Hi Mattias,
glibmm2.4 built fine after given back. I asked for help on the #debian-
buildd IRC channel. Maybe you can do the same next time too.
On Sat, 2018-09-15 at 04:53 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I sent this to the wb-team list, but there was no response. But they
> are
: Request to give back glibmm2.4 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-
i386
Datum: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:48:01 +0200
The builds of glibmm2.4 2.56.0-2 on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386
failed with:
error: 'g_application_set_option_context_parameter_string' was not
declared in this scope
According
Hi Steven,
Glad to see you back on the mailing list!
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Svante Signell
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Svante Signell wrote:
>> > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
>> > packages for
On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 09:17 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Svante Signell wrote:
> > The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
> > packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for
> > your effort making this happening jrtc27 :)
>
> Thanks very
Hi,
Svante Signell wrote:
> The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
> packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your
> effort making this happening jrtc27 :)
Thanks very much for this James! It was a really nice surprise to see
packages building
Hi all,
Cc: debian-devel
The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building
packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your
effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to-
date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages
, the following messages
are logged:
dovecot: imap: Error: Auth request missing a file descriptor
dovecot: imap-login: Error: read(imap) failed: Remote closed connection
(service's process_limit reached?)
When direcly invoking imap (mutt's set tunnel=/usr/lib/dovecot/imap),
all is well. When I
forwarded 749157 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204
thanks
Forwarded the bug to
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190204
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 2013-06-20 0:25, Robert Millan wrote:
+kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3+deb70.1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download.
+(Closes: #712816)
Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme +deb70.1 from?
I don't think I've seen that one before
On 20/06/13 13:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-06-20 0:25, Robert Millan wrote:
+kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3+deb70.1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download.
+(Closes: #712816)
Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme +deb70.1
2013/6/20 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Out of interest, where did you get the version scheme +deb70.1 from? I
don't think I've seen that one before (our suggested version would have been
+deb7u1, as per dev-ref).
Steven just pointed out (correctly). I take note that +deb7u1 is
On 26/06/12 18:02, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have
access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before
the freeze.
Hi,
It seems to build OK now on kfreebsd-i386 after this commit fixed the
Hello:
I have updated the [0] version of the package yet again, now in sync with
latest upstream version.
I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have
access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before
the freeze.
Please, don't
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7dbd81.0b0cb5.02...@m132-177.yeah.net
On 10/12/10 16:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm trying to fix bugs 605821-605830 in my packages, and since I am not
a DD or DM, I don't have access to the Debian build machines. Could
someone please try a test build to see if I have indeed fixed the
problem? Then I'll request an upload
fixed the
problem? Then I'll request an upload.
(I'm not on this list, so please keep me cc'ed).
The easiest way is using git-buildpackage:
apt-get install git-buildpackage puredata debhelper quilt
git clone \
https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-multimedia/pd-pmpd.git
cd pd-pmpd
git
I'm trying to fix bugs 605821-605830 in my packages, and since I am not
a DD or DM, I don't have access to the Debian build machines. Could
someone please try a test build to see if I have indeed fixed the
problem? Then I'll request an upload.
(I'm not on this list, so please keep me cc'ed
Hi!
This is a short guide on how to build webcamd and a request for help.
webcamd is a port of Linux v4l drivers as a system daemon.
I'm tryng to get it working so that I can migrate my desktop someday.
Webcam support is mandatory or my sister will be upset ;-)
Here are my steps:
1
Hi!
This is a short guide on how to build webcamd and a request for help.
webcamd is a port of Linux v4l drivers as a system daemon. I'm tryng to get it
working so that I can migrate my desktop someday. Webcam support is mandatory
or my sister will be upset ;-)
Here are my steps:
1. Install
Hi,
I guess this is best handled by the kfreebsd team.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
---BeginMessage---
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.14-1
Severity: normal
After installing hal on a kfreebsd port of Debian on a kvm
I have tried to react on the warnings of buildd
on kfreebsd. The release is planned to come soon.
Please note that
libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing
argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from
incompatible pointer type
is not problem in your code. Your code only detected
problem in
Hi,
me:
None of the optional libraries and system
features is used in the buildd compile runs:
- libacl
- support for Extended Attributes
- zlib
Nevertheless, the aspects of ACL and xattr are
also porting issues.
Guillem Jover:
This is a general packaging bug, there's missing
libisofs/builder.c:209: warning: passing
argument 2 of 'aaip_cleanout_st_mode' from
incompatible pointer type
Is stat.st_mode not of type mode_t ?
The line in question is:
aaip_cleanout_st_mode(a_text, (info.st_mode), 4 | 16);
Argument number two is a component of
struct stat info;
The
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (04/01/2010):
Aurelien, Cyril do you agree with this (eglibc) change?
I'm really not the person to talk to about those kind of things. But
speaking of eglibc, I guess you already know about the build failures
we're facing with the latest upload (2.10.2-3)?
That looks fine given that the kernel syscall is using 16 bits. For big
endian targets, given we have none of them, it should not be a problem,
they can use the same definition.
Committed in glibc-bsd SVN.
I will also add to pkg-glibc SVN, just after testsuite finishes.
It's a pitty we have
Hi,
looking over the system dependencies in our
project i come to the xorriso mount helper.
It reads the table-of-content of multi-session
media or files and produces a mount command
for mounting a particular session.
Typically used to retrieve older states from
multi-session backups.
I read
I read from the porting instructions that i
shall assume userland to be like Linux.
Well, the kernel is the same as in FreeBSD,
the libc is the same as in libc.
Majority of userland is the same as Linux,
but see bellow.
But this line is a bit obscure to me:
Example of uname check:
Hi,
looking over the system dependencies in our
project i come to the xorriso mount helper.
It reads the table-of-content of multi-session
media or files and produces a mount command
for mounting a particular session.
Typically used to retrieve older states from
multi-session backups.
I read
Hi,
Sorry for sending the same old mail again.
It should have been this one:
I had a look at the buildd logs of our libisofs
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libisofs;ver=0.6.24-1;arch=kfreebsd-amd64;stamp=1255540287
Hi, Aurel.
OK, I bit the bullet and now I am subscribed. :-)
You guys seem to be quite receptive to a newbie to a new platform and
this seems to be a great place for development.
On Sep 03 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:46:31PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Yes, hal
Hi.
This is the second time that I got a problem with the i386 system when
installing in a qemu virtual machine (this time, I'm using kqemu, as I
hinted at a previous messge).
The attached dmesg is what I'm getting. :-(
The funny thing is that when I did not upgrade things, everything was
Hi once again, people.
On Sep 02 2009, Rogério Brito wrote:
I have the suspicion that hal is the culprit
Yes, hal *is* the culprit.
Disabling it completely with update-rc.d makes the system boot
beautifully without any problems (but, then, you have to tweak the
xorg.conf file, if you wish to
[sorry for the double email, I forgot to cc the list]
On 28/11/2008, Petr Salinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Could you please consider enablig the ae driver in the next build of
the FreeBSD 7.1 kernel?
If you can't enable it, can you please suggest me the easier way to
compile the ae
Hi.
Could you please consider enablig the ae driver in the next build of
the FreeBSD 7.1 kernel?
If you can't enable it, can you please suggest me the easier way to
compile the ae driver on Debian GNU/KfreeBSD?
It is (will be) not available as built-in, but is is (will be) available
as a
Hi.
I saw at [debian_svn] that in Debian svn you are targeting releng_7_1.
I saw that the ae driver is not enabled for releng_7_1
([releng_7_1_conf]), but it is enabled for head ([head_conf]).
The ae driver is useful to provide LAN to Asus Eee PC 900, as
described at [freebsd_wiki].
Could
Hi.
I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN.
Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and
kfreebsd-amd64.
Following packages Build-depends on libsnmp9-dev:
php4
php5
apcupsd
cacti-cactid
cheops
cpqarrayd
cyrus-imapd-2.2
cyrus21-imapd
fwbuilder
Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:59PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Hi.
I just wrote dirty hack for net-snmp, committed in SVN.
Nice work. This was a though one.
Please could someone built it and upload for both kfreebsd-i386 and
kfreebsd-amd64.
Uploaded to i386 (I
Would anyone from the debian bsd project be interested
in doing an interview for a BSD related podcast? You
can find the podcast at http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com.
-- Will Backman
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
This pre-recorded message is being sent in response to your recent
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All routine administrative requests (including subscriptions and
unsubscriptions) concerning this mailing list are handled by an
automated server. Please read this message carefully to find the
Hi, I belong to a family of twelve adults and
several children. We have anything we need and more. I am writting this email to
find a way to give away our more to people. Before I arrived to this house they
used to thow almost new cloth into the garbage because they "did not want it" or
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by
rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64
bit architectures, it won't work). I can't do it because I am not a
Debian Developer, hence I
Hi,
Please help me move scsh from woody/main to woody/non-free by
rebuilding it for all 32 bit released architectures (don't try on 64
bit architectures, it won't work). I can't do it because I am not a
Debian Developer, hence I don't have access to the Debian machines.
Ready-to-build package at
. Our target is to raise the number of the
athletes training in Special Olympics Kazakhstan to 15 000 by the year
2005. Next year we are planning to recruit 3 500 new athletes.
Request for donation
kids sport uniform for age from 5-17, footwear (sinkers,),sports ware (t-
shirts, sport suits, shorts
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
So. I propose the following, and, barring objections over the next week
or so, I'll take steps to update what I can to reflect this:
uname -s will remain 'NetBSD'.
uname -v will continue to have distinguishing features (I really
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:21:09AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Which works great, if it's libc-dev that's needed. It fails fairly
severely, if a specific version of a library is needed due to, say, a fix
in an included library that also requires a fix in the application.
Not to mention
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing
patches
that use netbsd-i386 in a way that breaks the other port. I've been
careful
to keep such incompatible patches without submitting, since I
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:28:03PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:46:05PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Untill we resolve this, please take into consideration to avoid filing
patches
that use netbsd-i386 in a way that breaks the other port. I've been
careful
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for
the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about
what's going
There are very important technical reasons for these decisions, not only
nomenclature correctness stuff. Let me explain.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
uname -s: GNU/KFreeBSD
Uhm. I'd have to turn on my box to
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
There are very important technical reasons for these decisions, not only
nomenclature correctness stuff. Let me explain.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
uname -s: GNU/KFreeBSD
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Indeed. As long as it's documented, people are probably going to be
hand-selecting their APT entries, anyway, so it isn't such a big deal.
[...]
The Debian architecture will remain 'netbsd-i386', with the known issue
that we'll
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:04:20AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:22:36AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
Indeed. As long as it's documented, people are probably going to be
hand-selecting their APT entries, anyway, so it isn't such a big deal.
[...]
The Debian
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:41:00AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for
the port
Hi Joel,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:50:16PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for
the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for
the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about
what's going on, and because it doesn't dilute the NetBSD trademark. While
the
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20:
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for
the port than Debian GNU/NetBSD, both because it is more specific about
If the NetBSD
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:49:42PM +0100, Michael Ritzert wrote:
Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20:
I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the
general opinion seems to be that Debian GNU/KNetBSD is a better name for
the port than
This user requested to be removed from your list.
They have been automatically removed from the system.
Please also make sure to remove:
debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
from all offline or backup lists you may maintain.
1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is patched to avoid
using it), but it's fugly and really should be fixed. Conveniently, in
-current, it is (after a PR requesting it). Can be backported, though I'm
not entirely sure I'm comfortable with that, given how it affects
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:45:40PM +1000, matthew green wrote:
1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is patched to avoid
using it), but it's fugly and really should be fixed. Conveniently, in
-current, it is (after a PR requesting it). Can be backported, though I'm
So. I've been building stuff based on 1.6(.1) for a while now, since it
was the stable release. All well and good. However, recently I've
started to run into a fairly serious set of problems (3 of them, total),
of which only 2 can be backported.
1) __cxa_atexit - This can be worked around (GCC is
Hi guys!
You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some
time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an
xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v1 source package from the XSF is expected soonish).
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi guys!
You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some
time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:00:03AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:43:26PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
You're getting this mail because *BSD doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0.
As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some
time now, which are
A
preliminary inspection indicates that most of the required pieces fall
under the old BSD license, with a few under the revised BSD license or
the GNU GPL. The majority of these have copyrights by either UCB or The
NetBSD Foundation, Inc. (TNF)
If the copyright is
[ Please note: this message is sent as an interested party who is working ]
[ on the Debian GNU/NetBSD project; I am in no way speaking on behalf of ]
[ Debian in any official capacity.]
Recently I came across a possible licensing conflict on one of the
PROTECTED]
Subject: ftp.debian.org: New architecture request
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:13:33 -0400
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-14
Severity: normal
Please add the architecture freebsd-i386 to the archive. This port runs
Hello,
Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We
would like to get some additional information about your business in an effort
to explore the ways that we might be able to work together. If possible, we
would like to receive your media package. If you have
busy people.
- Brian
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:04:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We
would like to get some additional information about your business in an
effort to explore the ways that we might
70 matches
Mail list logo