Re: Bug#559398: goffice0.4: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: headers/includes issues

2009-12-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (04/12/2009): | In file included from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:228, | from /usr/include/libglade-2.0/glade/glade-xml.h:26, | from ../../../goffice/gtk/goffice-gtk.h:23, | from

Re: Bug#559398: goffice0.4: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: headers/includes issues

2009-12-07 Thread Petr Salinger
| /usr/include/bits/stat.h:198: error: expected ')' before 'dev' | /usr/include/bits/stat.h:199: error: expected ')' before 'dev' it looks like this bug is still present in the latest upload of the kfreebsd headers. The bug is in our headers, but the header comes from libc0.1-dev, not

Re: Bug#559398: goffice0.4: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: headers/includes issues

2009-12-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (07/12/2009): The bug is in our headers, but the header comes from libc0.1-dev, not kfreebsd-kernel-headers. Oh, indeed. I guess some bits of sleep might help… I expect more problems would be on our side, so it might be better for unclear cases to bother

Bug#559980: aptitude: Totally broken on GNU/kFreeBSD

2009-12-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.1.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Broken package manager, broken d-i, etc. User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, for quite a while, we've had broken GNU/kFreeBSD d-i images, users complaining about installation being stuck at 1%.

Purpose driving kfreebsd?

2009-12-07 Thread Brian Gupta
Hey guys, I think it's awesome that you have done this, and that Debian is supporting it as official port. I was looking for FAQs and such, do you have any? Basically I want to learn about why as much as the technical what driving this port. I'd also love to see if anyone is interested in giving