I'd like to propose switching and splitting the glibc-bsd repo from svn
to git repositories
My position:
- use svn or git
It does not matter for me.
- packaging-only or full content
I strongly prefer packaging-only.
- one common repository x repository per package
I slightly prefer one
The same problems exists in ufsutils/8.2-3. Please find attached a patch
for the aforementioned version that addresses this issue.
Regards,
Nikos
Index: ufsutils-8.2/sbin/growfs/growfs.c
===
---
On 20.05.2013 08:56, Petr Salinger wrote:
- packaging-only or full content
I strongly prefer packaging-only.
- one common repository x repository per package
I slightly prefer one common.
Note that git unlike svn does not really like check-outs of paths only
within a repository. Hence,
Hi Matthias, hi kFreeBSD porters,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 18.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Guido Günther:
Package: openjdk-7
Version: 7u21-2.3.9-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
attached patch updates Damien's OpenJDK support for kFreeBSD.
Hi,
2013/5/20 Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org
Hi Matthias, hi kFreeBSD porters,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 18.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Guido Günther:
Package: openjdk-7
Version: 7u21-2.3.9-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 02:20:19PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Hi,
2013/5/20 Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org
Hi Matthias, hi kFreeBSD porters,
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:38:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 18.05.2013 19:36, schrieb Guido Günther:
Package: openjdk-7
Hi!
Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org writes:
@porters: can the buildds be updated so we can respin the build?
I've contacted buildd admin of kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} to update buildd
machines to wheezy.
IIRC it related to squeeze vs wheezy schroot (or was it
sbuild). Anyways wheezy
As buildd admin I can't directly do the upgrade
apart from asking DSA to go ahead this which I'll do as soon as wheezy
buildds are figured out for wheezy infrastructure (which is currently
being worked on).
Please ask them to use kfreebsd-9 kernel,
as only it have (backported):
*
retitle 704227 pu: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1
tags 704227 - unblock + wheezy pu
thanks
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
or -11~deb7u1.
I think we'll go with the latter; that should be more
Hi Petr,
On 20/05/13 07:56, Petr Salinger wrote:
- one common repository x repository per package
I slightly prefer one common.
What might be the advantage of this?
And could submodules possibly provide the same convenience? (A
repository that points to all the others).
A downside to a
2013/5/20 Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org
@porters: can the buildds be updated so we can respin the build?
I've contacted buildd admin of kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} to update buildd
machines to wheezy.
Cool. I wonder if we should binNMU in the meantime?
in the meantime, I've pushed
11 matches
Mail list logo
