Package: di
Version: 4.13.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, rbr...@ime.usp.br
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br (02/09/2009):
I just
Hi, Aurel.
OK, I bit the bullet and now I am subscribed. :-)
You guys seem to be quite receptive to a newbie to a new platform and
this seems to be a great place for development.
On Sep 03 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:46:31PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Yes, hal
It'd be nice if you could test a build with that tiny workaround and
tell me whether it's worth asking for an upload in that
state. /proc-based files get some ˙˙no such file or directory˙˙, but
others might become useful when it comes to debugging other programs,
so we might want to have an
Hi,
the current coreutils FTBFS in current environment.
The failure of rm test is due to our best effort
emulation of *at syscalls. The rebuild of coreutils 7.4
fails in the similar way.
It will suffice to declare them as stubs in eglibc,
as they have been previously. We might change it later,
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (03/09/2009):
Neither lsof /lib/ld-2.9.so neither lsof -i produces expected
output. IMHO, in this case none is better.
ACK, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
5 matches
Mail list logo
