Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote: On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote: It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME is on kFreeBSD (vs. where

kfreebsd-amd64: monitor test hangs in _kqueue_thread_func()

2014-01-05 Thread Robert Millan
Package: glib2.0 Version: 2.38.2-1 Severity: important User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd monitor test hangs when running the testsuite on kfreebsd-amd64 (using glibc 2.18). AFAICT this bug is not the same as #712848, so filing separately. Note that kevent() is called

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Robert Millan w dniu 5 sty 2014, o godz. 12:22: On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote: On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote: It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a dialogue with the GNOME

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 05/01/2014 18:47, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: We can help as porters but we can't maintain abandoned codepaths on our own. I think GDM upstream doesn't want to deal with this problem, so perhaps it is better if we accept that GDM is not a portable program anymore, and make it

Re: kfreebsd-amd64: monitor test hangs in _kqueue_thread_func()

2014-01-05 Thread Robert Millan
tags 734290 patch thanks On 05/01/2014 17:55, Robert Millan wrote: Package: glib2.0 Version: 2.38.2-1 Severity: important User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd monitor test hangs when running the testsuite on kfreebsd-amd64 (using glibc 2.18). Please consider attached

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org (2014-01-05): So, gnome-shell is working for you? Can you please stop breaking threads? That's very annoying. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread brunomaximom
So, gnome-shell is working for you? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3d26b6360471ca9a1164153b95fe5...@openmailbox.org

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 05/01/2014 23:05, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: So, gnome-shell is working for you? Yes. It just needs a patch from the bug I mentioned. Or you can edit config.js by hand and comment out the bluetooth / network-manager bits. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread brunomaximom
Em 2014-01-05 20:34, Robert Millan escreveu: On 05/01/2014 23:05, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: So, gnome-shell is working for you? Yes. It just needs a patch from the bug I mentioned. Or you can edit config.js by hand and comment out the bluetooth / network-manager bits. I think the

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-05 Thread Robert Millan
On 05/01/2014 23:47, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: Em 2014-01-05 20:34, Robert Millan escreveu: On 05/01/2014 23:05, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote: So, gnome-shell is working for you? Yes. It just needs a patch from the bug I mentioned. Or you can edit config.js by hand and

Bug#734328: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Don't ship sys/sdt.h here

2014-01-05 Thread Samuel Bronson
Package: kfreebsd-kernel-headers Version: 9.2~5 Severity: normal Control: block 726248 by -1 Dear Maintainer, Given the facts: - nobody has ported the dtrace userspace to [e]glibc yet - there *are* packages that could benefit from systemtap's version of sys/sdt.h; in particular, GDB

Processed: kfreebsd-kernel-headers: Don't ship sys/sdt.h here

2014-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: block 726248 by -1 Bug #726248 [systemtap-sdt-dev] systemtap-sdt-dev: should be Arch: all so gcc and libc can B-D on it 726248 was not blocked by any bugs. 726248 was blocking: 700760 Added blocking bug(s) of 726248: 734328 -- 726248: