Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-10-12 Thread Luca Favatella
On 05/10/2009, Luca Favatella wrote: > On 05/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > [...] >> I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works >> well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today. > > Thanks. > > When I have a bit of free time I hope to > * clean a bit

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-10-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 05/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: [...] > I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works > well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today. Thanks. When I have a bit of free time I hope to * clean a bit the svn dir to keep only 1.14 patches (moving patche

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-10-04 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 06:35:24PM +0200, Luca Favatella wrote: > On 01/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Luca Favatella a écrit : > [...] > >> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little > >> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply. > >> I kept the patches for 1

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-10-01 Thread Luca Favatella
On 01/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Luca Favatella a écrit : [...] >> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little >> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply. >> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that >> needed changes [1]. >> >

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-10-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Luca Favatella a écrit : > Hi, Aurelien. > > > I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little > task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply. > I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that > needed changes [1]. > > I updated the wiki page [

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-09-30 Thread Luca Favatella
Hi Otavio, hi Bastian. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:35:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid; > >>

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-09-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Bastian, On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid; >> Bastian, do you object? > > Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable. Anyway; do you

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-09-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid; > Bastian, do you object? Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable. Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Ki

Re: [busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-09-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Luca, On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Luca Favatella wrote: > Hi, Aurelien. > > > I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little > task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply. > I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that > needed c

[busybox on kbsd] patches ported to 1.14

2009-09-29 Thread Luca Favatella
Hi, Aurelien. I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply. I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that needed changes [1]. I updated the wiki page [2]. I only tested building busybox. I didn