fixing them, rather than being limited in our upload capacity on the
> installation guide side, I think?

Yes, right.
 
> > But the installation-guide is handled differently here apparently, so
> > that's most probably not a problem here...
> 
> We'll see. :)

Ok  :-)
So let's go for an upload.
Samuel, maybe?


Holger

Holger

-- 
Sent from my Jolla phone
http://www.jolla.com/

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Cyril Brulebois]

Heya,

Holger Wansing  (2018-05-13):
> However, there is much more work to do here, "svn" and "alioth" is
> often mentioned in the manual.

That's fair. But maybe we should track this as a different RC bug (just
to make extra sure this doesn't go unnoticed/unfixed until the release),
which could be closed later on?

Steve, do we have to have installation-guide in testing to build Alpha
or RC images?

> And:
> maybe the workflow of xml-based translations is affected by git migration?
> Tracking the up-to-date-status of those files is handled with svn revision
> numbers, which are no longer available now IMHO.
> How to deal with this?
> Is it worse to overwork the relevant scripts, to make them work with git
> hashes, or should we just drop xml-based translations altogether now?
> Most translations have switched to po already, from the up-to-date
> languages only Czech is left on xml.

I don't have stats handy, but if there's only Czech around, I think time
would be better spent moving it from xml to po? I suppose this is a
transition that had been underway for a while and was never completed?
I'm not sure whether we should work on porting any other xml-based
translations if there's nobody active on them?

> Christian, any opinion on this?

… but I'm definitely happy to hear more about this from Christian or
others.

Again, I'm so sorry this is getting kind of forced onto us, but I don't
think it would have been reasonable to take responsibility for
maintaining an svn server forever anyway. :(

> > > However, that would be an upload for Buster (there's "Bump release
> > > name to buster" in the changelog).
> > 
> > I'm not sure why that would be an issue? The manual documents the buster
> > installation process (which shouldn't have changed too much?), but the
> > upload targets unstable as usual?
> 
> I remembered some trouble with the debian-refcard, where the
> publication on the debian.org website was affected, because the
> website directly uses the latest uploaded package version.

I think we've had fixes on the website generation framework to handle
that problem exactly. If we spot issues (again), we should work on
fixing them, rather than being limited in our upload capacity on the
installation guide side, I think?

> But the installation-guide is handled differently here apparently, so
> that's most probably not a problem here...

We'll see. :)


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Cyril Brulebois  wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Holger Wansing  (2018-05-10):
> > Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> > > installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> > > 2018-05-31
> > > 
> > > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > > 897529: installation-guide: FTBFS
> > 
> > This is because of the "ID xxx-yyy already defined" validation errors",
> > which has already been reported in 
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880210
> > and which was already fixed in svn repo (oh, this is now git).
> > 
> > Maybe we should do an upload to get this fixed in the archive?
> 
> That would be a good idea (along with an extra commit to update Vcs-* to
> salsa, see my latest reply in the salsa thread).

Done.

However, there is much more work to do here, "svn" and "alioth" is often 
mentioned in the manual.
That would need some more time (at least for me).

And:
maybe the workflow of xml-based translations is affected by git migration?
Tracking the up-to-date-status of those files is handled with svn revision
numbers, which are no longer available now IMHO.
How to deal with this?
Is it worse to overwork the relevant scripts, to make them work with git
hashes, or should we just drop xml-based translations altogether now?
Most translations have switched to po already, from the up-to-date
languages only Czech is left on xml.

Christian, any opinion on this?

> > However, that would be an upload for Buster (there's "Bump release
> > name to buster" in the changelog).
> 
> I'm not sure why that would be an issue? The manual documents the buster
> installation process (which shouldn't have changed too much?), but the
> upload targets unstable as usual?

I remembered some trouble with the debian-refcard, where the publication
on the debian.org website was affected, because the website directly uses
the latest uploaded package version.
But the installation-guide is handled differently here apparently, so
that's most probably not a problem here...


Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.1 under 
D E B I A N   L I N U X   9   " S T R E T C H " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hi,

Holger Wansing  (2018-05-10):
> Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> > installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> > 2018-05-31
> > 
> > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > 897529: installation-guide: FTBFS
> 
> This is because of the "ID xxx-yyy already defined" validation errors",
> which has already been reported in 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880210
> and which was already fixed in svn repo (oh, this is now git).
> 
> Maybe we should do an upload to get this fixed in the archive?

That would be a good idea (along with an extra commit to update Vcs-* to
salsa, see my latest reply in the salsa thread).

> However, that would be an upload for Buster (there's "Bump release
> name to buster" in the changelog).

I'm not sure why that would be an issue? The manual documents the buster
installation process (which shouldn't have changed too much?), but the
upload targets unstable as usual?


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Debian testing autoremoval watch  wrote:
> installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> 2018-05-31
> 
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 897529: installation-guide: FTBFS

This is because of the "ID xxx-yyy already defined" validation errors",
which has already been reported in 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880210
and which was already fixed in svn repo (oh, this is now git).

Maybe we should do an upload to get this fixed in the archive?
However, that would be an upload for Buster (there's
"Bump release name to buster" in the changelog).
Hmm ...


Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.1 under 
D E B I A N   L I N U X   9   " S T R E T C H " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20170614 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-31

It is affected by these RC bugs:
897529: installation-guide: FTBFS

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Cyril Brulebois]

Samuel Thibault  (2017-04-19):
> I didn't have instructions, so I made an upload while taking notes, now
> in doc/releasing.txt :)

Much appreciated, thanks!


KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Samuel Thibault]

Hello,

Cyril Brulebois, on mer. 19 avril 2017 00:19:07 +0200, wrote:
> Debian testing autoremoval watch  (2017-04-18):
> > installation-guide 20170312 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> > 2017-04-28
> > 
> > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > 859150: installation-guide: leaves many /tmp/tmp* files behind
> 
> I guess we should upload it already? I can do that myself if you have
> instructions for me (haven't touched svn in a while, even less so when
> it's time to release from it).

I didn't have instructions, so I made an upload while taking notes, now
in doc/releasing.txt :)

Samuel

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hi,

Debian testing autoremoval watch  (2017-04-18):
> installation-guide 20170312 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> 2017-04-28
> 
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 859150: installation-guide: leaves many /tmp/tmp* files behind

I guess we should upload it already? I can do that myself if you have
instructions for me (haven't touched svn in a while, even less so when
it's time to release from it).

Thanks already.


KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20170312 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-04-28

It is affected by these RC bugs:
859150: installation-guide: leaves many /tmp/tmp* files behind

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Cyril Brulebois]

Debian testing autoremoval watch  (2017-04-07):
> installation-guide 20161031 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
> 2017-04-28
> 
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 859150: installation-guide: leaves many /tmp/tmp* files behind

That's an indirect reminder we should get a new installation-guide into
unstable, then testing, for RC 3. Any takers? :)


KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20161031 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-04-28

It is affected by these RC bugs:
859150: installation-guide: leaves many /tmp/tmp* files behind

Processed: Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

 reassign -1 www.debian.org
Bug #763005 [installation-guide-amd64] installation-guide-amd64: website for 
wheezy leads to jessie installation guide
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-guide-amd64' to 'www.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions wheezy.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #763005 to the same values 
previously set
 severity -1 normal
Bug #763005 [www.debian.org] installation-guide-amd64: website for wheezy leads 
to jessie installation guide
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'

-- 
763005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b763005.14130922965859.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

installation-guide 20140916 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-10-26

It is affected by these RC bugs:
763005: installation-guide-amd64: website for wheezy leads to jessie 
installation guide


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xdavu-gb...@franck.debian.org

Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Karsten Merker]

Control: reassign -1 www.debian.org
Control: severity -1 normal
thanks

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 04:39:03AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch 
wrote:
 installation-guide 20140916 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
 2014-10-26
 
 It is affected by these RC bugs:
 763005: installation-guide-amd64: website for wheezy leads to jessie 
 installation guide

From looking at the bug report this has not actually been a bug
in the installation-guide package, but a problem in the cron job
that puts the installtion guide onto the website, so this should
not result in a package removal from testing.

The cron job has been manually fixed up, so the actual problem
(wrong version of the guide on the website) does not occur
anymore at the moment.  What is still open is how to change the
cronjob to handle this better/automatically in the future, but
that IMHO does not justify an RC bug against the manual itself.

I therefore assign this bug to www.debian.org and lower the
severity to normal.

Regards,
Karsten
-- 
Gem. Par. 28 Abs. 4 Bundesdatenschutzgesetz widerspreche ich der Nutzung
sowie der Weitergabe meiner personenbezogenen Daten für Zwecke der
Werbung sowie der Markt- oder Meinungsforschung.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141012053801.ga4...@excalibur.cnev.de