On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 07:33 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Looking more closely:
On Debian wheezy kFreeBSD /sys appears to be sysfs not linsysfs.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 21:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> As you can see on Debian's munin problems page, the df* plugins report
> warnings due to some special filesystems on kFreeBSD.
...
> The workaround is to exclude these filesystem types from df output:
I've now pushed this workaround to DSA's m
Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 14.43:50 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-28):
> > The main argument in favour of "x.0" versioning was the possibility
> > (see #682656) to co-install versions across multiple releases.
> > Dropping the major version number from the package name
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-28):
> As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds.
Still noise and/or work for ftpmasters who are already quite busy.
> The main argument in favour of "x.0" versioning was the possibility (see
> #682656) to co-install versions across multiple rel
Steven Chamberlain (2014-10-28):
> On 28/10/14 12:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > There was no hurry AFAICT.
> [...]
> > Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, [...]
>
> Selfishly I'm keen for the existing debian-installer-netboot-images
> packages to go away as soon as p
Package: munin-plugins-core
Version: 2.0.6-4+deb7u2
Control: found -1 2.0.24-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/munin/plugins/df*
User: debian-ad...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needed-by-DSA-Team
Control: user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Control: usertags -1 + kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ad...@li
Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 13.56:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it
> might have been an opportunity to move away from X.0 versioning…
As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds.
The main argument in favour of "x.0
On 28/10/14 12:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> There was no hurry AFAICT.
[...]
> Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, [...]
Selfishly I'm keen for the existing debian-installer-netboot-images
packages to go away as soon as possible, as they're still Built-Using:
kfreebsd-
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-28):
> I've given more thought to this, and I think we should get d-i-n-i
> through NEW rather sooner than later (all binary package names get
> changed).
There was no hurry AFAICT.
Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it might
have bee
I would like to share a good experience I had with the kFreeBSD porter
team. On Sunday afternoon I foolishly uploaded a package which, if I
had thought about it, I ought to have known would FTBFS on FreeBSD.
Less than 4 hours later I had a bug report (#766913) from Steven
Chamberlain, who had tri
On 28/10/14 08:07, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.57:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> I understand the reasoning but I am not keen on moving files around at
>> this very late stage; if adding a symlink works, this would probably
>> be better.
Symlink sounds good to me;
Hi,
On 28/10/14 03:16, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> This package currently depends on libjinput-jni, which is currently
> not build on the kfreebsds (#657771), so the libjinput-java is
> uninstallable on those architectures.
Not a bug?
libjinput-java is an Arch: all package.
I assume it's actually
Hi all,
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.57:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-27):
> > Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> > > > * kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is
> > > > no un-numbered /netboot/ directory under w
13 matches
Mail list logo
