Hi all,
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.57:33 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-27):
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
* kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is
no un-numbered /netboot/ directory
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-28):
I've given more thought to this, and I think we should get d-i-n-i
through NEW rather sooner than later (all binary package names get
changed).
There was no hurry AFAICT.
Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-28):
As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds.
Still noise and/or work for ftpmasters who are already quite busy.
The main argument in favour of x.0 versioning was the possibility (see
#682656) to co-install versions across
Le mardi, 28 octobre 2014, 14.43:50 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-28):
The main argument in favour of x.0 versioning was the possibility
(see #682656) to co-install versions across multiple releases.
Dropping the major version number from the
[ Cc: debian-bsd@ ]
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-27):
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
* kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is no
un-numbered /netboot/ directory under which we could automagically
take
5 matches
Mail list logo
