Thanks Eitan. Forwarding to -bsd
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:09:55 -0500, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com said:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
In article
mit.lcs.mail.freebsd-arch/caf6rxgmdjzvrzanscjnqb8yjbhk2mxayw3bvcu7dvmczmwp...@mail.gmail.com
you write:
The
On 2013-11-30 11:46, Robert Millan wrote:
On 28/11/2013 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough
user interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue
in this state.
We will review this
Helge Deller dixit:
We noticed, that when we manually binmnu-upload packages, which are
already in the *same version* on debian-ports, then debian-ports ACCEPT
When you binNMU packages you add a +b1, +b2, … suffix to their
versions. ITYM porter upload?
those packages, but if we then try to
Gnome guys is not interested in help kFreeBSD because now Gnome is
Linux-only.
FreeBSD guys is porting Gnome 3.6 yet and Debian has 3.10 incoming.
I think is more feasible to bet on a Gnome-derivative DE like MATE
and/or Cinnamon because they are portable and they are interested in
being
On 12/15/13 3:54 AM, Helge Deller wrote:
On 12/15/2013 06:32 AM, Dave Land wrote:
Not sure what's up at debian-ports.org, but I've been trying to
debootstrap 2 different HPPA machines for the last couple days and
have been getting a variety of errors (size mismatches, files not
found when they
On 15/12/13 12:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
Uhm I think we both may have misunderstood. Perhaps 'this state'
just means 'as technology preview'. I.e. normal QA requirements are
no longer waived because of preview status.
This is exactly what we meant; we intend to not do technology previews
for
On 15/12/13 04:22, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Yeah, that's unnecessary.
The program is ported now. What do you wnat? The patch or the package?
Did you patch some existing packaging to produce this? In that case a
debdiff may be ideal.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
Hello Aurelien,
On 12/15/2013 09:03 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
On 12/15/2013 06:32 AM, Dave Land wrote:
Not sure what's up at debian-ports.org, but I've been trying to
debootstrap 2 different HPPA machines for the last couple days
If it's actually improving performance then it's likely some kind of
data / code alignment / caching interplay. It'd be a good project to
hunt that down and figure out what's going on.
-a
On 8 December 2013 11:02, Olivier Cochard-Labbé oliv...@cochard.me wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:16
Hi Thorsten,
thanks for your help!
On 12/15/2013 02:59 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Helge Deller dixit:
We noticed, that when we manually binmnu-upload packages, which are
already in the *same version* on debian-ports, then debian-ports ACCEPT
When you binNMU packages you add a +b1, +b2, …
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
If it's actually improving performance then it's likely some kind of
data / code alignment / caching interplay. It'd be a good project to
hunt that down and figure out what's going on.
From the data presented it *not*
On 15/12/2013 05:16, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hi guys
Look for the IDLE and Eclipse on kFreeBSD...
IDLE almost freezes when I try to open a file, the edit window can't be
closed and the name of the file isn't on top of window.
Eclipse...well, I have eclipse-cdt installed and I
On 15/12/2013 00:52, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi all!
Do you think running 9.2 kernels on stable will be feasible? I fear it
needs some freebsd-{libs,utils} from 9.2 as well? (especially pfctl ..)
You'll have to try to know for sure, but it's probably not as bad as
last major kernel version
Forwarding to the other lists from original thread...
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fwd: possible /dev/random compromise (misplaced trust in RDRAND /
Padlock entropy sources)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:53:19 +0100
From: Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org
To: Robert Millan
Your message dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:47:16 +0100
with message-id 52ae3174.10...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#731144: kfreebsd: drm2 and i915kms kernel modules are
not loaded automatically
has caused the Debian Bug report #731144,
regarding libdrm: obsolete patch for
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013, Robert Millan wrote:
Backporting the fix to these kernels might be a good idea, probably best
routed through an stable update upload (and not a security upload).
This might be a bit complicated due to significant changes in internal
APIs. I'm also unsure if the yarrow
16 matches
Mail list logo
