On 2014-02-14 00:32, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Secondly, there are cases like GDM, where a single unsupported package
have rather long reaching consequences. In the concrete example,
GNOME (via gnome-core) strictly depends on gdm3, meaning that if gdm3
goes, (more or less) all of
lördag den 26 oktober 2013 klockan 18:09 skrev Robert Millan detta:
Please could you try:
1. Rebuild freebsd-glue with attached patch
2. Add -I /usr/include/freebsd to CFLAGS in your package.
3. Add -lfreebsd-glue to LDFLAGS in your package.
This should seamlessly map sendfile() to the
On 16/02/2014 10:40, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
1. Rebuild freebsd-glue with attached patch
2. Add -I /usr/include/freebsd to CFLAGS in your package.
3. Add -lfreebsd-glue to LDFLAGS in your package.
This should seamlessly map sendfile() to the BSD version.
Alternatively, you can
söndag den 16 februari 2014 klockan 12:19 skrev Robert Millan detta:
On 16/02/2014 10:40, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
This should seamlessly map sendfile() to the BSD version.
Alternatively, you can skip step 2 and use bsd_sendfile() instead.
I now doubt the sanity of your undertaking,
On 16/02/2014 08:49, Niels Thykier wrote:
I believe Robert concluded that it was possible to use an alternative to
gdm3 (I forgot if it was lightdm or xdm).
Well, not exactly.
I think we're at a cross-roads. My understanding is that this used to be
possible
until now, but the GNOME
On 16/02/2014 12:33, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
But this raises a new question: Will present or future versions
of eglibc, with the architecture kfreebsd-any, expose a functional
library call
ssize_t sendfile (int, int, off_t, size_t)
for general use? I.e., will the stub ever be
6 matches
Mail list logo
