2011/7/22 Samuel Thibault :
> David wrote:
>> "still no kbd layout choice in squeeze"
> (kfreebsd)
>
> And I'm sorry to say: there will not be (in squeeze). console-setup was
> recently ported to kfreebsd, but that will not be propagated to squeeze.
Hi Samuel,
Please see: http://lists.debian.org/
David wrote:
> "still no kbd layout choice in squeeze"
(kfreebsd)
And I'm sorry to say: there will not be (in squeeze). console-setup was
recently ported to kfreebsd, but that will not be propagated to squeeze.
That being said, the console-setup-udeb package is not included in
the current images.
On 22 July 2011 00:11, Nicolas Barbier wrote:
> 2011/7/21, David Balažic :
>
>> I went for Debian to _stop_ discovering and reporting new bugs. :(
>
> Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is currently only released as a "technology
> preview", bugs are to be expected. For now, I guess you should Debian
> GNU/Linux
2011/7/21, David Balažic :
> I went for Debian to _stop_ discovering and reporting new bugs. :(
Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is currently only released as a "technology
preview", bugs are to be expected. For now, I guess you should Debian
GNU/Linux if you want a more polished experience.
Nicolas
--
A.
2011/7/21 David Balažic :
> I went for Debian to _stop_ discovering and reporting new bugs. :(
Keep in mind that Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is a "technology preview"
release. It is still under development and doesn't have the same
stability and overall quality you'd usually expect from a Debian
release.
On 21 July 2011 23:42, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> 2011/7/21 David Balažic :
>> Hi!
>>
>> After installing debian kbsd amd64, I rebooted and on the graphical
>> login screen I entered my login data.
>> A dialog appeared, that Power Manager is hanging or not
>> responding, I forgot th
Hi David,
2011/7/21 David Balažic :
> Hi!
>
> After installing debian kbsd amd64, I rebooted and on the graphical
> login screen I entered my login data.
> A dialog appeared, that Power Manager is hanging or not
> responding, I forgot the exact wording.
> There were three button , the second
I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this
would help concluding this debate.
Does anybody have anything to say about this?
I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I
think it just tries to enforce your point of view by presenting your
goa
Hi!
After installing debian kbsd amd64, I rebooted and on the graphical
login screen I entered my login data.
A dialog appeared, that Power Manager is hanging or not
responding, I forgot the exact wording.
There were three button , the second was "Cancel", the third "Logout
Anyway" (???).
Aft
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > >> I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this
> > >> would help concluding this debate.
> > > Does anybody have anything to say about this?
> > I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I
> > think it just tries to enforce
On 21 July 2011 20:23, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/7/21 David Balažic :
>> That worked, thanks.
>>
>> The docs at
>> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/kfreebsd-amd64/ch04s03.html.en
>> should be updated to reflect that mini.iso is the only(?)
>> way to boot from USB stick for kbsd64.
>
> I kn
2011/7/21 Thomas Schmitt :
> But debian-cd does not use grub-mkrescue yet. (I guess it would need
> it capable of Jigdo production, at least.)
>
> Shall we move this topic to debian-cd list ?
Feel free to.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Accepted:
freebsd-net-tools-udeb_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-net-tools-udeb_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
freebsd-net-tools_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
to main/f/freebsd-utils/freebsd-net-tools_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
freebsd-nfs-common_8.2+ds2-3_kfree
freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-3.dsc
freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-3.debian.tar.gz
freebsd-utils_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
freebsd-utils-udeb_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb
kldutils_8.2+ds2-3_kfreebs
Hi,
> > So it would be mainly about asking debian-cd to produce a MBR boot image
> > and to tell genisomage or xorriso to include it (by option -G).
>
> The MBR is just one piece of the boot chain, you need everything else
> to be in place for this to work. This includes (but is not limited
> to)
2011/7/21 David Balažic :
> That worked, thanks.
>
> The docs at
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/kfreebsd-amd64/ch04s03.html.en
> should be updated to reflect that mini.iso is the only(?)
> way to boot from USB stick for kbsd64.
I know. Unfortunately we haven't managed to keep up with up
On Jul 21, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> A more interesting question is: if systemd or upstart were adopted,
> >> would the kFreeBSD porters be willing to implement everything needed
> >> to support on their ports the packages using a non-traditional init
> >> configuration, in the way they consider
2011/7/21 Robert Millan :
>> But for running Debian kFreeBSD inside masshosting
>> environment (what is a real attractive idea) like jail based VServers thats
>> will be the pain in the ass. I've noticed that some guys here are porting
>> jails to Debian kFreeBSD. I hope they will read this post an
On 21 July 2011 00:52, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/7/21 David Balažic :
>> First I tried to cat the kbsd-amd64 netinst iso for the drive, which
>> did not boot
>
> Try that with the mini.iso:
>
> http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-kfreebsd-amd64/current/images/netboot/
T
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 634955 libbsd-dev
Bug #634955 [libkvm-dev] libkvm-dev: include instead
Bug reassigned from package 'libkvm-dev' to 'libbsd-dev'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions freebsd-libs/8.2+ds1-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
reassign 634955 libbsd-dev
thanks
2011/7/21 Thorsten Glaser :
> Hector Oron dixit:
>
>> Someone more knowledgeable on BSD might know best where headers are broken,
>
> /usr/include/nlist.h is correct.
>
>>and which is proper place to fix it.
>
> libbsd broke and should be fixed.
I agree with Tho
2011/7/21 Mats Erik Andersson :
> I have mentioned "2-clause BSD" and "FreeBSD" as synonyms, and I have
> left the license name "FreeBSD" as applying to the make files which
> clearly are originating from the FreeBSD project, as well as for our
> own packaging directory "debian/". This latter assig
2011/7/21 Thomas Schmitt :
> So it would be mainly about asking debian-cd to produce a MBR boot image
> and to tell genisomage or xorriso to include it (by option -G).
The MBR is just one piece of the boot chain, you need everything else
to be in place for this to work. This includes (but is not
2011/7/21 Darko Hojnik :
> Hi there
>
> I'm currently playing again with Debian kFreeBSD based jails under a FreeBSD
> Host.
Make sure you read the FAQ entry [1] and associated links.
[1]
http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_FAQ#Q._Can_I_run_Debian_GNU.2BAC8-kFreeBSD_in_a_chroot_under_Free
2011/7/20 Cyril Brulebois :
>
> > Several people have already explained that it should be possible to
> > write a script, working for most packages, to generate old-style init
> > scripts from systemd service files, allowing for a compatibility
> > wrapper on top of insserv for kfreebsd (until sys
Hi there
I'm currently playing again with Debian kFreeBSD based jails under a
FreeBSD Host. Because Debian mounts linprocfs on /proc and applications
like PostgreSQL does needs it, that brings me inside really ugly
situations. Here a short listening for example
freebsd-one# mount -t linpr
On Jul 20, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> A more interesting question is: if systemd or upstart were adopted,
> would the kFreeBSD porters be willing to implement everything needed
> to support on their ports the packages using a non-traditional init
> configuration, in the way they consider appropriate a
Hector Oron dixit:
> Someone more knowledgeable on BSD might know best where headers are broken,
/usr/include/nlist.h is correct.
>and which is proper place to fix it.
libbsd broke and should be fixed.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
08:05⎜ mika: Does grml have an tool to read Apple
⎜System Log
Dear Robert and all fellows,
torsdag den 21 juli 2011 klockan 10:52 skrev Robert Millan detta:
> 2011/7/21 Mats Erik Andersson :
> > Do feel invited to take part in deciding whether
> > the license names
> >
> > 4-clause BSD, 3-clause BSD, FreeBSD, and ISC
>
> In case this serves, I used "X-clau
Hi,
me:
> > This is obviously because there is no MBR in the System Area of
> > the ISO image.
Robert Millan:
> There should be, I implemented it. As long as grub-mkrescue is used
> to produce the images.
I see.
mini.iso bears Preparer ID "XORRISO-0.5.6 2010.05.04.11 ..."
and several strin
Package: libkvm-dev
Version: 8.2+ds1-3
Severity: important
Hello,
While building gdb/experimental on kfreebsd architectures I get:
In file included from /usr/include/kvm.h:38:0,
from
/build/buildd-gdb_7.3.50~cvs20110627-2-kfreebsd-i386-YFKJaT/gdb-7.3.50~cvs20110627/gdb/bsd-kv
2011/7/21 Mats Erik Andersson :
> Do feel invited to take part in deciding whether
> the license names
>
> 4-clause BSD, 3-clause BSD, FreeBSD, and ISC
In case this serves, I used "X-clause BSD" in fuse4bsd, for the
2-clause license too. I think calling it 2-clause is much less
confusing than "F
2011/7/21 Thomas Schmitt :
> This is obviously because there is no MBR in the System Area of
> the ISO image.
There should be, I implemented it. As long as grub-mkrescue is used
to produce the images.
But I think it's only used for ISO images produced directly by D-I
(i.e. not debian-cd).
--
R
Hi,
David Balazic wrote:
> Is booting the installer from am USB flash drive (key) supported for kbsd
> amd64?
>
> First I tried to cat the kbsd-amd64 netinst iso for the drive, which
> did not boot,
This is obviously because there is no MBR in the System Area of
the ISO image.
Debian/Linux amd6
34 matches
Mail list logo
