[I'm not subscribed to -bsd; please Cc me on any replies originating
from there, if relevant]
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 00:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
the second Squeeze point release (6.0.2) is now scheduled for
Saturday, June 25th.
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being
re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package
content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from
versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:32 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being
re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package
content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:03:03 +
with message-id e1qarnb-0002oh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#594183: fixed in freebsd-buildutils 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594183,
regarding can't build kernel modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:03:03 +
with message-id e1qarnb-0002on...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#625261: fixed in freebsd-buildutils 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #625261,
regarding buildutils are shipped with unusable paths for kfreebsd
to be marked as done.
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-buildutils/freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2.dsc
freebsd-buildutils_8.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz
libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
Reject Reasons:
md5sum for
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz
doesn't match freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc.
size for
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz
doesn't match
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:47:33 +
with message-id e1qasuf-0005ef...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#631544: fixed in freebsd-libs 8.2+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #631544,
regarding libusb2-dev: libusb.h not useable (?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz
libsbuf0_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
Accepted:
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc
to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds1-2.dsc
libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-libs/libcam-dev_8.2+ds1-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Package: kfreebsd-image-8.1-1-686
Version: 8.1+dfsg-8
Severity: normal
The photos at
http://iki.fi/lindi/kfreebsd/ufsid-boot-trouble/
have been captured from the display of my aspire one laptop that boots
debian kfreebsd-i386 squeeze from a USB flash drive.
As you can see, the kernel does not
2011/6/26 Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi:
Is there a parameter like rootwait=N in Linux? I'm ok with slow bootup
but I'm not ok with unreliable bootup :-)
Not exactly the same but, check if this helps:
set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
2011/6/26 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
2011/6/26 Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi:
Is there a parameter like rootwait=N in Linux? I'm ok with slow bootup
but I'm not ok with unreliable bootup :-)
Not exactly the same but, check if this helps:
set
Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes:
set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000
Unfortunately this does not seem to help. I tried also 3 but it
clearly does not wait.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Robert Millan r...@debian.org writes:
set kFreeBSD.kern.cam.scsi_delay=15000
Unfortunately this does not seem to help. I tried also 3 but it
clearly does not wait.
Where/how are you setting the value? My understanding is that if that
Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu writes:
Where/how are you setting the value?
I hit e in grub to get the menu entries. Then I added it as a new
line.
My understanding is that if that new value is read, the kernel should
force a delay of that long on the entire boot process, which cannot be
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu writes:
Where/how are you setting the value?
I hit e in grub to get the menu entries. Then I added it as a new
line.
Hmm, I am not very familiar with the kFreeBSD boot process, but this value
is normally set in
Hi!
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 17:03:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
I noticed libmd has its own directory in SVN. Is there any
reason for not merging it in freebsd-libs?
If it's because of Architecture: any setting, note that
freebsd-libs already includes portable libraries (like
libsbuf).
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 19:10:46 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: libbsd-dev
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Please provide link_ntoa() so that it can be removed from
[freebsd-utils]/debian/patches/030_arp_libbsd.diff
Implementation from FreeBSD is available in:
2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org:
The other reason is that the licenses in the
FreeBSD tree are a bit unfortunate so my plan is to use the OpenBSD
implementation instead.
Are you sure there the OpenBSD version will work for FreeBSD
userland? The reporter of this bug mentioned geom.
2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org:
The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific
‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match any Linux
sockaddr structure, the closes one is sockaddr_ll, but not quite the
same, also no standard function returns such type,
2011/6/26 Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu:
I hit e in grub to get the menu entries. Then I added it as a new
line.
Hmm, I am not very familiar with the kFreeBSD boot process, but this value
is normally set in the FreeBSD loader; on stock FreeBSD it would be in
/boot/loader.conf .
When using
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:27:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org:
The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific
‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match any Linux
sockaddr structure, the closes one is sockaddr_ll, but
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:21:03AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 00:27:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/6/27 Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org:
The problem with link_ntoa() is that it relies on the BSD specific
‘struct sockaddr_dl’ which for example does not match
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 492889 by 609757
Bug #492889 [freebsd-utils] freebsd-utils does not contain geli
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 492889: 609757
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
492889:
27 matches
Mail list logo
