To: requ...@bugs.debian.org
cont...@? Never seen request@ :)
user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
usertag 341837 + kfreebsd
Valid for both requ...@bugs.debian.org and cont...@bugs.debian.org ;-)
From http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg2.html:
The mechanics are simpl
Petr Salinger (04/08/2009):
> To: requ...@bugs.debian.org
cont...@? Never seen request@ :)
> user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> usertag 341837 + kfreebsd
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Howdy,
Aurelien asked me about getting GRUB 2 working on GNU/kFreeBSD. There's
been much work in upstream to implement loading for kernel of FreeBSD, and
recently some polish in the installer, etc.
grub-mkconfig (update-grub's backend), however, still generates entries
based on the single /boot
Luca Favatella dixit:
>* the patch against current kfreebsd d-i svn
Try something like this:
IMGSZ?= 20m
define mkfs.ufs1
fs=$$(mktemp -d) ; \
cp -a $(TREE)/* $${fs}/ ; \
tmp=$$(mktemp -d) ; \
makefs -t ffs -s ${IMGSZ} -o minfree=0 $${tmp}/ufs $${fs}/ ; \
mv $${tmp}/ufs
endef
define mk
Luca Favatella dixit:
>I'm attaching
>* a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built using
>makefs
Please attach screenshots in ASCII. I mostly read my eMails either
via ssh or on an 80486DLC laptop from 1993 with not enough RAM for
XFree86®, so I cannot view any images.
>H
The old unused email adress is misleading. All currently open bugs are
tagged using both users, see [1]. The majority of recent submissions are
by Aurelien and Cyril and me. After agreement, it remains to change wiki
pages [2], [3].
Do you agree with such switch ?
Sure, go ahead.
KiBi.
I am
I marked the failing packages as
follows (as it *seems* to me, after a few seconds glance):
- ˙˙Needs porting.˙˙: Might work on GNU/kFreeBSD;
- ˙˙Needs porting?˙˙: Might be Linux-specific, or very hard to port.
- ˙˙Linux-specific?˙˙: Looks very much like Linux-only, but well˙˙
Depending on what o
Petr Salinger a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> currently we use due to historical issues
>
> User: glibc-bsd-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> We use usertag "kfreebsd" as majority bugs apllies to both of
> kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 and porter set is the same for both.
>
> I pro
Petr Salinger (04/08/2009):
> In fact, I expect there will be very low rate of successful-logs,
> may be many of the packages should go into Packages-arch-specific
> with lines "!kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !hurd-i386".
Moving to -bsd@, tiny explanation: I marked the failing packages as
follows
Petr Salinger (04/08/2009):
> Do you agree with such switch ?
Sure, go ahead.
(I always have to dig up an old bug to copy/paste the right stuff. :))
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I tested makefs in kfreebsd d-i, and I have some problems.
I got makefs sources using
dget -u
http://www.freewrt.org/~tg/debs/dists/sid/wtf/pkgs/makefs/makefs_20090724-1.dsc
I built it using
dpkg-buildpackage -tc
I'm attaching
* a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built
Hi,
currently we use due to historical issues
User: glibc-bsd-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
We use usertag "kfreebsd" as majority bugs apllies to both of
kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 and porter set is the same for both.
I propose to change "User:" into "debian-bsd@list
12 matches
Mail list logo
