2011/12/10 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org:
The official 9.0 kernel manages to mount the root fs
Maybe they've fixed this bug recently. I just uploaded a new SVN
snapshot to experimental (9.0~svn228246-1), can you try?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Steven,
Please don't add unrelated information to bug reports. If you found a
new bug, you can file it, or we can discuss it in the mailing list(s).
I replaced the CC to BTS with debian-bsd.
2011/12/11 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
which only has kfreebsd-image-8.2-1-amd64 8.2-15
Hi,
On 11/12/11 12:03, Robert Millan wrote:
Please don't add unrelated information to bug reports. If you found a
new bug, you can file it, or we can discuss it in the mailing list(s).
Okay sorry, some of that I ought to file separate bugs for, but
regarding this bug I was really trying to
excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true.
zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of
date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore:
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfsutils
Will this prevent migration?
--
Robert Millan
--
To
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (11/12/2011):
excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true.
zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of
date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore:
That's called “out of date” until removal.
2011/12/11 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
* I managed to install to a new ZFS root under kfreebsd 8.2, upgrade to
kfreebsd 9 and still boot it; so what did we do differently for
Christoph to have this issue?
Hard to say. It's probably just not reproducible every time, or
depends on
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Some are NBS because soname was bumped (0 - 1), and the -dev ones are NBS
because they've been intentionally removed since they're not usable for
external applications to link with.
We can't wait for automated removal because of the ongoing transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 11.12.2011 17:04, Robert Millan wrote:
Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
britney will still not let you migrate then, as you filed a RC bug
yourself to prevent exactly that migration. :)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
2011/12/11 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net:
On 11.12.2011 17:04, Robert Millan wrote:
Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
britney will still not let you migrate then, as you filed a RC bug
yourself to prevent exactly that migration. :)
I know. Migration needs to happen at the same time as
My current summary:
1- kfreebsd-8 images can't currently be used to install *anything*
when zfsutils-udeb 8.3 is being used, i.e. when they fetch their
packages from sid. It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not for netboot.
2-
Package: zfsutils
Version: 8.3~svn226546-6
2011/12/11 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
2.2- zfsutils 8.2 in /target with a kfreebsd-9 runtime breaks
grub-install (even if zfsutils-udeb is 8.3). Will be fixed when
zfsutils 8.3 migrates.
Actually, this is much worse. Even 8.3 zfsutils (or
Package: partman-zfs
Severity: grave
2011/12/11 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
2.3- /boot/zfs/zpool.cache is NOT present!! No idea why this
happens, but potentially it could also break installed systems (since
they attempt to boot using outdated /boot/zfs/zpool.cache that was
generated
2011/12/11 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
1- kfreebsd-8 images can't currently be used to install *anything*
when zfsutils-udeb 8.3 is being used, i.e. when they fetch their
packages from sid. It seems the default is still zfsutils-udeb 8.2
for debian-cd images (netinst, businesscard) but not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 651719 grave
Bug #651719 [zfsutils] new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651719:
14 matches
Mail list logo
