On 05/10/2009, Luca Favatella wrote:
> On 05/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [...]
>> I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works
>> well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today.
>
> Thanks.
>
> When I have a bit of free time I hope to
> * clean a bit
On 05/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
> I have tested d-i with busybox 1.14.2 and your patches and it works
> well. Thanks! It will be used in the daily builds starting today.
Thanks.
When I have a bit of free time I hope to
* clean a bit the svn dir to keep only 1.14 patches (moving patche
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 06:35:24PM +0200, Luca Favatella wrote:
> On 01/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Luca Favatella a écrit :
> [...]
> >> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little
> >> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
> >> I kept the patches for 1
On 01/10/2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Luca Favatella a écrit :
[...]
>> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little
>> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
>> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that
>> needed changes [1].
>>
>
Luca Favatella a écrit :
> Hi, Aurelien.
>
>
> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little
> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that
> needed changes [1].
>
> I updated the wiki page [
Hi Otavio, hi Bastian.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:35:07PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
> >>
Hello Bastian,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
>> Bastian, do you object?
>
> Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable.
Anyway; do you
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
> Bastian, do you object?
Well, there is a 1.15.1 already as stable.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Ki
Hello Luca,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> Hi, Aurelien.
>
>
> I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little
> task, only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
> I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that
> needed c
Hi, Aurelien.
I ported kfreebsd busybox patches from 1.13 [0] to 1.14. It was a little task,
only 3 patches needed changes to apply.
I kept the patches for 1.13 in svn; I added a new dir with the ones that needed
changes [1].
I updated the wiki page [2].
I only tested building busybox. I didn
10 matches
Mail list logo