Re: Bug#633402: Bug#674260: RM: aspectc++ [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ROM; FTBFS on kfreebsd

2012-06-02 Thread Robert Millan
2012/5/29 Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de: What I find a bit irritating is that while using the same glibc version, Debian/kFreeBSD ships a different /usr/include/bits/fnctl.h to the other Debian architectures. The kFreeBSD Version reads: struct flock  {    __off_t l_start;    /*

Re: Bug#633402: Bug#674260: RM: aspectc++ [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ROM; FTBFS on kfreebsd

2012-05-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fr, Mai 25, 2012 at 01:35:09 (CEST), Guillem Jover wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 08:12:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal The package aspectc++ does not build on kfreebsd since April now. The reason for this is, as I suspect, a bug or insufficienty

Bug#674260: RM: aspectc++ [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ROM; FTBFS on kfreebsd

2012-05-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, The package aspectc++ does not build on kfreebsd since April now. The reason for this is, as I suspect, a bug or insufficienty in the fnctl() implementation on kfreebsd. In order to speed up compilation (ac++ is dead slow), the compilation is run in

Re: Bug#674260: RM: aspectc++ [kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] -- ROM; FTBFS on kfreebsd

2012-05-24 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 08:12:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal The package aspectc++ does not build on kfreebsd since April now. The reason for this is, as I suspect, a bug or insufficienty in the fnctl() implementation on kfreebsd. In order to speed