Re: [Fwd: Request to give back glibmm2.4 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386]

2018-09-16 Thread Svante Signell
Hi Mattias, glibmm2.4 built fine after given back. I asked for help on the #debian- buildd IRC channel. Maybe you can do the same next time too. On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 04:53 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Hi! > > I sent this to the wb-team list, but there was no response. But they > are

[Fwd: Request to give back glibmm2.4 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386]

2018-09-14 Thread Mattias Ellert
: Request to give back glibmm2.4 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd- i386 Datum: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:48:01 +0200 The builds of glibmm2.4 2.56.0-2 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 failed with: error: 'g_application_set_option_context_parameter_string' was not declared in this scope According

Re: Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

2018-07-30 Thread James Clarke
Hi Steven, Glad to see you back on the mailing list! On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Svante Signell wrote: >> > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building >> > packages for

Re: Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

2018-07-30 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > Svante Signell wrote: > > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building > > packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for > > your effort making this happening jrtc27 :) > > Thanks very

Re: Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

2018-07-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Svante Signell wrote: > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building > packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your > effort making this happening jrtc27 :) Thanks very much for this James! It was a really nice surprise to see packages building

Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

2018-04-20 Thread Svante Signell
Hi all, Cc: debian-devel The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to- date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages

Bug#781161: dovecot-core: Can't log in via imap on kFreeBSD amd64 (Auth request missing a file descriptor)

2015-03-25 Thread Jeff Epler
, the following messages are logged: dovecot: imap: Error: Auth request missing a file descriptor dovecot: imap-login: Error: read(imap) failed: Remote closed connection (service's process_limit reached?) When direcly invoking imap (mutt's set tunnel=/usr/lib/dovecot/imap), all is well. When I

Bug#749157: forwarded libusb.h LIBUSB_CALL request upstream

2014-05-25 Thread Scott Howard
forwarded 749157 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204 thanks Forwarded the bug to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: unblock request for kfreebsd-downloader 9.0-3+deb70.1

2013-06-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-06-20 0:25, Robert Millan wrote: +kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3+deb70.1) stable; urgency=low + + * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download. +(Closes: #712816) Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme +deb70.1 from? I don't think I've seen that one before

Re: unblock request for kfreebsd-downloader 9.0-3+deb70.1

2013-06-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 20/06/13 13:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2013-06-20 0:25, Robert Millan wrote: +kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3+deb70.1) stable; urgency=low + + * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download. +(Closes: #712816) Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme +deb70.1

Re: unblock request for kfreebsd-downloader 9.0-3+deb70.1

2013-06-20 Thread Robert Millan
2013/6/20 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme +deb70.1 from? I don't think I've seen that one before (our suggested version would have been +deb7u1, as per dev-ref). Steven just pointed out (correctly). I take note that +deb7u1 is

Re: Bug#675842: Retest request.

2012-06-29 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 26/06/12 18:02, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before the freeze. Hi, It seems to build OK now on kfreebsd-i386 after this commit fixed the

Bug#675842: Retest request.

2012-06-26 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
Hello: I have updated the [0] version of the package yet again, now in sync with latest upstream version. I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before the freeze. Please, don't

Bug#668026: Acknowledgement (libusb: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct usb_ctl_request' has no member named 'request')

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. As you

Request

2011-03-14 Thread yinhuleopard
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7dbd81.0b0cb5.02...@m132-177.yeah.net

Re: request for test build on kFreeBSD machine

2010-12-15 Thread Dererk
On 10/12/10 16:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'm trying to fix bugs 605821-605830 in my packages, and since I am not a DD or DM, I don't have access to the Debian build machines. Could someone please try a test build to see if I have indeed fixed the problem? Then I'll request an upload

Re: request for test build on kFreeBSD machine

2010-12-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
fixed the problem? Then I'll request an upload. (I'm not on this list, so please keep me cc'ed). The easiest way is using git-buildpackage: apt-get install git-buildpackage puredata debhelper quilt git clone \ https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-multimedia/pd-pmpd.git cd pd-pmpd git

request for test build on kFreeBSD machine

2010-12-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I'm trying to fix bugs 605821-605830 in my packages, and since I am not a DD or DM, I don't have access to the Debian build machines. Could someone please try a test build to see if I have indeed fixed the problem? Then I'll request an upload. (I'm not on this list, so please keep me cc'ed

Re: v4l howto and help request

2010-08-31 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi! This is a short guide on how to build webcamd and a request for help. webcamd is a port of Linux v4l drivers as a system daemon. I'm tryng to get it working so that I can migrate my desktop someday. Webcam support is mandatory or my sister will be upset ;-) Here are my steps: 1

v4l howto and help request

2010-08-27 Thread David Moles
Hi! This is a short guide on how to build webcamd and a request for help. webcamd is a port of Linux v4l drivers as a system daemon. I'm tryng to get it working so that I can migrate my desktop someday. Webcam support is mandatory or my sister will be upset ;-) Here are my steps: 1. Install

[Fwd: Bug#565550: acd0: unknown CMD (0x03) illegal request asc=0x20 ascq=0x00]

2010-01-16 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, I guess this is best handled by the kfreebsd team. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? ---BeginMessage--- Package: hal Version: 0.5.14-1 Severity: normal After installing hal on a kfreebsd port of Debian on a kvm

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib

2010-01-11 Thread Petr Salinger
I have tried to react on the warnings of buildd on kfreebsd. The release is planned to come soon. Please note that libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from incompatible pointer type is not problem in your code. Your code only detected problem in

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib

2010-01-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, me: None of the optional libraries and system features is used in the buildd compile runs: - libacl - support for Extended Attributes - zlib Nevertheless, the aspects of ACL and xattr are also porting issues. Guillem Jover: This is a general packaging bug, there's missing

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib (2nd try)

2010-01-04 Thread Petr Salinger
libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from incompatible pointer type Is stat.st_mode not of type mode_t ? The line in question is: aaip_cleanout_st_mode(a_text, (info.st_mode), 4 | 16); Argument number two is a component of struct stat info; The

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib (2nd try)

2010-01-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (04/01/2010): Aurelien, Cyril do you agree with this (eglibc) change? I'm really not the person to talk to about those kind of things. But speaking of eglibc, I guess you already know about the build failures we're facing with the latest upload (2.10.2-3)?

Re: Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib (2nd try)

2010-01-04 Thread Petr Salinger
That looks fine given that the kernel syscall is using 16 bits. For big endian targets, given we have none of them, it should not be a problem, they can use the same definition. Committed in glibc-bsd SVN. I will also add to pkg-glibc SVN, just after testsuite finishes. It's a pitty we have

Request for advise with mounting particular ISO 9660 sessions

2009-12-30 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, looking over the system dependencies in our project i come to the xorriso mount helper. It reads the table-of-content of multi-session media or files and produces a mount command for mounting a particular session. Typically used to retrieve older states from multi-session backups. I read

Re: Request for advise with mounting particular ISO 9660 sessions

2009-12-30 Thread Petr Salinger
I read from the porting instructions that i shall assume userland to be like Linux. Well, the kernel is the same as in FreeBSD, the libc is the same as in libc. Majority of userland is the same as Linux, but see bellow. But this line is a bit obscure to me: Example of uname check:

Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib

2009-12-30 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, looking over the system dependencies in our project i come to the xorriso mount helper. It reads the table-of-content of multi-session media or files and produces a mount command for mounting a particular session. Typically used to retrieve older states from multi-session backups. I read

Request for advise with struct stat, ACL, xattr, zlib (2nd try)

2009-12-30 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Sorry for sending the same old mail again. It should have been this one: I had a look at the buildd logs of our libisofs https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libisofs;ver=0.6.24-1;arch=kfreebsd-amd64;stamp=1255540287

Re: FAILURE/ILLEGAL REQUEST with kFreeBSD/i386

2009-09-03 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Aurel. OK, I bit the bullet and now I am subscribed. :-) You guys seem to be quite receptive to a newbie to a new platform and this seems to be a great place for development. On Sep 03 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:46:31PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: Yes, hal

FAILURE/ILLEGAL REQUEST with kFreeBSD/i386

2009-09-02 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi. This is the second time that I got a problem with the i386 system when installing in a qemu virtual machine (this time, I'm using kqemu, as I hinted at a previous messge). The attached dmesg is what I'm getting. :-( The funny thing is that when I did not upgrade things, everything was

Re: FAILURE/ILLEGAL REQUEST with kFreeBSD/i386

2009-09-02 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi once again, people. On Sep 02 2009, Rogério Brito wrote: I have the suspicion that hal is the culprit Yes, hal *is* the culprit. Disabling it completely with update-rc.d makes the system boot beautifully without any problems (but, then, you have to tweak the xorg.conf file, if you wish to

Re: request for enabling the ae driver for kernel 7.1

2008-11-29 Thread Luca Favatella
[sorry for the double email, I forgot to cc the list] On 28/11/2008, Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. Could you please consider enablig the ae driver in the next build of the FreeBSD 7.1 kernel? If you can't enable it, can you please suggest me the easier way to compile the ae

Re: request for enabling the ae driver for kernel 7.1

2008-11-28 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi. Could you please consider enablig the ae driver in the next build of the FreeBSD 7.1 kernel? If you can't enable it, can you please suggest me the easier way to compile the ae driver on Debian GNU/KfreeBSD? It is (will be) not available as built-in, but is is (will be) available as a

request for enabling the ae driver for kernel 7.1

2008-11-26 Thread Luca Favatella
Hi. I saw at [debian_svn] that in Debian svn you are targeting releng_7_1. I saw that the ae driver is not enabled for releng_7_1 ([releng_7_1_conf]), but it is enabled for head ([head_conf]). The ae driver is useful to provide LAN to Asus Eee PC 900, as described at [freebsd_wiki]. Could

request for upload of net-snmp into unreleased

2006-05-03 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi. I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN. Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. Following packages Build-depends on libsnmp9-dev: php4 php5 apcupsd cacti-cactid cheops cpqarrayd cyrus-imapd-2.2 cyrus21-imapd fwbuilder

Re: request for upload of net-snmp into unreleased

2006-05-03 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Robert Millan wrote: On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: Hi. I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN. Nice work. This was a though one. Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. Uploaded to i386 (I

Podcast Interview Request

2006-04-06 Thread Will Backman
Would anyone from the debian bsd project be interested in doing an interview for a BSD related podcast? You can find the podcast at http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com. -- Will Backman __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam

Your mail to ipp-request@pwg.org

2005-07-06 Thread ipp-request
This pre-recorded message is being sent in response to your recent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] All routine administrative requests (including subscriptions and unsubscriptions) concerning this mailing list are handled by an automated server. Please read this message carefully to find the

Re: Donation request

2004-05-13 Thread Carolina Prieto Muñiz
Hi, I belong to a family of twelve adults and several children. We have anything we need and more. I am writting this email to find a way to give away our more to people. Before I arrived to this house they used to thow almost new cloth into the garbage because they "did not want it" or

Re: [rebuild request] scsh for woody

2004-03-31 Thread Joost van Baal
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64 bit architectures, it won't work). I can't do it because I am not a Debian Developer, hence I

[rebuild request] scsh for woody

2004-03-28 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Hi, Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64 bit architectures, it won't work). I can't do it because I am not a Debian Developer, hence I don't have access to the Debian machines. Ready-to-build package at

Donation request

2004-03-24 Thread sos
. Our target is to raise the number of the athletes training in Special Olympics Kazakhstan to 15 000 by the year 2005. Next year we are planning to recruit 3 500 new athletes. Request for donation kids sport uniform for age from 5-17, footwear (sinkers,),sports ware (t- shirts, sport suits, shorts

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-10 Thread Joel Baker
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: So. I propose the following, and, barring objections over the next week or so, I'll take steps to update what I can to reflect this: uname -s will remain 'NetBSD'. uname -v will continue to have distinguishing features (I really

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-06 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:21:09AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Which works great, if it's libc-dev that's needed. It fails fairly severely, if a specific version of a library is needed due to, say, a fix in an included library that also requires a fix in the application. Not to mention

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-05 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing patches that use netbsd-i386 in a way that breaks the other port. I've been careful to keep such incompatible patches without submitting, since I

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-05 Thread Joel Baker
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:28:03PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing patches that use netbsd-i386 in a way that breaks the other port. I've been careful

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about what's going

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
There are very important technical reasons for these decisions, not only nomenclature correctness stuff. Let me explain. On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: uname -s: GNU/KFreeBSD Uhm. I'd have to turn on my box to

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-04 Thread Joel Baker
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: There are very important technical reasons for these decisions, not only nomenclature correctness stuff. Let me explain. On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: uname -s: GNU/KFreeBSD

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Indeed. As long as it's documented, people are probably going to be hand-selecting their APT entries, anyway, so it isn't such a big deal. [...] The Debian architecture will remain 'netbsd-i386', with the known issue that we'll

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-04 Thread Joel Baker
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:04:20AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: Indeed. As long as it's documented, people are probably going to be hand-selecting their APT entries, anyway, so it isn't such a big deal. [...] The Debian

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-03 Thread Joel Baker
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:41:00AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: Hi Joel, On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for the port

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-03 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi Joel, On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about

A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-02 Thread Joel Baker
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about what's going on, and because it doesn't dilute the NetBSD trademark. While the

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-02 Thread Michael Ritzert
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20: I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about If the NetBSD

Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-02 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:49:42PM +0100, Michael Ritzert wrote: Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20: I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for the port than

User remove request

2003-10-04 Thread
This user requested to be removed from your list. They have been automatically removed from the system. Please also make sure to remove: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org from all offline or backup lists you may maintain.

re: NetBSD: 1.6.1 or -current? Major discussion request.

2003-06-07 Thread matthew green
1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is patched to avoid using it), but it's fugly and really should be fixed. Conveniently, in -current, it is (after a PR requesting it). Can be backported, though I'm not entirely sure I'm comfortable with that, given how it affects

Re: NetBSD: 1.6.1 or -current? Major discussion request.

2003-06-07 Thread Joel Baker
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:45:40PM +1000, matthew green wrote: 1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is patched to avoid using it), but it's fugly and really should be fixed. Conveniently, in -current, it is (after a PR requesting it). Can be backported, though I'm

NetBSD: 1.6.1 or -current? Major discussion request.

2003-06-06 Thread Joel Baker
So. I've been building stuff based on 1.6(.1) for a while now, since it was the stable release. All well and good. However, recently I've started to run into a fairly serious set of problems (3 of them, total), of which only 2 can be backported. 1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is

xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi guys! You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v1 source package from the XSF is expected soonish).

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Joel Baker
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: Hi guys! You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:00:03AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some time now, which are

Re: GPL clarification request (Debian GNU/NetBSD port)

2002-10-19 Thread Richard Stallman
A preliminary inspection indicates that most of the required pieces fall under the old BSD license, with a few under the revised BSD license or the GNU GPL. The majority of these have copyrights by either UCB or The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. (TNF) If the copyright is

GPL clarification request (Debian GNU/NetBSD port)

2002-10-15 Thread Joel Baker
[ Please note: this message is sent as an interested party who is working ] [ on the Debian GNU/NetBSD project; I am in no way speaking on behalf of ] [ Debian in any official capacity.] Recently I came across a possible licensing conflict on one of the

[Fwd: ftp.debian.org: New architecture request]

2002-05-14 Thread Nathan Hawkins
PROTECTED] Subject: ftp.debian.org: New architecture request X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: ftp.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-14 Severity: normal Please add the architecture freebsd-i386 to the archive. This port runs

Request For Information

2001-08-30 Thread josh . winters
Hello, Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We would like to get some additional information about your business in an effort to explore the ways that we might be able to work together. If possible, we would like to receive your media package. If you have

Re: Request For Information

2001-08-30 Thread Brian Russo
busy people. - Brian On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:04:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We would like to get some additional information about your business in an effort to explore the ways that we might