Hi Robert,
On 19.12.2013 01:40, Robert Millan wrote:
On 18/12/2013 23:48, Robert Millan wrote:
I believe the attached patch should fix this, provided that your kernel is
not affected by #684595 (i.e. use kfreebsd-11 or kfreebsd-downloader).
Erm, sorry. What I meant to say is that for
On 19/12/2013 04:21, Ed Maste wrote:
On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling
newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms
which is aimed at this purpose (I haven't tested it).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 732617 ufsutils 9.2-3
Bug #732617 [grub, apt, dpkg] Latest updates render Debian GNU/kfreebsd unusable
Bug reassigned from package 'grub, apt, dpkg' to 'ufsutils'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #732617 to the same values
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:41:43PM +0100, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
It is related to the package ufsutils_9.2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb.
Installing this one breaks booting the system -- none of the mount
points are found, even the disk may go haywire.
Please can you explain how did you find
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:41:43PM +0100, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
It is related to the package ufsutils_9.2-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb.
Installing this one breaks booting the system -- none of the mount
points are found, even the disk may go haywire.
It would help to see the last messages
Since you asked:
the kernel starts OK, but none of the partitions given in /etc/fstab
gets mounted. None is even listed if you try. The devices /dev/da0xx
are just missing.
I've did a lot of testing now and found that all packages available
for apt-get upgrade can be installed, but you have to
You may install all packages, except
freebsd-utils_9.2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb. Installing this one renders
the system unusable. Looks like this is a problem with installed udev
rules.
--
Thomas
attachment: df-u-x86_64-2013-12-19-18-29-47.png
On 19/12/2013 11:26, Markus Koschany wrote:
Newcons plus i915kms sounds like an interesting idea. Please feel free
to ping me for further testing. I'm also subscribed to debian-bsd now.
It's in 11.0~svn259528-2 if you want to try.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn259528-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn259528-2.dsc
kfreebsd-11_11.0~svn259528-2.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-11.0_11.0~svn259528-2_all.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:20:51 +0100
Source: kfreebsd-11
Binary: kfreebsd-source-11.0 kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0
kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-image-11-amd64
kfreebsd-headers-11.0-0-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-11-amd64
On 19/12/13 16:29, Thomas Schweikle wrote:
the kernel starts OK, but none of the partitions given in /etc/fstab
gets mounted
The problem seems to be in the early initscripts then.
Are you able to see/edit the /etc/fstab somehow? Perhaps from the
debian-installer shell:
On 19 December 2013 06:33, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
On 19/12/2013 04:21, Ed Maste wrote:
On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling
newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms
Em 2013-12-15 15:34, Steven Chamberlain escreveu:
On 15/12/13 04:22, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Yeah, that's unnecessary.
The program is ported now. What do you wnat? The patch or the package?
Did you patch some existing packaging to produce this? In that case a
debdiff may be
13 matches
Mail list logo
