Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> > Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and
> > there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads.
>
> And gcc-5. Done
And, again please :)
> > (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and
> there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads.
And gcc-5. Done
> (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...)
that cron would need to run as buildd user at
Hi Christoph,
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> please could somebody once again kill the hung gdb
> processes?
Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and
there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads.
(Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...)
Thanks,
> >> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> >> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
> >> > stuck again with hung gdb processes?
[...]
> > Please could you do the same again... some/all of the buildds are stuck
> > building gcc-snapshot.
Christoph
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
>> > stuck again with hung gdb processes?
>>
>> It is, will kill it in a minute just need to
Hello,
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
> > stuck again with hung gdb processes?
>
> It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password
>
> > Also, I can't see
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
> stuck again with hung gdb processes?
It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password
> Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently
Hello,
Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
stuck again with hung gdb processes?
Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently either.
Many thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2016-12-04 20:44, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Did we lose the kfreebsd-* buildds?
>
> The queues are huge, and the current wanna-build state has this:
>
> Building 2 1: arb (77d 22h 13m, non-free, fano), notmuch (3d 1h
> 37m, fayrfax)
> Building 1 1: notmuch
Hi!
Did we lose the kfreebsd-* buildds?
The queues are huge, and the current wanna-build state has this:
Building2 1: arb (77d 22h 13m, non-free, fano), notmuch (3d 1h
37m, fayrfax)
Building1 1: notmuch (3d 6h 42m, fils)
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
Just to add more information, the opendnssec build is failing due
doxygen builds (and blocking the transition to testing).
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=kfreebsd-i386pkg=opendnssecver=1%3A1.3.9-4
It was successfully built before and there's no -3 to -4 related
change which
Hi!
To answer your question on irc: You get buildd maintainers on
$a...@buildd.debian.org - kfreebsd-am...@buildd.debian.org. Currently
that's me (and maybe still Aurelien). Doxygen likes to segfault. I
assume the problem is actually doxygen but I think noone did actually
debug the problem
It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so
it seems to be rather reproducible.
I tried it today and it does not fail in my local
kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-(
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes:
It fails in a local kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) exactly the same way -- so
it seems to be rather reproducible.
I tried it today and it does not fail in my local
kfreebsd-i386 (kvm based) :-(
With or without sbuild involved?
Regards
Christoph
14 matches
Mail list logo