On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:31:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 25.06.23 um 13:37 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > > what about the
> > > following:
> > > - make all test failures fatal on a*64 (since upstream tests these), and
> > > - make smoketest failures fatal on all architectures
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success
> > > on architectures not tested by upstream.
> >
> > And have Format->Character in Impress crash
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:29:34PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>...
> Am 19.06.23 um 23:19 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
>...
> > For such a complex package I would expect 32bit breakage in every
> > release if upstream no longer tests on 32bit.
> Indeed, though at least for 32bit
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 09:31:05AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>...
> I won't be of much help here unfortunately, except
> maybe testing patches, but then again there's porterboxes
>...
You are the only one who could realistically debug many of these.
E.g. on armel it says:
Fatal exception:
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > I am sorry for the later response.
> >Hi,
> >
> > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> > to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12/1/20 5:02 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > I am sorry for the later response.
> >Hi,
> >
> > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> > to continue this for the lifetime of the Bullseye release
Source: makefs
Version: 20100306-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs buster sid
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/makefs.html
...
/build/1st/makefs-20100306/builddir/usr.sbin/makefs/nbsrc/sbin/mknod/pack_dev.c:
In function 'pack_native':
Control: severity -1 serious
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:28:47PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> severity 868929 important
> thanks
>
> (linux-)amd64 is not in this package's Architectures: field, therefore
> FTBFS on that arch cannot be a RC bug? (Though I'd be interested in
> fixing it
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>...
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>...
> > Worse, they break *differently* on whether…
> >
> > >Precisely to make the behavior consistent on all architectures, dpkg
> > >enables PIE (conditionally if
Package: freebsd-mk
Version: 10.3~svn296373-3
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:ctfutils
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ctfutils=armhf
The root cause of this ctfutils FTBFS is that -mfloat-abi=softfp
is passed to the compiler on armhf, which seems to come from
[ fullquote adding -ports, for people not following -release or -devel ]
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:35:07PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am arranging the final architecture qualification meeting for Stretch.
> This is primarily of interest to the release team, but I will also
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:32:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
...
For the remainder of the files, whilst we may consider granting a
squeeze-ignore tag, we would like to come to an agreement as to how we
can resolve these issues in the medium term.
...
Can you actually add a squeeze-ignore
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote:
...
If yes, build WebKit with JIT compilation disabled and
check whether that fixes the problem.
Unfortunately, webkit fails to build for me on kfreebsd, even unmodified
(and webkit takes a long time to build!):
CXXLD
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
Last friday I started Debian OpenBSD with the following targets
and milestones:
...
One question out of interest: What is the opinion of the OpenBSD people on
your project?
...
Right now I am working on dpkg and debhelper. they partly reley
on
14 matches
Mail list logo
