Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

* Lennart Sorensen: > There are a lot of 32bit powerpc chips still going into embedded systems > being built today. They are not going away anytime soon. Do they implement the ISA required by the existing Debian port?

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

> In other words, i don't think a s390x box will ever just die. I'm sure “death” encompasses all events which might lead Debian to lose access to relevant hardware. It's not just about faults with a piece of equipment.

init

Hi What are your plans for the future of init on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? Are you going to continue with sysvinit for the time being? For the upcoming release of ubuntuBSD I'm thinking about using BusyBox + OpenRC (https://blog.flameeyes.eu/2012/03/using-busybox-with-openrc). Do you think this

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 19 June 2016 at 02:25, William ML Leslie wrote: > > In case it isn't clear, the number of users of the architecture is not part > of the qualification, it is the amount of maintenance pressure involved. > Package maintainers have to put more effort into ensuring

Processed (with 7 errors): tagging 821961, tagging 821962, tagging 821963, tagging 821964, tagging 821965, tagging 821966 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 821961 + sid stretch Bug #821961 {Done: Fabian Wolff } [aiksaurus] aiksaurus: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets Added tag(s) sid and stretch. > tags 821962 + sid stretch Bug #821962