On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:56:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > +#define __FAVOR_BSD 1
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > +#undef __FAVOR_BSD
>
> Shouldn't this kind of fix be in libbsd-dev? E.g. in overlay netinet/in.h:
>
> #if __FAVOR_B
On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
> build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On 31/12/11 20:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
>> build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
>
> Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)?
Hi,
I saw it written th
El 31 de desembre de 2011 4:40, Thorsten Glaser ha escrit:
> Yes, but (a) not for their own stuff but to replace the GNU one
> which has a bootstrapping issue wrt. libglib nowadays (BSD ports
> start from a base OS system and compile everything from source
> on each installation), and (b) my MirCo
On 19 December 2011 14:55, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
> On 19 December 2011 01:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches
>> (hurd,
>> kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures (currently
>> ia64, but more w
5 matches
Mail list logo