Source: grub2
Source-Version: 2.02~beta3-1
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:56:46PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> (2016-11-26):
> > Yep, as Thomas said, this changed back to the original state in
> > 2.02~beta3. I think that in fact allow
/commit/?id=496cca85259c77b5fc8ad39a9064c83c3a39b7a6
(Sorry, I forgot that d-i had worked around this.)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
, git-dpm update-patches, and amended that commit with the
changelog). I'll upload shortly.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
19efc465928912c02121d814da3f9ef859d4903acaf66f06e572edf1f4386b6e 259228
partman-zfs_36.tar.xz
Files:
9b6f4ae35dc68c22f40b7b08ba906849 1708 debian-installer standard
partman-zfs_36.dsc
3c6991dde158d069e518c96c641a9ded 259228 debian-installer standard
partman-zfs_36.tar.xz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Colin Watson cjwat
) $(GRUB_MODULES_PXE)
# workaround a gPXE bug
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
/function_spec.rb test also fails every time when
ruby1.8 was built using gcc-4.7 without -fno-tree-dce, but is fixed by
adding -fno-tree-dce when building ruby1.8. Just in case that helps
anyone ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
\
- --libdir=\$${prefix}/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
+ --libdir=\$${prefix}/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
+ $(confflags)
build-indep:
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110905125943.gc3
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
2010/11/18 Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org:
(Obviously, we can only control the size of the embedding area when
we're creating the partition table from scratch; trying to move existing
operating systems around transparently
be a simple bug, and
won't require policy changes to fix.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
.
This can be applied after these changes.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
afraid I don't understand Aurelien's mail. The current version (as
far as I'm aware) of the parted FreeBSD patch entirely relies on
libgeom. Wouldn't the correct fix for this be to build a libgeom0-udeb?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 04:41:50PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Colin Watson a écrit :
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:59:38PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
thanks to your efforts, parted gets now built again on kfreebsd-*;
unfortunately its udeb isn't installable since it depends on libgeom0
has to be ported again.
I don't know when I'll have time to work on that. In the meanwhile,
parted can probably be removed from kfreebsd.
I'm working on it right now. It's not a trivial forward-port, but it
doesn't look too bad.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat
to commit.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
POLLHUP)))
+#else
if (pollfds[i].revents POLLIN)
+#endif
This looks OK.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
is available in debootstrap's
+sources, see \fIscripts/porters/\fR).
I think we should fix this bug rather than enshrining it in
documentation. :-)
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:47:52PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com writes:
* Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org [2009-03-09 00:01]:
Martin Michlmayr persuaded me to tentatively volunteer for mentoring
the addition of mtd support, but actually I'd be much more
could mentor mtd support?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
of a PIE is, do you happen to have
a pointer to some docs/manual on it? I know (now) in theory what a
PIE is, but don't see the point.)
It lets us take advantage of address space layout randomisation to make
stack-smashing attacks harder.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
to avoid building PIEs on
anything other than Linux and NetBSD (note that I tagged this bug
pending), so please leave this bug open until I upload that.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386973
I highly recommend applying that instead.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that that has been worked around it's
due to a simple bug (#150976).
Could you please explain the problem on GNU in more detail?
I'm not sure about the *BSD ports.
Since privilege separation was developed on BSD, it seems highly likely
that the BSD ports will support it.
Cheers,
--
Colin
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:34:45AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:31:42AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:40:45PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, I did some research into nl_langinfo() for an upstream recently,
and found that it's
long to issue an advisory.
http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-072
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can file bugs against them, as
libc6-dev is build-essential on the architectures which have it.
As for binary dependencies on libc6, well, those are usually generated
using shlibdeps anyway.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo
