Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 04:57:00PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hello, > > > Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > Any update on this? This bug is preventing the kFreeBSD platforms > > > from getting a newer APT version, as APT requires cmake (>= 3.4) > > > to build. Because of this, APT is at

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi, I set up a UFS filesystem to build on, but could not reproduce the bug. Please could someone try the attached diff? If it fails, please share the exact error (does it fail at the -build1 step or at -build2?), and because the `ls` I added will show the file timestamps, to help debug. This

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Brad King wrote: > FYI, the IS_NEWER_THAN check actually documents that it returns true > when the times are exactly equal: Thanks for pointing that out! I suppose it is not working as expected, then, but I can't see why. kfreebsd does have st_mtim, and the code for that looks right to me:

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi, I've tried looking at this from the other direction -- on ZFS with high-resolution timestamps, I'm trying to find a way to reproduce the issue as seen on the Debian buildds. Here are timestamps in Build/Tests/RunCMake/Configure/RerunCMake-build/ right after `file(WRITE "${input}" "2")`,

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

On 04/06/2016 05:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > | if(${BuildDepends_BINARY_DIR}/Project/multi2-real.txt > | IS_NEWER_THAN ${BuildDepends_BINARY_DIR}/Project/multi2-stamp.txt) > > If multi2-real.txt and multi2-stamp.txt are created within 1 second of > each other, the test will most

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Samuel Thibault wrote: > BTW, you may find > set abort_noattach=ask-yes > > useful in .muttrc :) Thanks! I will try that. And maybe more sleep, or coffee. Patch might be attached. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org --- a/Tests/RunCMake/Configure/RunCMakeTest.cmake +++

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Samuel Thibault, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 13:07:18 +0200, wrote: > Steven Chamberlain, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 11:54:26 +0100, wrote: > > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Nothing was attached :) > > > > Sorry - attached! > > Mmm, nope :) BTW, you may find set abort_noattach=ask-yes useful in .muttrc :)

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Steven Chamberlain, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 11:54:26 +0100, wrote: > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Nothing was attached :) > > Sorry - attached! Mmm, nope :) Samuel

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Samuel Thibault wrote: > Nothing was attached :) Sorry - attached! Christoph found that increasing some of these sleeps to 3 seconds allowed the test to pass *some* of the time. The first sleep in Tests/RunCMake/Configure/RunCMakeTest.cmake should make CustomCMakeOutput.txt newer than

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Steven Chamberlain, on Thu 07 Apr 2016 01:47:58 +0100, wrote: > Christoph Egger wrote: > > Start 284: RunCMake.Configure > > 284/371 Test #284: RunCMake.Configure > > ...***Failed3.19 sec > > I have a wild idea what might be happening here. Please could

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi, > Steven Chamberlain writes: > > Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes > > try the attached patch please? Christoph Egger wrote: > Start 284: RunCMake.Configure > 284/371 Test #284: RunCMake.Configure >

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes >> try the attached patch please? > > Here's how to run that test on its own, verbosely, in an already-built > Debian build tree: > > $

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi FWIW on the 3.2 build (with the patch) I started untill I noticed it wasn't quite the right version Steven Chamberlain writes: > Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> 292 - RunCMake.Configure (Failed) > > Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes > try

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes > try the attached patch please? Here's how to run that test on its own, verbosely, in an already-built Debian build tree: $ Build/bin/cmake "-DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH=Tests/RunCMake"

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > 292 - RunCMake.Configure (Failed) Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes try the attached patch please? Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org --- a/Tests/RunCMake/Configure/RunCMakeTest.cmake +++

Re: Bug#815231: cmake: FTBFS on kfreebsd, hurd: 2 tests fail: BuildDepends, RunCMake.Configure

Hi, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > The following tests FAILED: > 113 - BuildDepends (Failed) I finally figured this out! The BuildDepends test will fail when run on a filesystem not having sub-second granularity. So for example, it fails on kfreebsd UFS, and whatever filesystem the hurd-i386