On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:23:22PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
erm, so that was a typo?
Well, if you read the part of the message you elided, I laid out exactly
what the system is and isn't. You haven't answered my question about What
is a GNU-based system?, so I cannot tell you whether it
[ moved the discussion to debian-bsd ]
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
[1] as of now GNU/Hurd and GNU/*BSD only exist in Debian, but we can't
assume that for a configuration file.
And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
then it doesn't make sense to call
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
[ moved the discussion to debian-bsd ]
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
[1] as of now GNU/Hurd and GNU/*BSD only exist in Debian, but we can't
assume that for a configuration file.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:01:47AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
then it doesn't make sense to call it GNU/NetBSD, would you
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:52:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:01:47AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
And the NetBSD one is *not*
Joel Baker dijo [Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:08:42AM -0600]:
(...)
That's the situation with the NetBSD port as it stands. I'm happy to
discuss whether it should be Debian GNU/NetBSD/i386 or simply Debian
NetBSD/i386, but if we're going to dredge this up again, I'm going to have
to insist on
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:14:48PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:08:42AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:52:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
You just said it is *not* GNU-based. Do you know what GNU/Something
means?
*sigh* It was
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
into a
Robert Millan wrote:
ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? Glibc
requires GCC[1], which in turn requires (in most cases[2]) GNU binutils.
[1]
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system?
no. the GNU system is not a set of C
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 183
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff
Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
thanks! i'll
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 183
Added:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf
(see the header comments in patch #820)
I just wrote same idea into my TODO list
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf).
Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't already.
Good morning,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it
into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf
(see the header
16 matches
Mail list logo
