has another; I'd like to reference a canonical location for ports
(perhaps maintained by debian-ports or similar) so I don't have to
figure out for myself which ports need a tag and what that tag should
be, and which ports are just duplicates of other ports, and therefore
don't need a tag.
--
Don
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
These are the list of ports that I see:
I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead
harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldstable
- experimental
prefer.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
For those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
For those who do not, none is possible.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 different
.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
PowerPoint is symptomatic of a certain type of bureaucratic
environment: one typified by interminable presentations with lots of
fussy little bullet-points and flashy dissolves and soundtracks masked
into the background, to try
5 matches
Mail list logo
