Re: *BSD and GNU/*BSD nomenclature

2003-06-14 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:36:32PM +0100, ${john}$ wrote: what worries me here is that GNU/ is added without fully understanding what it means, just to keep RMS happy. Well I'm suggesting it be added as a sensible way to distinguish, not to appease anyone. The difference between it and

Re: *BSD and GNU/*BSD nomenclature (was: Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches)

2003-06-14 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:23:22PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: erm, so that was a typo? Well, if you read the part of the message you elided, I laid out exactly what the system is and isn't. You haven't answered my question about What is a GNU-based system?, so I cannot tell you whether it