Re: Multiple topics

2002-04-09 Thread utsl
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:26:56AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > What I ran into with 5.0 was that there was a define that you set to > > enable compiling with gcc 3.x, and there were some #ifdef's to make it > > work. However

Re: Bug#141847: O: dupload -- Utility to upload Debian packages.

2002-04-09 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:14:55PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote: > > > > Same thing for simple tools. > > I can't see any real reason in which way two tools to upload Debian > > packages make Debian better. Please give an explanati

Re: Multiple topics

2002-04-09 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:47:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What I ran into with 5.0 was that there was a define that you set to > enable compiling with gcc 3.x, and there were some #ifdef's to make it > work. However, that define also enabled building gcc 3.x from the > FreeBSD source

Re: Multiple topics

2002-04-09 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:15:46PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > >1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? > > How clean do you mean? The standard compiler in -CURRENT is a gcc 3.1 > snapshot. Oh, that's probably clean enough to start working with. It definitely says to

Re: Multiple topics

2002-04-09 Thread utsl
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:37:41PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:54:29PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: > > > Two main things: > > > > > > 1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean?

Re: Multiple topics

2002-04-09 Thread Tony Finch
>1) FreeBSD 5.0 pre-release... does anyone know if it's GCC 3.x clean? How clean do you mean? The standard compiler in -CURRENT is a gcc 3.1 snapshot. >2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for this on the >various BSD flavors differ significantly, but all appear to share some >b

Re: Multiple topics

2002-04-09 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Joel Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020409 03:11]: > 2) pmake (aka /usr/src/usr.bin/make) - the source tree for this on the > various BSD flavors differ significantly, but all appear to share some > basic level of functionality. How similar are they? I'm looking at taking > over the pmake package, an