On 07/25/2013 12:08 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
Petr, if you could commit the patch (so that authorship is preserved),
I'll do an upload today (otherwise I'll commit myself, although I
prefer to have proper attributtions on the VCS).
Ok, that would be awesome. I have already set up a kfreebsd
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 07:29:53 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Do we have other options except waiting for a new release of libusb2-dev
and removing the outdated kfreebsd packages from testing to make
libgphoto2 and sane-backends swiftly migrate to testing?
Anyways, what keeps us from just
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 12:21:37 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Petr, if you could commit the patch (so that authorship is preserved),
I'll do an upload today (otherwise I'll commit myself, although I
prefer to have proper attributtions on the VCS).
It just remains to do upload, it is in our
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:16:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/25/2013 12:55 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm preparing the upload right now.
I'm ready and waiting with an updated libgphoto2 here. Just ping
me once you have uploaded freebsd-libs and I'll be pushing libgphoto2
On 07/25/2013 05:27 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:16:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/25/2013 12:55 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm preparing the upload right now.
I'm ready and waiting with an updated libgphoto2 here. Just ping
me once you have uploaded
On 07/23/2013 06:27 PM, Petr Salinger wrote:
It tries to autodetect, but then fails in a later step:
checking for libusb-1.0 to use... autodetect
checking for LIBUSB1... yes
checking libusb.h usability... no
checking libusb.h presence... yes
The attached patch may help with this. (I
On 24/07/13 09:42, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/23/2013 06:27 PM, Petr Salinger wrote:
Please just fix ENODATA occurence, with updated libusb2-dev
it suffices to build libgphoto2.
Hmm, Steven claimed it would work with just the patched libusb.h.
Sorry if I said/implied that; but
Please just fix ENODATA occurence, with updated libusb2-dev
it suffices to build libgphoto2.
Hmm, Steven claimed it would work with just the patched libusb.h.
Sorry if I said/implied that; but I had applied Markus' ENODATA fix
before testing for the other issue. So yes, both libusb2-dev and
On 07/24/2013 12:51 PM, Petr Salinger wrote:
It is possible give-back libgphoto2 when fixed libusb2-dev
will be in unstable.
When is that going to happen? ;)
The ENODATA occurence have to be fixed.
Sure, we'll do that. We just want to make sure the package actually
builds fine on the
On 24.07.2013 12:51, Petr Salinger wrote:
Please just fix ENODATA occurence, with updated libusb2-dev
it suffices to build libgphoto2.
Hmm, Steven claimed it would work with just the patched libusb.h.
Sorry if I said/implied that; but I had applied Markus' ENODATA fix
before testing for
Sorry for the bad formatting, sending from mobile.
Anyways, what keeps us from just integrating a patch in the libusb2-dev Debian
package and do a quick upload. Be it a normal upload or an NMU.
Adrian
On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:47 PM, Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de wrote:
On 24.07.2013 12:51,
Hi.
Do we have other options except waiting for a new release of libusb2-dev
and removing the outdated kfreebsd packages from testing to make
libgphoto2 and sane-backends swiftly migrate to testing?
Anyways, what keeps us from just integrating
a patch in the libusb2-dev Debian package and do
Hi Markus!
On 23/07/13 16:08, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...] on kFreeBSD-amd64 libusb-1.0 is not autodetected and libgphoto2
fails with another error.
It tries to autodetect, but then fails in a later step:
checking for libusb-1.0 to use... autodetect
checking for LIBUSB1... yes
checking
It tries to autodetect, but then fails in a later step:
checking for libusb-1.0 to use... autodetect
checking for LIBUSB1... yes
checking libusb.h usability... no
checking libusb.h presence... yes
The attached patch may help with this. (I applied it directly to my
system libusb.h). After
14 matches
Mail list logo
