El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
The packages which have not been successfully rebuilt thus far are:
- cdparanoia - maintainers, are there plans for an upload to resolve
#660403? If not, would you be averse to an NMU purely containing the
On 03.03.2012 16:07, Robert Millan wrote:
AFAICS the only remaining issues are:
freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to
go in.
kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days
old
to go in.
Well, there's also freebsd-utils (5/10 days) and:
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (03/03/2012):
AFAICS the only remaining issues are:
freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to go in.
kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days old
to go in.
Instead of waiting one more week, perhaps it'd
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
That rather depends
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
That rather depends on how long we think it's likely to take to get the
rest of the transition done, and
On 25.02.2012 16:03, Rogério Brito wrote:
Hi there.
On Feb 25 2012, Robert Millan wrote:
El 25 de febrer de 2012 13:46, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
- Unless there's
El 25 de febrer de 2012 17:51, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
In fact, it wasn't particularly hard at all, especially given the k3b
patch to use for inspiration. The attached diff makes the package build
again, although I don't have a suitable kfreebsd-* system available
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
- Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
binaries from testing. See
http://bugs.debian.org./cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660403#12
That doesn't work. The choices would be
El 25 de febrer de 2012 13:46, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
- Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
binaries from testing. See
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 15:44 +, Robert Millan wrote:
El 25 de febrer de 2012 13:46, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
- Unless there's further activity I recommend removing
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 16:19 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
However, the build failure doesn't look like it's unfixable
(or incredibly hard to fix), so I imagine they'd suggest fixing the bug
instead; it's certainly what I'd suggest.
Specifically, all of the failures appear to be inside code
tag 660403 + patch
thanks
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 16:19 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
However, the build failure doesn't look like it's unfixable
(or incredibly hard to fix), so I imagine they'd suggest fixing the bug
instead; it's certainly what I'd suggest.
In fact, it wasn't particularly
13 matches
Mail list logo
