Re: Please test zfsutils 9.0~svn226163-1

2011-10-10 Thread Petr Salinger
* We could get rid of the last delta in 01_glibc_kludge.diff and the whole (hacky and ugly) 16-wrap-cdefs.diff if kfreebsd-kernel-headers would export cdefs.h like it does upstream [2]. Could you fix this in kfreebsd-kernel-headers instead? sys/cdefs.h comes from eglibc, it is same on all

Re: Please test zfsutils 9.0~svn226163-1

2011-10-10 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 10.10.2011 07:06, Robert Millan wrote: Hi Arno, Nice work. Would be nice if you could put this on SVN untill it can be uploaded to experimental. You are maintaining zfsutils. If you want, I can certainly do this :) What would be a

Re: Bug#644868: gnustep-back-common: postinst fails: Error: for some reason, argv not properly set up during GNUstep base initialization

2011-10-10 Thread Yavor Doganov
reassign 644868 libgnustep-base1.22 retitle 644868 Programs abort on kfreebsd* when arguments exceed 512 affects 644868 gnustep-back-common block 629477 with 644868 thanks On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:02:25PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: Package: gnustep-back-common Version: 0.20.1-2 Severity:

Processing of kfreebsd-8_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2011-10-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
kfreebsd-8_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.dsc kfreebsd-8_8.2-8.debian.tar.gz kfreebsd-source-8.2_8.2-8_all.deb kfreebsd-headers-8.2-1_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64_8.2-8_kfreebsd-amd64.deb

Bug#644417: marked as done (CPU-faults early on boot (regression))

2011-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:49:34 + with message-id e1rdmn0-0008ba...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#644417: fixed in kfreebsd-8 8.2-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #644417, regarding CPU-faults early on boot (regression) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: Desktop environment

2011-10-10 Thread David Watson
Slim? I don't mind helping with testing; since I'm running kfreebsd as a vm, when I get a chance I'll clone the vm and install wheezy gnome, kde, and xfce. Does pastebin work in kfreebsd? What about the bts package? David Watson e: hiranwat...@gmail.com On 9 October 2011 14:42, Christoph

Re: Desktop environment

2011-10-10 Thread Zac Slade
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, David Watson hiranwat...@gmail.com wrote: Slim? I don't mind helping with testing; since I'm running kfreebsd as a vm, when I get a chance I'll clone the vm and install wheezy gnome, kde, and xfce. Does pastebin work in kfreebsd? What about the bts package?

Searching website for a bug

2011-10-10 Thread David Watson
Hi I'm trying to search www.debian.org/bugs to see if a bug report has been created for an issue I'm having with aptitude. But once I click submit it's taking a long time to do a search. Is this normal? Can I do a CL search in kfreebsd? David e: hiranwat...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Searching website for a bug

2011-10-10 Thread Zac Slade
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:20 PM, David Watson hiranwat...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I'm trying to search www.debian.org/bugs to see if a bug report has been created for an issue I'm having with aptitude. But once I click submit it's taking a long time to do a search. Is this normal? Can I do a CL

Re: Searching website for a bug

2011-10-10 Thread David Watson
So I use reportbug to file bugs too? What about the package debbugs? I installed thinking I need to use it, but reading the doc is making me think otherwise. --Original Message-- From: Zac Slade To: David H. Watson Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD Subject: Re: Searching website for a

Re: New package version releases

2011-10-10 Thread David Watson
If the version exists in wheezy then why is it not showing up even after running apt-get update?$ --Original Message-- From: Zac Slade To: David H. Watson Cc: Mailing List - Debian GNU/*BSD Subject: Re: New package version releases Sent: 10 Oct 2011 22:53 On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:46

Re: New package version releases

2011-10-10 Thread Zac Slade
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:57 PM, David Watson hiranwat...@gmail.com wrote: If the version exists in wheezy then why is it not showing up even after running apt-get update?$ If the version has made it to wheezy then yes. As you can see however, the upgrade hasn't made it to wheezy yet: #

Re: New package version releases

2011-10-10 Thread David Watson
Can I select just one package from sid or do I have to download the whole repo release file? Also I understand that sid's version of aptitude is higher than wheezy, but why would reportbug indicate both stable and unstable have the newer version? --Original Message-- From: Zac Slade To:

Re: New package version releases

2011-10-10 Thread Zac Slade
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:04 PM, David Watson hiranwat...@gmail.com wrote: Can I select just one package from sid or do I have to download the whole repo release file? You will need the whole release file, but you will only need to install packages from sid that are required to meet the

Re: New package version releases

2011-10-10 Thread David Watson
When I run reporbug aptitude as david, I get: Your version (0.6.3-4) of aptitude appears to be out of date. The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive: stable: 0.6.4-1 unstable: 0.6.4-1 I am trying to see if a bug report exists for aptitude, but all I'm getting is